Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
In //tvix/eval:
* criterion bumped to 4.0, which at least depends on clap 3.x instead
of 2.x, which is less incompatible
In //tvix/cli:
* no changes required
In //tvix/nix_cli:
* some minor changes for compatibility with clap 4.0, no functionality
changes
Change-Id: If793f64b59fcaa2402d3d483ddbab4092f32df03
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7588
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
The tvix-eval project is independent from any *uses* of the evaluator,
such as the tvix-repl.
This functionality has been split out into a separate "tvix-cli"
crate. Note that this doesn't have to mean that this CLI crate is the
"final" CLI crate for tvix, the point of this is not "getting the CLI
structure right" but rather "getting the evaluator structure right".
This reshuffling is part of restructuring the way that functionality
like store communication is injected into language evaluation.
Note that at this commit the new CLI crate is not at feature-parity.
Change-Id: Id0af03dc8e07ef09a9f882a89612ad555eca8f93
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7541
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This removes internal uses of the previous crate::eval module, which
is being removed.
Change-Id: I5fb3c53460a9c5381853d0258f9ed074ab23c630
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7543
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
|
|
A step towards something more like how I imagine the future public API
for tvix-eval. Please note that this is definitely not the final
version yet, but it's better than the previous API that either exposed
a side-effecting blackbox, or a very low-level "interface".
The basic idea is that an evaluation of some Nix code is requested by
a caller with various parameters, but not all callers are interested
in all of these parameters.
There are also some bits of information that are returned from an
evaluation that are not necessarily relevant to all callers.
To support this somewhat ergonomically, the API is built around an
`Evaluation` struct that is configured by the caller with the various
parameters and then "executed".
Change-Id: I71826f3897126898adc2873d31c44d3eaf5c2be0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7542
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Introduces granular dependency builds using crate2nix, bootstrapped
off the generated configuration from the newly introduced
workspace (see cl/7533).
This commit checks in the generated Cargo.nix file which can be
regenerated with a parameterless invocation of `crate2nix generate` in
`//tvix`. I tried generating this in IFD, but it turned out to be
harder than what seemed worthwhile for now.
In this setup, the various build targets for Rust projects end up
being attributes of the imported `Cargo.nix` file at the `tvix.crates`
attribute. These still lack configuration, however, which has been
fixed in the various `default.nix` files of individual projects.
Note that we (temporarily) lose the ability to build tvix-eval's
benchmarks in CI. I haven't figured out what magic incantation summons
them from the void again ...
The `eval-okay-readDir` tests from both test suites have been disabled
because they fail for unknown reasons when run in this new derivation.
Somebody will have to debug it!
Change-Id: I2014614ccb9c8951aedbd71df7966ca191a13695
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7538
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This relates to the (abandoned) cl/7256.
Introduces a Cargo workspace at //tvix that is primarily intended to
be used as a workaround for the annoying Nix+Rust tooling while having
a consistent set of dependencies.
This is driven in part by a desire to adopt crate2nix and get more
granular Nix builds for Tvix's Rust projects, and in part by a need to
split //tvix/eval into something providing the CLI (REPL etc.), and a
library providing eval, without significantly altering the structure
of build targets.
To accomplish this the workspace has been designed to allow projects
to remain independent build targets. I want to avoid lumping all the
projects together - something like //tvix/eval should always be
independent of other parts of tvix.
A helper function in //tvix/default.nix lets downstream naersk
projects construct a sparse root for the project which combines the
workspace's `Cargo.lock` with the project's own `Cargo.toml`.
Note that cargo commands in the workspace itself require the build
dependencies of _all_ projects to be present, which is currently a bit
annoying to accomplish.
This introduces some breakage:
1. It breaks usage of rust-analyser without being in a shell with the
dependencies of *all* Tvix projects, as it is not capable of
respecting only the subset of dependencies for a part of the
workspace.
2. It is no longer possible to run tests using `cargo test`, as the
test generation crate we use does not work with workspaces:
https://github.com/frehberg/test-generator/issues/6
This still works in the Nix build as we construct a Cargo project
that looks like it's not in a workspace there. Until somebody fixes
that crate / writes a new macro / does something else with the test
suite, the way to run the tests is through the Nix build.
Long-term we'll probably want to get rid of cargo completely, it's
just a big wart and most tooling works without it if correctly
configured, but we don't have time for that now.
Change-Id: I846bff7a8429a25c077fd1e9ef4e3c34a299a4a1
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7533
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
A few weeks ago, oberblastmeister did a release to crates.io so we can
stop importing it via GitHub.
Change-Id: I9d5fa5cd281685779c71b12fed45ed201a1db17e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7532
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
Fixes b/212. Based on feedback in https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7492, all
uses of `NixAttrs::from_map` have been removed. Only `from_iter` and
`from_kv` remain.
Change-Id: I52e25f73018c2aa1843197427516b7a852503e2c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7500
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: IslandUsurper <lyle@menteeth.us>
|
|
Allows for the removal of some BTreeMap usage when constructing NixAttrs
by allowing any iterator over 2-tuples to build a NixAttrs. Some
instances of BTreeMap didn't have anything to do with making NixAttrs,
and some were just the best tool for the job, so they are left using the
old `from_map` interface.
Change-Id: I668ea600b0d93eae700a6b1861ac84502c968d78
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7492
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Maybe counter-intuitively the inner elements of a list or the
attribute values of an attribute set will be forced despite
pointer equality (but only one layer deep).
Change-Id: I485d96452fb56f5fb342d39039c9137725b33d3f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7371
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This came up in the Nix Language channel today and I thought it
warranted a test case.
We did actually implement this correctly.
Change-Id: I4b37c92d06eb6e3a7f59ea3d10af38f2b0a93d53
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7493
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I9baf2810fbd5b6ee8bfe10fce5b64801a35c1d67
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7369
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I617d402c8ecc7aaf607c4bdcd58a06ebddb71fac
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7370
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
Rust doesn't do tail-call elimination (still!) so the best we can
hope for here is to inline non-recursive invocations.
Change-Id: I78949967e48b006fcbf31786d8f6281cd122f36f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7360
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
Before this, tvix was spending most of its time furiously re-parsing
and re-compiling nixpkgs, each time hoping to get a different result...
Change-Id: I1c0cfbf9af622c276275b1f2fb8d4e976f1b5533
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7361
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I8d11f2db4489a7d82910256069d10f8bed3bdf9a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7451
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I3a55413e5004777b90c06cd8655f26abb2faf39b
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7448
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I2ab53453ed7370b520bb929ef7285e4f23eec65b
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7453
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I344b66c39cbc4b426accc482aa8f6f2eb18db68a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7417
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I92acb7e6099a4796d953b2d4d02cca4076ed0fb1
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7426
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
With this change, the test introduced by cl/7370 passes.
Change-Id: Ie7d2f02a59d61151f14ebd328e6cfa5892cacfb0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7375
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
This passes all the function/thunk-pointer-equality tests in
cl/7369.
Change-Id: Ib47535ba2fc77a4f1c2cc2fd23d3a879e21d8b4c
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7358
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: If07250a45fdf65a3f22ed8c37d7f37b45edccde9
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7416
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
The backtrace-on-stack-overflow create provides best-effort stack
traces when a stack overflow happens. Since it's running on the
(usually tiny) signal alternate stack this isn't easy.
This is guarded by a new `backtrace_overflow` feature flag and never
enabled (even if that feature is selected) for release builds. This
is strictly for debugging; there's crazy unsafe voodoo in there.
https://lib.rs/crates/backtrace-on-stack-overflow
Example output:
```
Stack Overflow:
0: backtrace_on_stack_overflow::handle_sigsegv
at /home/amjoseph/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/backtrace-on-stack-overflow-0.2.0/src/lib.rs:93:40
1: <unknown>
2: __rust_probestack
3: tvix_eval::vm::VM::run_op
at src/vm.rs:399
4: tvix_eval::vm::VM::run
at src/vm.rs:388:23
5: tvix_eval::vm::VM::enter_frame
at src/vm.rs:360:22
6: tvix_eval::value::thunk::Thunk::force
at src/value/thunk.rs:116:25
7: tvix_eval::vm::VM::run_op
at src/vm.rs:801:37
8: tvix_eval::vm::VM::run
at src/vm.rs:388:23
9: tvix_eval::vm::VM::enter_frame
at src/vm.rs:360:22
10: tvix_eval::value::thunk::Thunk::force
at src/value/thunk.rs:116:25
...
```
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I1d8a2017f836be7bf91a2223e7adacb86fa1dbb2
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7354
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Tests included.
Change-Id: I7a4905d6103813373e383e2e8629c5fd243d6bca
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7377
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I9d986dd8c0aad4e67df01bda13cee443e0fc0d20
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7415
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: If81ff414dba10a0448b905eec373730a68795376
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7376
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
See cl/7368
Change-Id: I97630994c3d65f4d16414a0da236ce000a5b6d33
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7374
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
See cl/7372; Nix equality semantics require the ability to track
pointer equality of upvalue-sets.
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I82ba517499cf370189a80355e4e46a5caaab7153
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7373
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This test case checks two things:
* A sanity check that "pointer equality for functions" means not
just the lambda, but also the upvalues.
* To be pointer-equal, it is not enough for the upvalues to be
normal-form equal (i.e. `nix_eq()`-equal); the upvalues must be
*pointer*-equal. The second part of the test case checks for
this.
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I4e59327a6f199b8212e97197b212e3c3934bb3f0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7372
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
The "dep:" syntax in Cargo.toml is very new; crate2nix master has
support for it, but they have not yet made a release with this
update, and therefore the crate2nix in nixpkgs does not yet support
it.
Could we avoid using "dep:" for a few weeks to give crate2nix a
chance to release so I can bump the version in nixpkgs? I've opened
an issue asking crate2nix to make a release:
https://github.com/kolloch/crate2nix/issues/264
I propose that if they haven't acted within a month we stop waiting
and revert this at that time.
Change-Id: I999a72429db667bedf4b2cdba27cb63b3f3d9657
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7350
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I6dfc9108220762ef3372cd2739e91d79c01a55e1
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7366
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: Ia373eb30d8516a056f1349f9011dee9816593d6f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7357
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Change-Id: I3b1284e28c350bfed84d643ae7f922f3487e1f2a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7355
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: Ib813d794177c623bf2f12fc2e6a6f304089607d1
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7356
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
When we start unrecursivifying (sp?) things, Rust's borrow checker
is going to be a headache; its magic only works when you use the CPU
stack as your call stack.
Fixing the borrow checker issues usually involves adding lots of
`clone()`s. Right now `NixList` is the only variant of `Value` that
isn't cheap to clone() -- all the others are either a wrapper around
Rc or else are of bounded size.
Note that this requires dropping the `DerefMut for NixList` instance
and using `Vec<Value>` instead in those situations.
Change-Id: I5a47df66855342aa2064f8f3cb7934ff422d26bd
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7359
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
When comparing Nix values for equality, an issue can occur where
recursive values contain thunks to themselves which causes borrow
errors when forcing them for comparison later down the line.
To work around this we clone the values for now. There might be some
optimisations possible like checking for thunk equality directly and
short-circuiting on that (we have to check what Nix does).
Change-Id: I7e75c992ea68f100058f52b4b46168da7d671994
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7314
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: Ief9ebc2285a0c50654c2edd3351432dc1588f9fc
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7313
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
When passing multiple arguments, every intermediate callable needs to
be forced as this is expected by the VM's call_value function.
Also adds a debug assertion for this which makes it easier to spot
exactly what went wrong.
Change-Id: I3aa519cb6cdaab713bd18282bef901c4cd77c535
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7312
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
This function covers builtins.genericClosure, seemingly including
weird behaviour around the order in which the work set is processed.
For some reason, in C++ Nix the test expectation is written in XML
which we do not yet support, so I have created a new expectation file
using `nix-instantiate --eval --strict` on the file (yes, using C++
Nix).
Change-Id: Id90e7117d120dc66d963a51083c4d8e8f2d9f181
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7311
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This implementation closely follows the original implementation in
Nix, including the use of an equality-based "set" structure to track
keys that have already been processed.
Note that this test does not yet enable the `notyetpassing` test for
builtins.genericClosure because (for as of yet unknown reasons) this
test compares against XML output (however, evaluating the test case
actually does work).
This takes us one step closer to nixpkgs eval.
This commit was written somewhere in the North Sea.
Co-Authored-By: Griffin Smith <root@gws.fyi>
Change-Id: I450a866e6f2888b27c2fe7c7f77ce0f79bfe3e6c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7310
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic52159141b2346dd580215566056aca7110f0a10
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7253
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Both //tvix/eval and //tvix/nix_cli have need to for rust tooling available
in $PATH.
Move this one level up, so it's accessible in all subdirectories.
Change-Id: I0763bbe9cefdc962f3a8f86c51e8f67cde8b4b04
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7248
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This detects if the second argument of a division is a zero (either as integer
or as float). If so, an error message is displayed.
This fixes b/219.
Change-Id: I50203d14a71482bc757832a2c8dee08eb7d35c49
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7258
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
|
|
Add a new `documentation: Option<&'static str>` field to Builtin, and
populate it in the `#[builtins]` macro with the docstring of the builtin
function, if any.
Change-Id: Ic68fdf9b314d15a780731974234e2ae43f6a44b0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7205
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Refactor the arguments of a Builtin to be a vec of a new BuiltinArgument
struct, which contains the old strictness boolean and also a static
`name` str - this is automatically determined via the ident for the
corresponding function argument in the proc-macro case, and passed in in
the cases where we're still manually calling Builtin::new.
Currently this name is unused, but in the future this can be used as
part of a documentation system for builtins.
Change-Id: Ib9dadb15b69bf8c9ea1983a4f4f197294a2394a6
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7204
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Some new top-level re-exports (specifically VM, Builtin, and ErrorKind)
were added to lib.rs in tvix/eval to allow the builtin-macros tests to
work - we should be clear which of these are part of the public
interface (I think it's reasonable for ErrorKind to be) and which
aren't (specifically I'm not sure VM and Builtin necessarily should be,
at least yet).
Change-Id: I3bbeaa63cdda9227224cd3bc298a9bb8da4deb7c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7203
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Similar to what we did with pure builtins, define the impure builtins
within a module at the top-level using the new #[builtins] attribute
macro
Change-Id: Ie5d5135d00bb65e651531df6eadba642cd4eb08e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7202
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Break out all pure builtin functions to top-level functions defined
within the `pure_builtins` module in `builtins/mod.rs`.
Change-Id: I9a10660446d557b1a86da4c45a463e9a1a9b4f2d
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7201
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Mostly as a proof-of-concept of the new proc-macros for defining
builtins, define a single builtin (the first in the list, `abort`) at
the top-level of a child module within builtins/mod.rs, and add it to
the list of builtins returned from `pure_builtins`.
If this works nicely, we can start breaking out the rest of the builtins
into the top-level too, in addition to introducing additional sets of
builtins (to differentiate between pure and impure builtins).
Change-Id: I5bdd57c57fecf8d63c9fed4fc6b1460f533b20f2
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7199
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|