about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/web/tvl/blog/2024-02-tvix-update.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'web/tvl/blog/2024-02-tvix-update.md')
-rw-r--r--web/tvl/blog/2024-02-tvix-update.md333
1 files changed, 333 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/web/tvl/blog/2024-02-tvix-update.md b/web/tvl/blog/2024-02-tvix-update.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ce9bbf547f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/web/tvl/blog/2024-02-tvix-update.md
@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+We've now been working on our rewrite of Nix, [Tvix][], for a little more than
+two years.
+
+Our last written update was in September 2023, and although we did publish a
+couple of things in the meantime (flokli's talk on Tvix at [NixCon
+2023][nixcon2023], our interview at the [Nix Developer
+Dialogues][nix-dev-dialogues-tvix], or tazjin's [talk on
+tvix-eval][tvix-eval-ru] (in Russian)), we never found the time to write
+something down.
+
+In the meantime a lot of stuff has happened though, so it's time to change that
+:-)
+
+Note: This blog post is intended for a technical audience that is already
+intimately familiar with Nix, and knows what things like derivations or store
+paths are. If you're new to Nix, this will not make a lot of sense to you!
+
+## Evaluation regression testing
+
+Most of the evaluator work has been driven by evaluating `nixpkgs`, and ensuring
+that we produce the same derivations, and that their build results end up in the
+same store paths.
+
+Builds are not hooked up all the way to the evaluator yet, but for Nix code
+without IFD (such as `nixpkgs`!) we can verify this property without building.
+An evaluated Nix derivation's `outPath` (and `drvPath`) can be compared with
+what C++ Nix produces for the same code, to determine whether we evaluated the
+package (and all of its dependencies!) correctly [^1].
+
+We added integration tests in CI that ensure that the paths we calculate match
+C++ Nix, and are successfully evaluating fairly complicated expressions in them.
+For example, we test against the Firefox derivation, which exercises some of the
+more hairy bits in `nixpkgs` (like WASM cross-compilation infrastructure). Yay!
+
+Although we're avoiding fine-grained optimization until we're sure Tvix
+evaluates all of `nixpkgs` correctly, we still want to have an idea about
+evaluation performance and how our work affects it over time.
+
+For this we extended our benchmark suite and integrated it with
+[Windtunnel][windtunnel], which now regularly runs benchmarks and provides a
+view into how the timings change from commit to commit.
+
+In the future, we plan to run this as a part of code review, before changes are
+applied to our canonical branch, to provide this as an additional signal to
+authors and reviewers without having to run the benchmarks manually.
+
+## ATerms, output path calculation, and `builtins.derivation`
+
+We've implemented all of these features, which comprise the components needed to
+construct derivations in the Nix language, and to allow us to perform the path
+comparisons we mentioned before.
+
+As an interesting side note, in C++ Nix `builtins.derivation` is not actually a
+builtin! It is a piece of [bundled Nix code][nixcpp-builtins-derivation], that
+massages some parameters and then calls the *actual* builtin:
+`derivationStrict`. We've decided to keep this setup, and implemented support in
+Tvix to have builtins defined in `.nix` source code.
+
+These builtins return attribute sets with the previously mentioned `outPath` and
+`drvPath` fields. Implementing them correctly meant that we needed to implement
+output path calculation *exactly* the same way as Nix does (bit-by-bit).
+
+Very little of how this output path calculation works is documented anywhere in
+C++ Nix. It uses a subset of [ATerm][aterm] internally, produces "fingerprints"
+containing hashes of these ATerms, which are then hashed again. The intermediate
+hashes are not printed out anywhere (except if you [patch
+Nix][nixcpp-patch-hashes] to do so).
+
+We already did parts of this correctly while starting this work on
+[go-nix][go-nix-outpath] some while ago, but found some more edge cases and
+ultimately came up with a nicer interface for Tvix.
+
+All the Derivation internal data model, ATerm serialization and output path
+calculation have been sliced out into a more general-purpose
+[nix-compat][nix-compat-derivation] crate, alongside with more documentation
+unit tests and a Derivation ATerm parser, so hopefully this will now be more
+accessible for everyone now.
+
+Note our builtin does *not* yet persist the Derivation anywhere "on
+disk" (though we have a debug CL that does write it to a temporary directory,
+in case we want to track down differences).
+
+## `tvix-[ca]store`
+Tvix now has a store implementation!
+
+### The Nix model
+Inside Nix, store path contents are normally hashed and communicated in NAR
+format, which is very coarse and often wasteful - a single bit of change in one
+file in a large store path causes a new NAR file to be uploaded to the binary
+cache, which then needs to be downloaded.
+
+Additionally, identifying everything by the SHA256 digest of its NAR
+representation makes Nix store paths very incompatible with other
+content-addressed systems, as it's a very Nix-specific format.
+
+### The more granular Tvix model
+After experimenting with some concepts and ideas in Golang, mostly around how to
+improve binary cache performance[^3], both on-disk as well as over the network,
+we settled on a more granular, content-addressed and general-purpose format.
+
+Internally, it behaves very similar to how git handles tree objects, except
+blobs are identified by their raw BLAKE3 digests rather than some custom
+encoding, and similarly, tree/directory objects use the BLAKE3 digest of its
+canonical protobuf serialization as identifiers.
+
+This provides some immediate benefits:
+ - We only need to keep the same data once, even if it's used across different
+   store paths.
+ - Transfers can be more granular and only need to fetch the data that's
+   needed. Due to everything being content-addressed, it can be fetched from
+   anything supporting BLAKE3 digests, immediately making it compatible with
+   other P2P systems (IPFS blake3 blobs, …), or general-purpose
+   content-addressed caches ([bazel-remote]).
+
+There's a lot more details about the data model, certain decisions etc. in
+[the docs][castore-docs].
+
+### Compatibility
+We however still want to stay compatible with Nix, as in calculating
+"NAR-addressed" store paths the same, support substituting from regular Nix
+binary caches, as well as storing all the other additional metadata about store
+paths.
+
+We accomplished this by splitting the two different concerns into two separate
+`tvix-store` and `tvix-castore` crates, with the former one holding all
+Nix-specific metadata and functionality, and the latter being a general-purpose
+content-addressed blob and filesystem tree storage system, which is usable in a
+lot of contexts outside of Tvix too. For example, if you want to use
+tvix-castore to write your own git alternative, or provide granular and
+authenticated access into large scientific datasets, you could!
+
+### Backends
+In addition to a gRPC API and client bindings, there's support for local
+filesystem-based backends, as well as for sled, an embedded K/V database.
+
+We're also currently working on a backend supporting most common object
+storages, as well as on more granular seeking and content-defined chunking for
+blobs.
+
+### FUSE/virtiofs
+A tvix-store can be mounted via FUSE, or exposed through virtiofs[^4].
+While doing the obvious thing - allowing mounting and browsing the contents
+of the store, this will allow lazy substitution of builds on remote builders, be
+in containerized or virtualized workloads.
+
+We have an [example][tvix-boot-readme] in the repository seeding gnu hello into
+a throwaway store, then booting a MicroVM and executing it.
+
+### nar-bridge, bridging binary caches
+`nar-bridge` and the `NixHTTPPathInfoService` bridge `tvix-[ca]store` with
+existing Nix binary caches and Nix.
+
+The former exposes a `tvix-[ca]store` over the common Nix HTTP Binary Cache
+interface (both read and write).
+
+The latter allows Tvix to substitute from regular Nix HTTP Binary caches,
+unpacking NARs and ingesting them on-the-fly into the castore model.
+The necessary parsers for NARInfo, signatures etc are also available in the
+[nix-compat crate][nix-compat-narinfo].
+
+## EvalIO / builtins interacting with the store more closely
+tvix-eval itself is designed to be quite pure when it comes to IO - it doesn't
+do any IO directly on its own, but for the very little IO functionality it
+does as part of "basic interaction with paths" (like importing other
+`.nix` files), it goes through an `EvalIO` interface, which is provided to the
+Evaluator struct on instantiation.
+
+This allows us to be a bit more flexible with how IO looks like in practice,
+which becomes interesting for specific store implementations that might not
+expose a POSIX filesystem directly, or targets where we don't have a filesystem
+at all (like WASM).
+
+Using the `EvalIO` trait also lets `tvix-eval` avoid becoming too strongly
+coupled to a specific store implementation, hashing scheme etc[^2]. As we can
+extend the set of builtins available to the evaluator with "foreign builtins",
+these can live in other crates.
+
+Following this pattern, we started implementing some of the "basic" builtins
+that deal with path access in `tvix-eval`, like:
+
+ - `builtins.pathExists`
+ - `builtins.readFile`
+
+We also recently started working on more complicated builtins like
+`builtins.filterSource` and `builtins.path`, which are also used in `nixpkgs`.
+
+Both import a path into the store, and allow passing a Nix expression that's
+used as a filter function for each path. `builtins.path` can also ensuring the
+imported contents match a certain hash.
+
+This required the builtin to interact with the store and evaluator in a very
+tight fashion, as the filter function (written in Nix) needs to be repeatedly
+executed for each path, and its return value is able to cause the store to skip
+over certain paths (which it previously couldn't).
+
+Getting the abstractions right there required some back-and-forth, but the
+remaining changes should land quite soon.
+
+## Catchables / tryEval
+
+Nix has a limited exception system for dealing with user-generated errors:
+`builtins.tryEval` can be used to detect if an expression fails (if
+`builtins.throw` or `assert` are used to generate it). This feature requires
+extra support in any Nix implementation, as errors may not necessarily cause the
+Nix program to abort.
+
+The C++ Nix implementation reuses the C++ language-provided Exception system for
+`builtins.tryEval` which Tvix can't (even if Rust had an equivalent system):
+
+In C++ Nix the runtime representation of the program in execution corresponds
+to the Nix expression tree of the relevant source files. This means that an
+exception raised in C++ code will automatically bubble up correctly since the
+C++ and Nix call stacks are equivalent to each other.
+
+Tvix compiles the Nix expressions to a byte code program which may be mutated by
+extra optimization rules (for example, we hope to eliminate as many thunks as
+possible in the future). This means that such a correspondence between the state
+of the runtime and the original Nix code is not guaranteed.
+
+Previously, `builtins.tryEval` (which is implemented in Rust and can access VM
+internals) just allowed the VM to recover from certain kinds of errors. This
+proved to be insufficient as it [blew up as soon as a `builtins.tryEval`-ed
+thunk is forced again][tryeval-infrec] – extra bookkeeping was needed. As a
+solution, we now store recoverable errors as a separate runtime value type.
+
+As you can imagine, storing evaluation failures as "normal" values quickly leads
+to all sorts of bugs because most VM/builtins code is written with only ordinary
+values like attribute sets, strings etc. in mind.
+
+While ironing those out, we made sure to supplement those fixes with as many
+test cases for `builtins.tryEval` as possible. This will hopefully prevent any
+regressions if or rather when we touch this system again. We already have some
+ideas for replacing the `Catchable` value type with a cleaner representation,
+but first we want to pin down all the unspoken behaviour.
+
+## String contexts
+
+For a long time, we had the [working theory][refscan-string-contexts] that we
+could get away with not implementing string contexts, and instead do reference
+scanning on a set of "known paths" (and not implement
+`builtins.unsafeDiscardStringContext`).
+
+Unfortunately, we discovered that while this is *conceptually* true, due to a
+[bug in Nix][string-contexts-nix-bug] that's worked around in the
+`stdenv.mkDerivation` implementation, we can't currently do this and calculate
+the same hashes.
+
+Because hash compatibility is important for us at this point, we bit the bullet
+and added support for string contexts into our `NixString` implementation,
+implemented the context-related builtins, and added more unit tests that verify
+string context behaviour of various builtins.
+
+## Strings as byte strings
+
+C++ Nix uses C-style zero-terminated strings internally - however, until
+recently, Tvix has used standard Rust strings for string values. Since those are
+required to be valid UTF-8, we haven't been able to properly represent all the
+string values that Nix supports.
+
+We recently converted our internal representation to byte strings, which allows
+us to treat a `Vec<u8>` as a "string-like" value.
+
+## JSON/TOML/XML
+
+We added support for the `toJSON`, `toXML`, `fromJSON` and `fromTOML` builtins.
+
+`toXML` is particularly exciting, as it's the only format that allows expressing
+(partially applied) functions. It's also used in some of Nix' own test suite, so
+we can now include these in our unit test suite (and pass, yay!).
+
+## Builder protocol, drv->builder
+
+We've been working on the builder protocol, and Tvix's internal build
+representation.
+
+Nix uses derivations (encoded in ATerm) as nodes in its build graph, but it
+refers to other store paths used in that build by these store paths *only*. As
+mentioned before, store paths only address the inputs - and not the content.
+
+This poses a big problem in Nix as soon as builds are scheduled on remote
+builders: There is no guarantee that files at the same store path on the remote
+builder actually have the same contents as on the machine orchestrating the
+build. If a package is not binary reproducible, this can lead to so-called
+[frankenbuilds][frankenbuild].
+
+This also introduces a dependency on the state that's present on the remote
+builder machine: Whatever is in its store and matches the paths will be used,
+even if it was maliciously placed there.
+
+To eliminate this hermiticity problem and increase the integrity of builds,
+we've decided to use content-addressing in the builder protocol.
+
+We're currently hacking on this at [Thaigersprint](https://thaigersprint.org/)
+and might have some more news to share soon!
+
+--------------
+
+That's it for now, try out Tvix and hit us up on IRC or on our mailing list if
+you run into any snags, or have any questions.
+
+เจอกันนะ :)
+
+[^1]: We know that we calculated all dependencies correctly because of how their
+      hashes are included in the hashes of their dependents, and so on. More on
+      path calculation and input-addressed paths in the next section!
+[^2]: That's the same reason why `builtins.derivation[Strict]` also lives in
+      `tvix-glue`, not in `tvix-eval`.
+[^3]: See [nix-casync](https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nix-casync-a-more-efficient-way-to-store-and-substitute-nix-store-paths/16539)
+      for one example - investing content-defined chunking (while still keeping
+      the NAR format)
+[^4]: Strictly speaking, not limited to tvix-store - literally anything
+      providing a listing into tvix-castore nodes.
+
+[Tvix]:                       https://tvix.dev
+[aterm]:                      http://program-transformation.org/Tools/ATermFormat.html
+[bazel-remote]:               https://github.com/buchgr/bazel-remote/pull/715
+[castore-docs]:               https://cs.tvl.fyi/depot/-/blob/tvix/castore/docs
+[frankenbuild]:               https://blog.layus.be/posts/2021-06-25-frankenbuilds.html
+[go-nix-outpath]:             https://github.com/nix-community/go-nix/blob/93cb24a868562714f1691840e94d54ef57bc0a5a/pkg/derivation/hashes.go#L52
+[nix-compat-derivation]:      https://docs.tvix.dev/rust/nix_compat/derivation/struct.Derivation.html
+[nix-compat-narinfo]:         https://docs.tvix.dev/rust/nix_compat/narinfo/index.html
+[nix-dev-dialogues-tvix]:     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYG3T4l8RU8
+[nixcon2023]:                 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j67prAPYScY
+[tvix-eval-ru]:               https://tazj.in/blog/tvix-eval-talk-2023
+[nixcpp-builtins-derivation]: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/blob/49cf090cb2f51d6935756a6cf94d568cab063f81/src/libexpr/primops/derivation.nix#L4
+[nixcpp-patch-hashes]:        https://github.com/adisbladis/nix/tree/hash-tracing
+[refscan-string-contexts]:    https://inbox.tvl.su/depot/20230316120039.j4fkp3puzrtbjcpi@tp/T/#t
+[store-docs]:                 https://cs.tvl.fyi/depot/-/blob/tvix/store/docs/api.md
+[string-contexts-nix-bug]:    https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/4629
+[tryeval-infrec]:             https://b.tvl.fyi/issues/281
+[tvix-boot-readme]:           https://cs.tvl.fyi/depot/-/blob/tvix/boot/README.md
+[why-string-contexts-now]:    https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/10446/7/tvix/eval/docs/build-references.md
+[windtunnel]:                 https://staging.windtunnel.ci/tvl/tvix