about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/third_party/git/Documentation/gittutorial.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'third_party/git/Documentation/gittutorial.txt')
-rw-r--r--third_party/git/Documentation/gittutorial.txt677
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 677 deletions
diff --git a/third_party/git/Documentation/gittutorial.txt b/third_party/git/Documentation/gittutorial.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 59ef5cef1f..0000000000
--- a/third_party/git/Documentation/gittutorial.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,677 +0,0 @@
-gittutorial(7)
-==============
-
-NAME
-----
-gittutorial - A tutorial introduction to Git
-
-SYNOPSIS
---------
-[verse]
-git *
-
-DESCRIPTION
------------
-
-This tutorial explains how to import a new project into Git, make
-changes to it, and share changes with other developers.
-
-If you are instead primarily interested in using Git to fetch a project,
-for example, to test the latest version, you may prefer to start with
-the first two chapters of link:user-manual.html[The Git User's Manual].
-
-First, note that you can get documentation for a command such as
-`git log --graph` with:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ man git-log
-------------------------------------------------
-
-or:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git help log
-------------------------------------------------
-
-With the latter, you can use the manual viewer of your choice; see
-linkgit:git-help[1] for more information.
-
-It is a good idea to introduce yourself to Git with your name and
-public email address before doing any operation.  The easiest
-way to do so is:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git config --global user.name "Your Name Comes Here"
-$ git config --global user.email you@yourdomain.example.com
-------------------------------------------------
-
-
-Importing a new project
------------------------
-
-Assume you have a tarball project.tar.gz with your initial work.  You
-can place it under Git revision control as follows.
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ tar xzf project.tar.gz
-$ cd project
-$ git init
-------------------------------------------------
-
-Git will reply
-
-------------------------------------------------
-Initialized empty Git repository in .git/
-------------------------------------------------
-
-You've now initialized the working directory--you may notice a new
-directory created, named ".git".
-
-Next, tell Git to take a snapshot of the contents of all files under the
-current directory (note the '.'), with 'git add':
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git add .
-------------------------------------------------
-
-This snapshot is now stored in a temporary staging area which Git calls
-the "index".  You can permanently store the contents of the index in the
-repository with 'git commit':
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git commit
-------------------------------------------------
-
-This will prompt you for a commit message.  You've now stored the first
-version of your project in Git.
-
-Making changes
---------------
-
-Modify some files, then add their updated contents to the index:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git add file1 file2 file3
-------------------------------------------------
-
-You are now ready to commit.  You can see what is about to be committed
-using 'git diff' with the --cached option:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git diff --cached
-------------------------------------------------
-
-(Without --cached, 'git diff' will show you any changes that
-you've made but not yet added to the index.)  You can also get a brief
-summary of the situation with 'git status':
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git status
-On branch master
-Changes to be committed:
-Your branch is up to date with 'origin/master'.
-  (use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
-
-	modified:   file1
-	modified:   file2
-	modified:   file3
-
-------------------------------------------------
-
-If you need to make any further adjustments, do so now, and then add any
-newly modified content to the index.  Finally, commit your changes with:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git commit
-------------------------------------------------
-
-This will again prompt you for a message describing the change, and then
-record a new version of the project.
-
-Alternatively, instead of running 'git add' beforehand, you can use
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git commit -a
-------------------------------------------------
-
-which will automatically notice any modified (but not new) files, add
-them to the index, and commit, all in one step.
-
-A note on commit messages: Though not required, it's a good idea to
-begin the commit message with a single short (less than 50 character)
-line summarizing the change, followed by a blank line and then a more
-thorough description. The text up to the first blank line in a commit
-message is treated as the commit title, and that title is used
-throughout Git.  For example, linkgit:git-format-patch[1] turns a
-commit into email, and it uses the title on the Subject line and the
-rest of the commit in the body.
-
-Git tracks content not files
-----------------------------
-
-Many revision control systems provide an `add` command that tells the
-system to start tracking changes to a new file.  Git's `add` command
-does something simpler and more powerful: 'git add' is used both for new
-and newly modified files, and in both cases it takes a snapshot of the
-given files and stages that content in the index, ready for inclusion in
-the next commit.
-
-Viewing project history
------------------------
-
-At any point you can view the history of your changes using
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git log
-------------------------------------------------
-
-If you also want to see complete diffs at each step, use
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git log -p
-------------------------------------------------
-
-Often the overview of the change is useful to get a feel of
-each step
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git log --stat --summary
-------------------------------------------------
-
-Managing branches
------------------
-
-A single Git repository can maintain multiple branches of
-development.  To create a new branch named "experimental", use
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git branch experimental
-------------------------------------------------
-
-If you now run
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git branch
-------------------------------------------------
-
-you'll get a list of all existing branches:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-  experimental
-* master
-------------------------------------------------
-
-The "experimental" branch is the one you just created, and the
-"master" branch is a default branch that was created for you
-automatically.  The asterisk marks the branch you are currently on;
-type
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git switch experimental
-------------------------------------------------
-
-to switch to the experimental branch.  Now edit a file, commit the
-change, and switch back to the master branch:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-(edit file)
-$ git commit -a
-$ git switch master
-------------------------------------------------
-
-Check that the change you made is no longer visible, since it was
-made on the experimental branch and you're back on the master branch.
-
-You can make a different change on the master branch:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-(edit file)
-$ git commit -a
-------------------------------------------------
-
-at this point the two branches have diverged, with different changes
-made in each.  To merge the changes made in experimental into master, run
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git merge experimental
-------------------------------------------------
-
-If the changes don't conflict, you're done.  If there are conflicts,
-markers will be left in the problematic files showing the conflict;
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git diff
-------------------------------------------------
-
-will show this.  Once you've edited the files to resolve the
-conflicts,
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git commit -a
-------------------------------------------------
-
-will commit the result of the merge. Finally,
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ gitk
-------------------------------------------------
-
-will show a nice graphical representation of the resulting history.
-
-At this point you could delete the experimental branch with
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git branch -d experimental
-------------------------------------------------
-
-This command ensures that the changes in the experimental branch are
-already in the current branch.
-
-If you develop on a branch crazy-idea, then regret it, you can always
-delete the branch with
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git branch -D crazy-idea
--------------------------------------
-
-Branches are cheap and easy, so this is a good way to try something
-out.
-
-Using Git for collaboration
----------------------------
-
-Suppose that Alice has started a new project with a Git repository in
-/home/alice/project, and that Bob, who has a home directory on the
-same machine, wants to contribute.
-
-Bob begins with:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-bob$ git clone /home/alice/project myrepo
-------------------------------------------------
-
-This creates a new directory "myrepo" containing a clone of Alice's
-repository.  The clone is on an equal footing with the original
-project, possessing its own copy of the original project's history.
-
-Bob then makes some changes and commits them:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-(edit files)
-bob$ git commit -a
-(repeat as necessary)
-------------------------------------------------
-
-When he's ready, he tells Alice to pull changes from the repository
-at /home/bob/myrepo.  She does this with:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-alice$ cd /home/alice/project
-alice$ git pull /home/bob/myrepo master
-------------------------------------------------
-
-This merges the changes from Bob's "master" branch into Alice's
-current branch.  If Alice has made her own changes in the meantime,
-then she may need to manually fix any conflicts.
-
-The "pull" command thus performs two operations: it fetches changes
-from a remote branch, then merges them into the current branch.
-
-Note that in general, Alice would want her local changes committed before
-initiating this "pull".  If Bob's work conflicts with what Alice did since
-their histories forked, Alice will use her working tree and the index to
-resolve conflicts, and existing local changes will interfere with the
-conflict resolution process (Git will still perform the fetch but will
-refuse to merge --- Alice will have to get rid of her local changes in
-some way and pull again when this happens).
-
-Alice can peek at what Bob did without merging first, using the "fetch"
-command; this allows Alice to inspect what Bob did, using a special
-symbol "FETCH_HEAD", in order to determine if he has anything worth
-pulling, like this:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-alice$ git fetch /home/bob/myrepo master
-alice$ git log -p HEAD..FETCH_HEAD
-------------------------------------------------
-
-This operation is safe even if Alice has uncommitted local changes.
-The range notation "HEAD..FETCH_HEAD" means "show everything that is reachable
-from the FETCH_HEAD but exclude anything that is reachable from HEAD".
-Alice already knows everything that leads to her current state (HEAD),
-and reviews what Bob has in his state (FETCH_HEAD) that she has not
-seen with this command.
-
-If Alice wants to visualize what Bob did since their histories forked
-she can issue the following command:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ gitk HEAD..FETCH_HEAD
-------------------------------------------------
-
-This uses the same two-dot range notation we saw earlier with 'git log'.
-
-Alice may want to view what both of them did since they forked.
-She can use three-dot form instead of the two-dot form:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ gitk HEAD...FETCH_HEAD
-------------------------------------------------
-
-This means "show everything that is reachable from either one, but
-exclude anything that is reachable from both of them".
-
-Please note that these range notation can be used with both gitk
-and "git log".
-
-After inspecting what Bob did, if there is nothing urgent, Alice may
-decide to continue working without pulling from Bob.  If Bob's history
-does have something Alice would immediately need, Alice may choose to
-stash her work-in-progress first, do a "pull", and then finally unstash
-her work-in-progress on top of the resulting history.
-
-When you are working in a small closely knit group, it is not
-unusual to interact with the same repository over and over
-again.  By defining 'remote' repository shorthand, you can make
-it easier:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-alice$ git remote add bob /home/bob/myrepo
-------------------------------------------------
-
-With this, Alice can perform the first part of the "pull" operation
-alone using the 'git fetch' command without merging them with her own
-branch, using:
-
--------------------------------------
-alice$ git fetch bob
--------------------------------------
-
-Unlike the longhand form, when Alice fetches from Bob using a
-remote repository shorthand set up with 'git remote', what was
-fetched is stored in a remote-tracking branch, in this case
-`bob/master`.  So after this:
-
--------------------------------------
-alice$ git log -p master..bob/master
--------------------------------------
-
-shows a list of all the changes that Bob made since he branched from
-Alice's master branch.
-
-After examining those changes, Alice
-could merge the changes into her master branch:
-
--------------------------------------
-alice$ git merge bob/master
--------------------------------------
-
-This `merge` can also be done by 'pulling from her own remote-tracking
-branch', like this:
-
--------------------------------------
-alice$ git pull . remotes/bob/master
--------------------------------------
-
-Note that git pull always merges into the current branch,
-regardless of what else is given on the command line.
-
-Later, Bob can update his repo with Alice's latest changes using
-
--------------------------------------
-bob$ git pull
--------------------------------------
-
-Note that he doesn't need to give the path to Alice's repository;
-when Bob cloned Alice's repository, Git stored the location of her
-repository in the repository configuration, and that location is
-used for pulls:
-
--------------------------------------
-bob$ git config --get remote.origin.url
-/home/alice/project
--------------------------------------
-
-(The complete configuration created by 'git clone' is visible using
-`git config -l`, and the linkgit:git-config[1] man page
-explains the meaning of each option.)
-
-Git also keeps a pristine copy of Alice's master branch under the
-name "origin/master":
-
--------------------------------------
-bob$ git branch -r
-  origin/master
--------------------------------------
-
-If Bob later decides to work from a different host, he can still
-perform clones and pulls using the ssh protocol:
-
--------------------------------------
-bob$ git clone alice.org:/home/alice/project myrepo
--------------------------------------
-
-Alternatively, Git has a native protocol, or can use http;
-see linkgit:git-pull[1] for details.
-
-Git can also be used in a CVS-like mode, with a central repository
-that various users push changes to; see linkgit:git-push[1] and
-linkgit:gitcvs-migration[7].
-
-Exploring history
------------------
-
-Git history is represented as a series of interrelated commits.  We
-have already seen that the 'git log' command can list those commits.
-Note that first line of each git log entry also gives a name for the
-commit:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git log
-commit c82a22c39cbc32576f64f5c6b3f24b99ea8149c7
-Author: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-Date:   Tue May 16 17:18:22 2006 -0700
-
-    merge-base: Clarify the comments on post processing.
--------------------------------------
-
-We can give this name to 'git show' to see the details about this
-commit.
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git show c82a22c39cbc32576f64f5c6b3f24b99ea8149c7
--------------------------------------
-
-But there are other ways to refer to commits.  You can use any initial
-part of the name that is long enough to uniquely identify the commit:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git show c82a22c39c	# the first few characters of the name are
-			# usually enough
-$ git show HEAD		# the tip of the current branch
-$ git show experimental	# the tip of the "experimental" branch
--------------------------------------
-
-Every commit usually has one "parent" commit
-which points to the previous state of the project:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git show HEAD^  # to see the parent of HEAD
-$ git show HEAD^^ # to see the grandparent of HEAD
-$ git show HEAD~4 # to see the great-great grandparent of HEAD
--------------------------------------
-
-Note that merge commits may have more than one parent:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git show HEAD^1 # show the first parent of HEAD (same as HEAD^)
-$ git show HEAD^2 # show the second parent of HEAD
--------------------------------------
-
-You can also give commits names of your own; after running
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git tag v2.5 1b2e1d63ff
--------------------------------------
-
-you can refer to 1b2e1d63ff by the name "v2.5".  If you intend to
-share this name with other people (for example, to identify a release
-version), you should create a "tag" object, and perhaps sign it; see
-linkgit:git-tag[1] for details.
-
-Any Git command that needs to know a commit can take any of these
-names.  For example:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git diff v2.5 HEAD	 # compare the current HEAD to v2.5
-$ git branch stable v2.5 # start a new branch named "stable" based
-			 # at v2.5
-$ git reset --hard HEAD^ # reset your current branch and working
-			 # directory to its state at HEAD^
--------------------------------------
-
-Be careful with that last command: in addition to losing any changes
-in the working directory, it will also remove all later commits from
-this branch.  If this branch is the only branch containing those
-commits, they will be lost.  Also, don't use 'git reset' on a
-publicly-visible branch that other developers pull from, as it will
-force needless merges on other developers to clean up the history.
-If you need to undo changes that you have pushed, use 'git revert'
-instead.
-
-The 'git grep' command can search for strings in any version of your
-project, so
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git grep "hello" v2.5
--------------------------------------
-
-searches for all occurrences of "hello" in v2.5.
-
-If you leave out the commit name, 'git grep' will search any of the
-files it manages in your current directory.  So
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git grep "hello"
--------------------------------------
-
-is a quick way to search just the files that are tracked by Git.
-
-Many Git commands also take sets of commits, which can be specified
-in a number of ways.  Here are some examples with 'git log':
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git log v2.5..v2.6            # commits between v2.5 and v2.6
-$ git log v2.5..                # commits since v2.5
-$ git log --since="2 weeks ago" # commits from the last 2 weeks
-$ git log v2.5.. Makefile       # commits since v2.5 which modify
-				# Makefile
--------------------------------------
-
-You can also give 'git log' a "range" of commits where the first is not
-necessarily an ancestor of the second; for example, if the tips of
-the branches "stable" and "master" diverged from a common
-commit some time ago, then
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git log stable..master
--------------------------------------
-
-will list commits made in the master branch but not in the
-stable branch, while
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git log master..stable
--------------------------------------
-
-will show the list of commits made on the stable branch but not
-the master branch.
-
-The 'git log' command has a weakness: it must present commits in a
-list.  When the history has lines of development that diverged and
-then merged back together, the order in which 'git log' presents
-those commits is meaningless.
-
-Most projects with multiple contributors (such as the Linux kernel,
-or Git itself) have frequent merges, and 'gitk' does a better job of
-visualizing their history.  For example,
-
--------------------------------------
-$ gitk --since="2 weeks ago" drivers/
--------------------------------------
-
-allows you to browse any commits from the last 2 weeks of commits
-that modified files under the "drivers" directory.  (Note: you can
-adjust gitk's fonts by holding down the control key while pressing
-"-" or "+".)
-
-Finally, most commands that take filenames will optionally allow you
-to precede any filename by a commit, to specify a particular version
-of the file:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git diff v2.5:Makefile HEAD:Makefile.in
--------------------------------------
-
-You can also use 'git show' to see any such file:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git show v2.5:Makefile
--------------------------------------
-
-Next Steps
-----------
-
-This tutorial should be enough to perform basic distributed revision
-control for your projects.  However, to fully understand the depth
-and power of Git you need to understand two simple ideas on which it
-is based:
-
-  * The object database is the rather elegant system used to
-    store the history of your project--files, directories, and
-    commits.
-
-  * The index file is a cache of the state of a directory tree,
-    used to create commits, check out working directories, and
-    hold the various trees involved in a merge.
-
-Part two of this tutorial explains the object
-database, the index file, and a few other odds and ends that you'll
-need to make the most of Git. You can find it at linkgit:gittutorial-2[7].
-
-If you don't want to continue with that right away, a few other
-digressions that may be interesting at this point are:
-
-  * linkgit:git-format-patch[1], linkgit:git-am[1]: These convert
-    series of git commits into emailed patches, and vice versa,
-    useful for projects such as the Linux kernel which rely heavily
-    on emailed patches.
-
-  * linkgit:git-bisect[1]: When there is a regression in your
-    project, one way to track down the bug is by searching through
-    the history to find the exact commit that's to blame.  Git bisect
-    can help you perform a binary search for that commit.  It is
-    smart enough to perform a close-to-optimal search even in the
-    case of complex non-linear history with lots of merged branches.
-
-  * linkgit:gitworkflows[7]: Gives an overview of recommended
-    workflows.
-
-  * linkgit:giteveryday[7]: Everyday Git with 20 Commands Or So.
-
-  * linkgit:gitcvs-migration[7]: Git for CVS users.
-
-SEE ALSO
---------
-linkgit:gittutorial-2[7],
-linkgit:gitcvs-migration[7],
-linkgit:gitcore-tutorial[7],
-linkgit:gitglossary[7],
-linkgit:git-help[1],
-linkgit:gitworkflows[7],
-linkgit:giteveryday[7],
-link:user-manual.html[The Git User's Manual]
-
-GIT
----
-Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite