about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/third_party/git/Documentation/howto/recover-corrupted-blob-object.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'third_party/git/Documentation/howto/recover-corrupted-blob-object.txt')
-rw-r--r--third_party/git/Documentation/howto/recover-corrupted-blob-object.txt144
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 144 deletions
diff --git a/third_party/git/Documentation/howto/recover-corrupted-blob-object.txt b/third_party/git/Documentation/howto/recover-corrupted-blob-object.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 1b3b188d3c..0000000000
--- a/third_party/git/Documentation/howto/recover-corrupted-blob-object.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,144 +0,0 @@
-Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 08:28:38 -0800 (PST)
-From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-Subject: corrupt object on git-gc
-Abstract: Some tricks to reconstruct blob objects in order to fix
- a corrupted repository.
-Content-type: text/asciidoc
-
-How to recover a corrupted blob object
-======================================
-
------------------------------------------------------------
-On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Yossi Leybovich wrote:
->
-> Did not help still the repository look for this object?
-> Any one know how can I track this object and understand which file is it
------------------------------------------------------------
-
-So exactly *because* the SHA-1 hash is cryptographically secure, the hash
-itself doesn't actually tell you anything, in order to fix a corrupt
-object you basically have to find the "original source" for it.
-
-The easiest way to do that is almost always to have backups, and find the
-same object somewhere else. Backups really are a good idea, and Git makes
-it pretty easy (if nothing else, just clone the repository somewhere else,
-and make sure that you do *not* use a hard-linked clone, and preferably
-not the same disk/machine).
-
-But since you don't seem to have backups right now, the good news is that
-especially with a single blob being corrupt, these things *are* somewhat
-debuggable.
-
-First off, move the corrupt object away, and *save* it. The most common
-cause of corruption so far has been memory corruption, but even so, there
-are people who would be interested in seeing the corruption - but it's
-basically impossible to judge the corruption until we can also see the
-original object, so right now the corrupt object is useless, but it's very
-interesting for the future, in the hope that you can re-create a
-non-corrupt version.
-
------------------------------------------------------------
-So:
-
-> ib]$ mv .git/objects/4b/9458b3786228369c63936db65827de3cc06200 ../
------------------------------------------------------------
-
-This is the right thing to do, although it's usually best to save it under
-it's full SHA-1 name (you just dropped the "4b" from the result ;).
-
-Let's see what that tells us:
-
------------------------------------------------------------
-> ib]$ git-fsck --full
-> broken link from    tree 2d9263c6d23595e7cb2a21e5ebbb53655278dff8
->              to    blob 4b9458b3786228369c63936db65827de3cc06200
-> missing blob 4b9458b3786228369c63936db65827de3cc06200
------------------------------------------------------------
-
-Ok, I removed the "dangling commit" messages, because they are just
-messages about the fact that you probably have rebased etc, so they're not
-at all interesting. But what remains is still very useful. In particular,
-we now know which tree points to it!
-
-Now you can do
-
-	git ls-tree 2d9263c6d23595e7cb2a21e5ebbb53655278dff8
-
-which will show something like
-
-	100644 blob 8d14531846b95bfa3564b58ccfb7913a034323b8    .gitignore
-	100644 blob ebf9bf84da0aab5ed944264a5db2a65fe3a3e883    .mailmap
-	100644 blob ca442d313d86dc67e0a2e5d584b465bd382cbf5c    COPYING
-	100644 blob ee909f2cc49e54f0799a4739d24c4cb9151ae453    CREDITS
-	040000 tree 0f5f709c17ad89e72bdbbef6ea221c69807009f6    Documentation
-	100644 blob 1570d248ad9237e4fa6e4d079336b9da62d9ba32    Kbuild
-	100644 blob 1c7c229a092665b11cd46a25dbd40feeb31661d9    MAINTAINERS
-	...
-
-and you should now have a line that looks like
-
-	10064 blob 4b9458b3786228369c63936db65827de3cc06200	my-magic-file
-
-in the output. This already tells you a *lot* it tells you what file the
-corrupt blob came from!
-
-Now, it doesn't tell you quite enough, though: it doesn't tell what
-*version* of the file didn't get correctly written! You might be really
-lucky, and it may be the version that you already have checked out in your
-working tree, in which case fixing this problem is really simple, just do
-
-	git hash-object -w my-magic-file
-
-again, and if it outputs the missing SHA-1 (4b945..) you're now all done!
-
-But that's the really lucky case, so let's assume that it was some older
-version that was broken. How do you tell which version it was?
-
-The easiest way to do it is to do
-
-	git log --raw --all --full-history -- subdirectory/my-magic-file
-
-and that will show you the whole log for that file (please realize that
-the tree you had may not be the top-level tree, so you need to figure out
-which subdirectory it was in on your own), and because you're asking for
-raw output, you'll now get something like
-
-	commit abc
-	Author:
-	Date:
-	  ..
-	:100644 100644 4b9458b... newsha... M  somedirectory/my-magic-file
-
-
-	commit xyz
-	Author:
-	Date:
-
-	  ..
-	:100644 100644 oldsha... 4b9458b... M	somedirectory/my-magic-file
-
-and this actually tells you what the *previous* and *subsequent* versions
-of that file were! So now you can look at those ("oldsha" and "newsha"
-respectively), and hopefully you have done commits often, and can
-re-create the missing my-magic-file version by looking at those older and
-newer versions!
-
-If you can do that, you can now recreate the missing object with
-
-	git hash-object -w <recreated-file>
-
-and your repository is good again!
-
-(Btw, you could have ignored the fsck, and started with doing a
-
-	git log --raw --all
-
-and just looked for the sha of the missing object (4b9458b..) in that
-whole thing. It's up to you - Git does *have* a lot of information, it is
-just missing one particular blob version.
-
-Trying to recreate trees and especially commits is *much* harder. So you
-were lucky that it's a blob. It's quite possible that you can recreate the
-thing.
-
-			Linus