| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
We previously kept the trait of a BlobService sync.
This however had some annoying consequences:
- It became more and more complicated to track when we're in a context
with an async runtime in the context or not, producing bugs like
https://b.tvl.fyi/issues/304
- The sync trait shielded away async clients from async worloads,
requiring manual block_on code inside the gRPC client code, and
spawn_blocking calls in consumers of the trait, even if they were
async (like the gRPC server)
- We had to write our own custom glue code (SyncReadIntoAsyncRead)
to convert a sync io::Read into a tokio::io::AsyncRead, which already
existed in tokio internally, but upstream ia hesitant to expose.
This now makes the BlobService trait async (via the async_trait macro,
like we already do in various gRPC parts), and replaces the sync readers
and writers with their async counterparts.
Tests interacting with a BlobService now need to have an async runtime
available, the easiest way for this is to mark the test functions
with the tokio::test macro, allowing us to directly .await in the test
function.
In places where we don't have an async runtime available from context
(like tvix-cli), we can pass one down explicitly.
Now that we don't provide a sync interface anymore, the (sync) FUSE
library now holds a pointer to a tokio runtime handle, and needs to at
least have 2 threads available when talking to a blob service (which is
why some of the tests now use the multi_thread flavor).
The FUSE tests got a bit more verbose, as we couldn't use the
setup_and_mount function accepting a callback anymore. We can hopefully
move some of the test fixture setup to rstest in the future to make this
less repetitive.
Co-Authored-By: Connor Brewster <cbrewster@hey.com>
Change-Id: Ia0501b606e32c852d0108de9c9016b21c94a3c05
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/9329
Reviewed-by: Connor Brewster <cbrewster@hey.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
|
|
This provides an additional configuration flag to the tvix-store mount
subcommand, and logic in the fuse module to request listing for the
root of the mountpoint.
Change-Id: I05a8bc11f7991b574696f27a30afe0f4e718a58c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/9217
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Reviewed-by: adisbladis <adisbladis@gmail.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I3a80560d036e7ed08036b5e9f0974080d1a30ded
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/9096
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
|
|
Makes use of https://github.com/tokio-rs/prost/pull/341, which makes our
bytes field cheaper to clone.
It's a bit annoying to configure due to
https://github.com/hyperium/tonic/issues/908, but the workaround does
get the job done.
Change-Id: I25714600b041bb5432d3adf5859b151e72b12778
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8975
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
|
|
Some paths might use names that are not valid UTF-8. We should be able
to represent them.
We don't actually need to touch the PathInfo structures, as they need to
represent StorePaths, which come with their own harder restrictions,
which can't encode non-UTF8 data.
While this doesn't change any of the wire format of the gRPC messages,
it does however change the interface of tvix_eval::EvalIO - its
read_dir() method does now return a list of Vec<u8>, rather than
SmolStr. Maybe this should be OsString instead?
Change-Id: I821016d9a58ec441ee081b0b9f01c9240723af0b
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8974
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: Ic705d05909c59c764d68a730169e9cc2b2538d60
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8847
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
This is a first implementation of a FUSE filesystem, mounting tvix-store
to a given location.
This is mostly meant as one additional lens into a store, and could be
used for builds. It's not meant to be used as a general-purpose thing.
It still has some rough edges:
- It doesn't implement open/close, so it doesn't use file handles.
Which means, we need to open blobs for partial reads over and over
again.
- It doesn't implement seek, as BlobReader doesn't implement seek yet.
- It doesn't track "lifetimes" of inodes by listening on forget,
meaning it might hold more data in memory than necessary.
- As we don't have store composition (and a caching layer) yet,
operations might be slow.
Change-Id: Ib1812ed761dfaf6aeb548443ae939c87530b7be8
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8667
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
