about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/tvix/eval/src/value
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-09-10 r/4787 fix(tvix/eval): reintroduce 'InvalidAttribuetName' error variantVincent Ambo1-1/+5
As pointed out by sterni in cl/6205, this is actually possible in syntactically valid expressions like { ${12 + 13} = 12; } Change-Id: Id8a1e3aceb551f288f9050c4eea563eb6572f1a7 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6461 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-10 r/4786 fix(tvix/eval): fix doc comment syntax where applicableVincent Ambo3-31/+34
As pointed out by grfn on cl/6091 Change-Id: I28308577b7cf99dffb4a4fd3cc8783eb9ab4d0d6 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6460 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-08 r/4769 fix(tvix/eval): hold thunk borrow as shortly as possibleVincent Ambo1-7/+6
At the point where control flow exits Thunk::force (which may be due to recursing), it is vital that there is no longer a borrow to the inner thunk representation, otherwise this can cause accidental infinite recursion (which will be detected, but cause failures on valid code). Change-Id: I2846f3142830ae3110a4f5d2299e9d7928634504 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6436 Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-08 r/4749 fix(tvix/eval): don't panic when printing a black holeVincent Ambo1-2/+6
This could occur when the disassembler is enabled and tracing the runtime while a thunk is being evaluated, as it would not be possible for the *tracer* to borrow the thunk at this exact moment. However, we know that if the borrowing fails here we are dealing with a not-fully evaluated thunk (blackhole), which should just print the internal representation. Change-Id: I4bdb4f17818d55795368e3d28842048f488f0a91 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6416 Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-08 r/4748 refactor(tvix/eval): return call frame result from VM::callVincent Ambo1-2/+2
Previously, "calling" (setting up the VM run loop for executing a call frame) and "running" (running this loop to completion) were separate operations. This was basically an attempt to avoid nesting `VM::run` invocations. However, doing things this way introduced some tricky bugs for exiting out of the call frames of thunks vs. builtins & closures. For now, we unify the two operations and always return the value to the caller directly. For now this makes calls a little less effective, but it gives us a chance to nail down some other strange behaviours and then re-optimise this afterwards. To make sure we tackle this again further down I've added it to the list of known possible optimisations. Change-Id: I96828ab6a628136e0bac1bf03555faa4e6b74ece Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6415 Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-08 r/4745 refactor(tvix/eval): add macros for generating Value castersVincent Ambo1-62/+42
The casting methods of `Value` are pretty verbose, and actually incorrect before this commit as they did not account for inner thunk values. To address this, we first attempt to make them correct by introducing a standard macro to generate them and traverse the inner thunk(s) if necessary. This is likely to be a performance hit as it will now involve more cloning of values. We can do multiple things to alleviate this, but should do some measurements first. Change-Id: If315d6e2afe7b69db727df535bc6cbfb89a691aa Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6412 Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-08 r/4744 refactor(tvix/eval): pass a VM reference to builtinsVincent Ambo1-4/+14
This makes it possible for builtins to force values on their own, without the VM having to apply a strictness mask to the arguments first. Change-Id: Ib49a94e56ca2a8d515c39647381ab55a727766e3 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6411 Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-08 r/4742 fix(tvix/eval): thread thunk forcing errors through correctlyVincent Ambo1-3/+3
With this, if an error occurs while forcing a thunk (which is very likely) it is threaded through to the top by wrapping it in the ErrorKind::ThunkForce variant. We could use this to generate "stacktrace-like" error output if we wanted, or simply jump through and discard everything except the innermost error. Change-Id: I3c1c8708c2f73ae062815adf490ce935b1979da8 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6409 Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-08 r/4741 feat(tvix/eval): ensure all errors always carry a spanVincent Ambo4-64/+39
Previously error spans were optional because the information about code spans was not available at runtime. Now that this information has been added, the error type will always carry a span. This change is very invasive all throughout the codebase. This is due to the fact that many functions that are called *by* the VM expected to return `EvalResult`, but this no longer works as the span information is not available to those functions - only to the VM itself. To work around this the majority of these functions have been changed to return `Result<T, ErrorKind>` instead and an accompanying macro in the VM constructs the "real" error. Note that this implementatino currently has a bug where errors occuring within thunks will yield the location at which the thunk was forced, not the location at which the error occured within the code. This will be fixed soon, but the commit is large enough as is. Change-Id: Ib1ecb81a4d09d464a95ea7ea9e589f3bd08d5202 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6408 Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-07 r/4740 feat(tvix/eval): Support builtins.lengthWilliam Carroll2-0/+15
Get the length of a list Change-Id: I41d91e96d833269541a1b3c23b7cc879f96d1e5a Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6407 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-07 r/4706 fix(tvix/eval): address current clippy lintsVincent Ambo1-0/+1
Note that I've allowed `needless_lifetimes` for the attribute set iterator, as I find the type easier to understand with these annotations present. Change-Id: I33abb17837ee4813076cdb9a87f54bac4a37044e Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6373 Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-07 r/4704 feat(tvix/eval): implement NixList::iterVincent Ambo1-0/+4
This does not require a custom iterator type (for now?) Change-Id: I5beb194bd8629571bd4040c69c977c27149807fa Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6371 Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-07 r/4703 fix(tvix/eval): thread Display & PartialEq through to thunk valuesVincent Ambo2-1/+21
If a thunk is already evaluated, there are cases where due to the memoisation implementation something might observe a value wrapped in a thunk. In these cases, the implementation of `Display` and `PartialEq` must delegate to the underlying value. Note that there are a handful of other cases like these which we need to cover. It is a little tricky to write integration tests for these directly, especially as some of the open-upvalue optimisations coming down the pipe will reduce the number of observable thunks. One test that covers a part of this behaviour is currently disabled (needs some more machinery), but it's being brought back in the next commits. Change-Id: Iaa8cd338c12236af844bbc99d8cec2205f0d0095 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6370 Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-07 r/4702 feat(tvix/eval): implement NixAttrs::iter()Vincent Ambo2-1/+121
Implementing iteration over NixAttrs requires a custom iterator type in order to encapsulate the different representations. The BTreeMap for example has its own iterator type which needs to be encapsulated. This is mostly boilerplate code, but for a change some simple unit tests have been added in. Change-Id: Ie13b063241d461b810876f95f53878388e918ef2 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6367 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-07 r/4701 chore(tvix/eval): provide 'static references to "name"/"value"Vincent Ambo1-0/+3
These static strings show up a bunch when dealing with the internals of attribute sets, and having them available as static references is required. Due to the way const expressions are evaluated, taking a reference to the existing NixString::NAME / NixString::VALUE items does not work and the references themselves need to be const-evaluated. Change-Id: If6e75847af978118a3b266fe6a3242321722434d Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6366 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-07 r/4700 refactor(tvix/eval): encapsulate all thunk-forcing logic in moduleVincent Ambo1-20/+41
The VM previously took care of repeatedly forcing a thunk until it reached an evaluated state. This logic is now encapsulated inside of the `Thunk::force` implementation. In addition, force no longer returns a reference to the value by default, leaving it up to callers to decide whether they want to borrow the value or not (a helper is provided for this). Change-Id: I2aa7da922058ad1c57fbf8bfc7785aab7971c02b Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6365 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-07 r/4688 feat(tvix/eval): implement OpForce in VMVincent Ambo1-1/+31
This operation forces the evaluation of a thunk. There is some potential here for making an implementation that avoids some copies, but the thunk machinery is tricky to get right so the first priority is to make sure it is correct by keeping the implementation simple. Change-Id: Ib381455b02f42ded717faff63f55afed4c8fb7e3 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6352 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-06 r/4682 fix(tvix/eval): allocate Thunk::upvalues with known capacityVincent Ambo1-1/+1
The capacity (i.e. number of builtins) is known from the lambda, so we can size it correctly right away. Change-Id: Iab0b5a3f47d450fa9866c091ebbbed935b934907 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6351 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-06 r/4677 refactor(tvix/eval): introduce UpvalueCarrier traitVincent Ambo2-18/+40
This trait abstracts over the commonalities of upvalue handling between closures and thunks. It allows the VM to simplify the code used for setting up upvalues, without duplicating between the two different types. Note that this does not yet refactor the VM code to optimally make use of this. Change-Id: If8de5181f26ae1fa00d554f1ae6ea473ee4b6070 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6347 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-06 r/4676 refactor(tvix/eval): simplify thunk representationsVincent Ambo1-7/+7
For now, do not distinguish between closing and non-closing thunks, it will make the initial implementation easier. See Knuth etc. Change-Id: I0bd51e0f89f2c77e90bac63b507e5027b649e3d8 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6346 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-06 r/4673 feat(tvix/eval): introduce Value::Thunk variantVincent Ambo2-1/+61
Introduces the representation of runtime thunks, that is lazily evaluated values. Their representation is very similar to closures. Change-Id: I24d1ab7947c070ae72ca6260a7bbe6198bc8c7c5 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6343 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-06 r/4667 feat(tvix/eval): implement OpFinalise instructionVincent Ambo1-0/+11
This instruction finalises the initialisation of deferred upvalues in closures (and soon, thunks). The compiler does not yet emit this instruction, some more accounting is needed for that. Change-Id: Ic4181b26e19779e206f51e17388559400da5f93a Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6337 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-06 r/4666 feat(tvix/eval): set up deferred upvalues at runtimeVincent Ambo1-1/+5
This will leave a sentinel value in the upvalue slot in which the actual value is to be captured after resolution once a scope is fully set up. Change-Id: I12b37b0dc8d32603b03e675c3bd039468e70b354 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6336 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-06 r/4659 fix(tvix/eval): instantiate *new* closures from blueprints each timeVincent Ambo2-5/+8
The previous closure refactoring introduced a bug in which the same closure object would get mutated constantly for each instance of a closure, which is incorrect behaviour. This commit instead introduces an explicit new Value variant for the internal "blueprint" that the compiler generates (essentially just the lambda) and uses this variant to construct the closure at runtime. If the blueprint ever leaks out to a user somehow that is a critical bug and tvix-eval will panic. As a ~treat~ test for this, the fibonacci function is being used as it is a self-recursive closure (i.e. different instantiations of the same "blueprint") getting called with different values and it's good to have it around. Change-Id: I485de675e9bb0c599ed7d5dc0f001eb34ab4c15f Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6323 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-06 r/4658 fix(tvix/eval): correctly thread through dynamic upvaluesVincent Ambo1-1/+7
This puts together the puzzle pieces for threading dynamic upvalues (that is, upvalues resolved from the `with`-stack) all the way through. Reading the test case enclosed in this commit and walking through it is recommended to understand what problem is being tackled here. In short, because the compiler can not statically know *which* with-scope a dynamic argument is resolved from it needs to lay the groundwork for resolving from *all* possible scopes. There are multiple different approaches to doing this. The approach chosen in this commit is that if a dynamic upvalue is detected, the compiler will emit instructions to close over this dynamic value in *all* enclosing lambda contexts. It uses a new instruction for this that will leave around a sentinel value in case an identifier could not be resolved, and wire the location of this found value (or sentinel) up through the upvalues to the next level of nesting. In this tradeoff, tvix potentially closes over more upvalues than are needed (but in practice, how often do people create *really* deep `with`-stacks? and in *this* kind of code situation? maybe we should even warn for this!) but avoids keeping the entire attribute sets themselves around. Looking at the test case, each surrounding closure will close over *all* dynamic identifiers that are referenced later on visible to it, but only the last one for each identifier will actually end up being used. This also covers our bases for an additional edge-case this creates, in which an identifier potentially resolves to a dynamic upvalue *and* to a dynamic value within the function's own scope (again, would anyone really do this?) by introducing a resolution instruction for that particular case. There is likely some potential for cleaning up this code which is quite ugly in some parts, but as this implementation is now carefully calibrated to work I decided it is time to commit it and clean it up in subsequent commits. Change-Id: Ib701e3e6da39bd2c95938d1384036ff4f9fb3749 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6322 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-06 r/4651 refactor(tvix/eval): encapsulate internal mutability within ClosureVincent Ambo1-7/+30
This is required to efficiently construct the upvalue array at runtime, as there are situations where during Closure construction multiple things already have a reference to the closure (e.g. a self-reference). Change-Id: I35263b845fdc695dc873de489f5168d39b370f6a Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6312 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-04 r/4635 feat(tvix/eval): implement upvalue resolution in `with` scopesVincent Ambo2-0/+17
These need to be handled specially by the runtime if the compiler determines that a given local must be resolved via `with`. Note that this implementation has a bug: It currently allows `with` inside of nested lambdas to shadow statically known identifiers. This will be cleaned up in the next commit. Change-Id: If196b99cbd1a0f2dbb4a40a0e88cdb09a009c6b9 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6299 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-03 r/4626 feat(tvix/eval): add Value::to_closureVincent Ambo1-0/+11
... same as the others Change-Id: I9c8868388c10b0b6484c5bdd3799d801296c6979 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6292 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
2022-09-03 r/4625 feat(tvix/eval): compile creation of closure objectsVincent Ambo1-1/+11
Fully implements the instructions for compiling closure objects (without runtime handling yet). Closure (and thunk) objects are created at runtime by capturing all known upvalues. To represent this, the instructions for creating them need to have a variable number of arguments. Due to that, this commit introduces new variants in OpCode that are not actually operations, but data. If the VM is implemented correctly, the instruction pointer should never point at these. Due to this, the VM will panic if it sees a data operand during an execution run. Change-Id: Ic56b49b3a42736dc437751e76df0e89c8d0619c6 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6291 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
2022-09-03 r/4623 feat(tvix/eval): implement compilation of upvalue accessVincent Ambo1-0/+2
This adds a new upvalue tracking structure in the compiler to resolve upvalues and track their positions within a function when compiling a closure. The compiler will emit runtime upvalue access instructions after this commit, but the creation of the runtime closure object etc. is not yet wired up. Change-Id: Ib0c2c25f686bfd45f797c528753068858e3a770d Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6289 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
2022-09-03 r/4616 refactor(tvix/eval): avoid cloning in NixAttrs::update if possibleVincent Ambo1-20/+27
Refactors the update function to take the attribute sets by value instead. To facilitate this, we use an equivalent of the currently unstable `Rc::clone_or_unwrap` in the VM when encountering attribute sets, so that in cases where the only references to the attrs being updated are the ones on the stack those clones are avoided completely. This does make update() a little bit more tricky internally, as some optimised branches can directly return the moved value, and others need to destructure with ownership. For this reason there are now two different match statements handling the different ownership cases. Change-Id: Ia77d3ba5c86afb75b9f1f51758bda61729ba5aab Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6279 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-03 r/4614 refactor(tvix/eval): slightly more readable AttrsRep::selectVincent Ambo1-11/+5
Suggestion from grfn in cl/6158. Change-Id: I16dcf2296a5ec5d299d5a080ca099b8eda6c254e Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6278 Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-03 r/4613 refactor(tvix/eval): rename Value::NotFound & OpAttrOrNotFoundVincent Ambo1-3/+3
grfn suggested clearer naming for these in cl/6166. Change-Id: I83164bf1d1902ebd42272e9d5d63819a0f6a72c5 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6277 Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-03 r/4611 refactor(tvix/eval): get rid of Value::Blackhole variantVincent Ambo2-5/+3
This is no longer needed for anything and the extra clone here is not really more costly than constructing a blackhole value in a different place. Change-Id: I5c63085b1b4418b629ea58a42e3bfe9a9b586d76 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6275 Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-03 r/4608 fix(tvix/eval): address all current clippy lintsVincent Ambo2-2/+2
Change-Id: I758fc4f3b9078de7ca6228a75a4351c3e085c4cf Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6272 Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-03 r/4607 fix(tvix/eval): correctly escape `${` in stringsVincent Ambo1-11/+15
Without this escape, it is possible for Nix to produce escaped representations which are not literal Nix values again. This was fixed in upstream Nix in https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/4012 (though only for eval, not in the REPL) and the updated test is picked from upstream after that commit. Because we run the C++ Nix tests against our test suite as well, this also bumps our custom Nix 2.3 to a commit that includes the cherry-picked fix from the PR above. Change-Id: I478547ade65f655c606ec46f7143932064192283 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6271 Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi> Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-03 r/4605 refactor(tvix/eval): introduce Closure struct in Value typeVincent Ambo2-5/+10
This struct will carry the upvalue machinery in addition to the lambda itself. For now, all lambdas are wrapped in closures (though technically analysis of the environment can later remove innermost Closure wrapper, but this optimisation may not be worth it). Change-Id: If2b68549ec1ea4ab838fdc47a2181c694ac937f2 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6269 Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-02 r/4601 refactor(tvix/eval): avoid a use of Value::BlackholeVincent Ambo1-2/+2
The blackhole allocation is not going to be cheaper than cloning this. Change-Id: Id3ad44812decb4392830be06645e67bb0a982b96 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6267 Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-09-02 r/4597 refactor(tvix/eval): add NixAttrs::contains functionVincent Ambo1-0/+12
This avoids copying around the value more than needed. Change-Id: I35949d16dad7fb8f76e0f641eaccf48322144777 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6263 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-02 r/4596 feat(tvix/eval): implement builtins.catAttrsVincent Ambo1-0/+4
Change-Id: Idf92ac82438fbfcf7b2f6e058830e4744637d8c6 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6262 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-02 r/4592 refactor(tvix/eval): implement clearer mechanism for globalsVincent Ambo1-0/+8
The set of things that can leak out of `builtins` into the global scope is statically known (it is what Nix 2.3 leaks there, essentially). This is a mild change over the previous mechanism, where instead at the point where the `builtins` set is constructed we "lift" the globals out of there (if they exist). This way users will still eventually be able to add additional builtins, HOWEVER they will not be able to leak them into the global scope. Note that upstream Nix technically leaks _all_ builtins into the global scope using the `__*` prefix, but we are trying to avoid this in Tvix if it is not required in nixpkgs. Change-Id: Ie9dec2ce33740134f3b2464eba3749f421dd5953 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6258 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-02 r/4588 feat(tvix/eval): introduce mechanism for defining builtinsVincent Ambo1-0/+13
Adds a new builtins module in which builtins can be constructed. The functions in this module should return a correctly structured value to be passed to the compiler's `globals`. This is wired up all the way to the compiler with an example `toString` builtin, available as a global. Note that this does not yet actually behave like the real toString, which has some differences from `Display`. Change-Id: Ibb5f6fbe6207782fdf2434435567fc1bd80039a5 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6254 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
2022-09-02 r/4585 feat(tvix/eval): add initial representation of builtinsVincent Ambo2-1/+71
Builtins are represented as a Rust function pointer that accepts a vector of arguments, which represents variable arity builtins. Change-Id: Ibab7e662a646caf1172695d876d2f55e187c03dd Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6251 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
2022-09-01 r/4576 refactor(tvix/eval): return a lambda from the compilerVincent Ambo1-4/+15
Changes the internal compiler plumbing to not just return a chunk of code, but the same chunk wrapped inside of a lambda value. This is one more step towards compiling runtime lambdas. Change-Id: If0035f8e65a2970c5ae123fc068a2396e1d8fd72 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6240 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
2022-09-01 r/4574 feat(tvix/eval): introduce initial `Lambda` typeVincent Ambo2-0/+18
Change-Id: Ifa9766f5ffeff99e926936bafd697e885e733b78 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6238 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
2022-09-01 r/4571 feat(tvix/eval): carry optional SyntaxNode in error typeVincent Ambo2-16/+23
This starts paving the way for nicer, source-code based error reporting. Right now the code paths in the VM do not emit annotated errors, as we do not yet preserve that structure from the compiler. However, error emitting code paths in the compiler have been amended to include known nodes. Change-Id: I1b74410ffd891c40cd913361bd73c4336ec8aa5b Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6235 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
2022-09-01 r/4568 fix(tvix/eval): fix several string escapingsVincent Ambo1-2/+4
These were missing an additional level of escaping, silly oversight caught by an upstream test. Change-Id: I0312084475e4b88c83945614e9aa5b34c6bc3ec2 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6232 Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-08-31 r/4555 feat(tvix/eval): add Value::as_attrs methodVincent Ambo1-0/+10
Change-Id: I2f39122ac85b67837335aab308d845907160e132 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6221 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
2022-08-30 r/4542 fix(tvix/eval): allow use of ? operator on non-set typesVincent Ambo1-1/+1
Nix allows this, but always returns false. Tvix needs to do the same. Change-Id: Ic9eec90834a0d0969eea5316d5c25032d3691d94 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6209 Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2022-08-30 r/4541 fix(tvix/eval): emit correct count in OpAttrPathVincent Ambo1-1/+1
Not sure how exactly this snuck in, but it caused some subtle breakages in deeply nested attribute sets. Change-Id: I8049ce912405d3750031f79cc8d86ff1c3c02c2b Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6208 Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
generated by cgit-pink 1.4.1 (git 2.44.2) at 2024-10-30T12·20+0000