| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Change-Id: Id25cde5a6562e1598dcbbf7945ecdfacac5faed7
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6807
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
As of this commit, all three types of bindings scopes are compiled the
same way (i.e. compilation of non-recursive attribute sets has been
switched over to the new code paths).
This sets us up for doing the final implementation of nested attribute
sets.
HOWEVER, this breaks the existing implementation of nested attributes
in non-recursive attribute sets. That implementation is flawed and
unworkable in practice, so we need to do this dance to be able to
implement it correctly.
Change-Id: Iba2545c0d1d6b51f5e1a31a5d005b8d01da546d3
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6782
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Using `OpAttrSelect`, the ? operator will fail when encountering a
nested value that is not an attribute set.
This however breaks valid code, such as:
{ bs = 42; } ? bs.a.b
The fix is simply to use the same operator used in the `or` statement,
which leaves a sentinal on the stack if a field is not found or the
value is not an attribute set.
Change-Id: Ib28fc8a96e6d592b4cdbc3e65ba129ad8faecd66
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6211
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
