Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Allows for the removal of some BTreeMap usage when constructing NixAttrs
by allowing any iterator over 2-tuples to build a NixAttrs. Some
instances of BTreeMap didn't have anything to do with making NixAttrs,
and some were just the best tool for the job, so they are left using the
old `from_map` interface.
Change-Id: I668ea600b0d93eae700a6b1861ac84502c968d78
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7492
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Maybe counter-intuitively the inner elements of a list or the
attribute values of an attribute set will be forced despite
pointer equality (but only one layer deep).
Change-Id: I485d96452fb56f5fb342d39039c9137725b33d3f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7371
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This came up in the Nix Language channel today and I thought it
warranted a test case.
We did actually implement this correctly.
Change-Id: I4b37c92d06eb6e3a7f59ea3d10af38f2b0a93d53
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7493
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I9baf2810fbd5b6ee8bfe10fce5b64801a35c1d67
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7369
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I617d402c8ecc7aaf607c4bdcd58a06ebddb71fac
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7370
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
Rust doesn't do tail-call elimination (still!) so the best we can
hope for here is to inline non-recursive invocations.
Change-Id: I78949967e48b006fcbf31786d8f6281cd122f36f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7360
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
Before this, tvix was spending most of its time furiously re-parsing
and re-compiling nixpkgs, each time hoping to get a different result...
Change-Id: I1c0cfbf9af622c276275b1f2fb8d4e976f1b5533
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7361
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I8d11f2db4489a7d82910256069d10f8bed3bdf9a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7451
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I3a55413e5004777b90c06cd8655f26abb2faf39b
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7448
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I2ab53453ed7370b520bb929ef7285e4f23eec65b
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7453
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I344b66c39cbc4b426accc482aa8f6f2eb18db68a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7417
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I92acb7e6099a4796d953b2d4d02cca4076ed0fb1
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7426
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
With this change, the test introduced by cl/7370 passes.
Change-Id: Ie7d2f02a59d61151f14ebd328e6cfa5892cacfb0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7375
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
This passes all the function/thunk-pointer-equality tests in
cl/7369.
Change-Id: Ib47535ba2fc77a4f1c2cc2fd23d3a879e21d8b4c
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7358
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: If07250a45fdf65a3f22ed8c37d7f37b45edccde9
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7416
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
The backtrace-on-stack-overflow create provides best-effort stack
traces when a stack overflow happens. Since it's running on the
(usually tiny) signal alternate stack this isn't easy.
This is guarded by a new `backtrace_overflow` feature flag and never
enabled (even if that feature is selected) for release builds. This
is strictly for debugging; there's crazy unsafe voodoo in there.
https://lib.rs/crates/backtrace-on-stack-overflow
Example output:
```
Stack Overflow:
0: backtrace_on_stack_overflow::handle_sigsegv
at /home/amjoseph/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/backtrace-on-stack-overflow-0.2.0/src/lib.rs:93:40
1: <unknown>
2: __rust_probestack
3: tvix_eval::vm::VM::run_op
at src/vm.rs:399
4: tvix_eval::vm::VM::run
at src/vm.rs:388:23
5: tvix_eval::vm::VM::enter_frame
at src/vm.rs:360:22
6: tvix_eval::value::thunk::Thunk::force
at src/value/thunk.rs:116:25
7: tvix_eval::vm::VM::run_op
at src/vm.rs:801:37
8: tvix_eval::vm::VM::run
at src/vm.rs:388:23
9: tvix_eval::vm::VM::enter_frame
at src/vm.rs:360:22
10: tvix_eval::value::thunk::Thunk::force
at src/value/thunk.rs:116:25
...
```
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I1d8a2017f836be7bf91a2223e7adacb86fa1dbb2
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7354
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Tests included.
Change-Id: I7a4905d6103813373e383e2e8629c5fd243d6bca
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7377
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I9d986dd8c0aad4e67df01bda13cee443e0fc0d20
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7415
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: If81ff414dba10a0448b905eec373730a68795376
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7376
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
See cl/7368
Change-Id: I97630994c3d65f4d16414a0da236ce000a5b6d33
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7374
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
See cl/7372; Nix equality semantics require the ability to track
pointer equality of upvalue-sets.
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I82ba517499cf370189a80355e4e46a5caaab7153
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7373
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This test case checks two things:
* A sanity check that "pointer equality for functions" means not
just the lambda, but also the upvalues.
* To be pointer-equal, it is not enough for the upvalues to be
normal-form equal (i.e. `nix_eq()`-equal); the upvalues must be
*pointer*-equal. The second part of the test case checks for
this.
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I4e59327a6f199b8212e97197b212e3c3934bb3f0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7372
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I6dfc9108220762ef3372cd2739e91d79c01a55e1
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7366
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: Ia373eb30d8516a056f1349f9011dee9816593d6f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7357
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Change-Id: I3b1284e28c350bfed84d643ae7f922f3487e1f2a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7355
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: Ib813d794177c623bf2f12fc2e6a6f304089607d1
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7356
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
When we start unrecursivifying (sp?) things, Rust's borrow checker
is going to be a headache; its magic only works when you use the CPU
stack as your call stack.
Fixing the borrow checker issues usually involves adding lots of
`clone()`s. Right now `NixList` is the only variant of `Value` that
isn't cheap to clone() -- all the others are either a wrapper around
Rc or else are of bounded size.
Note that this requires dropping the `DerefMut for NixList` instance
and using `Vec<Value>` instead in those situations.
Change-Id: I5a47df66855342aa2064f8f3cb7934ff422d26bd
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7359
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
When comparing Nix values for equality, an issue can occur where
recursive values contain thunks to themselves which causes borrow
errors when forcing them for comparison later down the line.
To work around this we clone the values for now. There might be some
optimisations possible like checking for thunk equality directly and
short-circuiting on that (we have to check what Nix does).
Change-Id: I7e75c992ea68f100058f52b4b46168da7d671994
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7314
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: Ief9ebc2285a0c50654c2edd3351432dc1588f9fc
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7313
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
When passing multiple arguments, every intermediate callable needs to
be forced as this is expected by the VM's call_value function.
Also adds a debug assertion for this which makes it easier to spot
exactly what went wrong.
Change-Id: I3aa519cb6cdaab713bd18282bef901c4cd77c535
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7312
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
This function covers builtins.genericClosure, seemingly including
weird behaviour around the order in which the work set is processed.
For some reason, in C++ Nix the test expectation is written in XML
which we do not yet support, so I have created a new expectation file
using `nix-instantiate --eval --strict` on the file (yes, using C++
Nix).
Change-Id: Id90e7117d120dc66d963a51083c4d8e8f2d9f181
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7311
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This implementation closely follows the original implementation in
Nix, including the use of an equality-based "set" structure to track
keys that have already been processed.
Note that this test does not yet enable the `notyetpassing` test for
builtins.genericClosure because (for as of yet unknown reasons) this
test compares against XML output (however, evaluating the test case
actually does work).
This takes us one step closer to nixpkgs eval.
This commit was written somewhere in the North Sea.
Co-Authored-By: Griffin Smith <root@gws.fyi>
Change-Id: I450a866e6f2888b27c2fe7c7f77ce0f79bfe3e6c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7310
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
This detects if the second argument of a division is a zero (either as integer
or as float). If so, an error message is displayed.
This fixes b/219.
Change-Id: I50203d14a71482bc757832a2c8dee08eb7d35c49
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7258
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
|
|
Add a new `documentation: Option<&'static str>` field to Builtin, and
populate it in the `#[builtins]` macro with the docstring of the builtin
function, if any.
Change-Id: Ic68fdf9b314d15a780731974234e2ae43f6a44b0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7205
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Refactor the arguments of a Builtin to be a vec of a new BuiltinArgument
struct, which contains the old strictness boolean and also a static
`name` str - this is automatically determined via the ident for the
corresponding function argument in the proc-macro case, and passed in in
the cases where we're still manually calling Builtin::new.
Currently this name is unused, but in the future this can be used as
part of a documentation system for builtins.
Change-Id: Ib9dadb15b69bf8c9ea1983a4f4f197294a2394a6
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7204
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Some new top-level re-exports (specifically VM, Builtin, and ErrorKind)
were added to lib.rs in tvix/eval to allow the builtin-macros tests to
work - we should be clear which of these are part of the public
interface (I think it's reasonable for ErrorKind to be) and which
aren't (specifically I'm not sure VM and Builtin necessarily should be,
at least yet).
Change-Id: I3bbeaa63cdda9227224cd3bc298a9bb8da4deb7c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7203
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Similar to what we did with pure builtins, define the impure builtins
within a module at the top-level using the new #[builtins] attribute
macro
Change-Id: Ie5d5135d00bb65e651531df6eadba642cd4eb08e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7202
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Break out all pure builtin functions to top-level functions defined
within the `pure_builtins` module in `builtins/mod.rs`.
Change-Id: I9a10660446d557b1a86da4c45a463e9a1a9b4f2d
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7201
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Mostly as a proof-of-concept of the new proc-macros for defining
builtins, define a single builtin (the first in the list, `abort`) at
the top-level of a child module within builtins/mod.rs, and add it to
the list of builtins returned from `pure_builtins`.
If this works nicely, we can start breaking out the rest of the builtins
into the top-level too, in addition to introducing additional sets of
builtins (to differentiate between pure and impure builtins).
Change-Id: I5bdd57c57fecf8d63c9fed4fc6b1460f533b20f2
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7199
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Add a single new proc macro to a new proc-macro crate,
`tvix-eval-proc-macros` for defining an inline module containing nix
builtins, and automatically generating a function within that module
which returns a list of those builtins as `tvix_eval::value::Builtin`.
Change-Id: Ie4afae438914d2af93d15637151a49b4c68aa352
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7198
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: Idd4ae78ef55891d89b72b5c2f3afc8b697b4b26e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7189
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Adds initial placeholders for builtins.{derivation,
unsafeDiscardStringContext}.
Change-Id: I67a126c9b9f9f4f11e2256e69b9a32ebd9eb1b0e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7187
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
|
|
This is more generally useful than just inside the VM, until it is
stabilised in Rust itself.
Change-Id: Id9aa3d5b533ff38e3d2c6b85ad484394fdd05dcf
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7186
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
This fixes a mistake I made in d978b556e6.
Change-Id: I88db697105a7149e9785f6aface03bff68566d2b
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7085
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Scope_depth and with_stack_depth were being reset to zero for nested
function abstractions. Fortunately nothing depends on them being
computed correctly in these cases, but it sure was confusing.
Change-Id: I59980b6a5aff043f60079f97211220b0086eb97d
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7091
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
It is very confusing that this opcode is called DataLocalIdx, but it
carries a StackIdx rather than a LocalIdx. It seems like this
really ought to be called DataStackIdx, but maybe I've
misunderstood; if so please explain it to me.
Change-Id: I91f6ffa759412beef0b91d3c19ec0d873fe51b99
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7088
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I8c72405880a9342eb502d92c1e0087f5bb17e03c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7087
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
This implements builtins.split, and passes eval-okay-regex-split.nix
(which is moved out of notyetpassing).
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: Ieb0975da2058966c697ee0e2f5b3f26ccabfae57
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7143
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
|
|
We have to be careful implementing `builtins.groupBy`, since the
list may contain thunks, and tvix's to_xxx() functions do not work
on thunks.
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I182b6fc2d4296f864ed16744ef70b153e8e6978a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7039
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
The impl Display for NixAttrs needs to wrap double quotes around any
keys which are not valid Nix identifiers. This commit does that,
and adds a test (which fails prior to this commit and passes after
this commit).
Change-Id: Ie31ce91e8637cb27073f23f115db81feefdc6424
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7084
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|