Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Change-Id: I5053e3f7dcea01e75baa933e4986396583ff22e8
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8831
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
|
|
Change-Id: I24e822351a837fce2aed568a647d009099ef32ec
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8747
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
There's very little reason to instantiate a GRPCPathInfoService in a
context where we are not already in a tokio context.
Change-Id: Ib81d649387717cb98de8a8039f92472f727b10c1
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8755
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Putting this in the PathInfoService trait makes much more sense, we can
have direct control over where/how to cache the results in the
implementation.
This now requires each PathInfoService to hold pointers to BlobService
and DirectoryService.
Change-Id: I4faae780d43eae4beeb57bd5e190e6d1a5d3314e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8724
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Change-Id: I4a4f6f713dd76bf95f393c094c0eb9b6d15c5436
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8613
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
|
|
We currently only support querying by the output hash digest.
This makes the interface a bit simpler.
Change-Id: I80b285373f1923e85cb0e404c4b15d51a7f259ef
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8570
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Change-Id: Ie8e205c691bd11db99fcf097357c1e49161c6e19
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8349
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|