| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Change-Id: Ic4700f0618a393e45a2ee7c70045edff97e30c49
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6493
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
The recent change that split declaration of let based locals and the
compilation of their values did not touch locals bound by inherit in
let. These were previously declared and compiled immediately before
starting to work on the other locals introduced in a let.
In the case of plain inherits, this behavior is kept in this change,
because there's nothing wrong with it: The value of a plain inherit will
always resolve to a higher scope, either statically or dynamically.
Since inherit (from) expression might refer to other locals bound in the
same let, we need to handle them in the same three steps as ordinary let
based locals:
1. We need to declare the (uninitialised) locals.
2. We need to compile the expression that obtains their value. For this,
we create a new thunk, since the from expression may very well return
a thunk which we need to force before selecting the value we are
interested in.
3. Thunks need to be finalised.
For 1., we create an extra pass over the inherits that already declares
and initialises plain inherits and notes inherit (from) expressions in
the entries vector after declaring them. 2. only needs a bit of adapting
to create the thunks for selecting if appropriate, the rest of the
existing code can be reused.
Change-Id: Ie4ac1c0f9ffcbf7c07c452036aa8e577443af773
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6490
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
With this all other "weird scope" logic starts working for `with` as
well.
Change-Id: I0ea1d8c5fbd9cec5084bd574224f77b71ff2b487
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6487
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
Similarly to attribute sets, list elements can be arbitrary
expressions and their (temporary) stack slots during construction must
be accounted for by the compiler.
Change-Id: I3b6f7927860627fd867c64d0cab9104fd636d4f5
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6470
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
The temporaries left on the stack as operands to `OpAttrs` must be
accounted for in the locals array in order for operations within them
to receive correct slots.
Some test cases that were previously broken have been added.
Change-Id: Ib52b629bbdf7931f63fd45a45af1073022da923c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6468
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
With this, most cases of `fix` in attribute sets will work correctly.
A simple test exercising both has been added.
Change-Id: I70fd431177bb6e48ecb33a87518b050c4c3d1c09
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6437
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This was fixed by some of the previous commits around scopes. It's
somewhat similar to a few other tests, but I had this one failing
earlier and everything else succeeding, so it is useful to keep it
around for sure.
Change-Id: Ie6cf372b5c805daf992cd87aeb3dfe91542c381c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6431
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Deferred local upvalues can *only* occur at the same depth as the
thing that is closing over them, but there are various situations with
scope nesting where the actual stack indexes of the local and the
closer look like a deferred value is being accessed.
To fix this, simply compare the depth as well.
Change-Id: Ice77424cc87ab0a2c4f01379e68d4399a917b12b
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6429
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This is the same as `eval-okay-attrs-simple-inherit`.
Change-Id: I23878accc6cd62c16ec96601239838a385d31306
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6428
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Scope poisoning must be inherited across lambda context boundaries,
e.g. if an outer scope has a poisoned `null`, any lambdas defined on
the same level must reference that poisoned identifier correctly.
Change-Id: I1aac64e1c048a6f3bacadb6d78ed295fa439e8b4
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6410
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Get the length of a list
Change-Id: I41d91e96d833269541a1b3c23b7cc879f96d1e5a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6407
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
Multiplication and division :)
Change-Id: I79e76f3b55b7e9b8d1eb09b3d9741140b4d75742
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6406
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
First pass at supporting `builtins` for tvix. The following tests appear to be
WAI:
```shell
$ cd tvix/eval
$ cargo build
$ cargo test
```
Change-Id: I27cce23d503b17a886d1109e285e8b4be4264977
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6405
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
This essentially makes the VM behave like `nix-instantiate --eval
--strict`, i.e. data structures are traversed strictly and thunks are
forced. Thunks embedded in closures are not forced.
This allows us to re-enable tests that were disabled because they
needed to output nested thunk contents, but is overall a behaviour
that must be configurable later on, as it is not cmopatible with e.g.
an evaluation of nixpkgs.
Change-Id: I5303a5c8e4322feab1384fdb7712fecb950afca5
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6372
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This thunks the construction of attribute sets. Because Tvix does not
currently have a "strict output" mode, a test had to be disabled that
now displays a thunk representation.
The test will be re-enabled once that is available.
Change-Id: I360332be64cd5c154f9caea21828f6f1b37a265c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6363
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
This is the simplest kind of thunk that can be created (and so far the
only one the compiler knows how to create), in which an identifier
inside a `let` encounters a value that is bound *after* it is
initialised.
Change-Id: I6ea4408a3baef1e7d5137365d70804283f2dbf8e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6354
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Id70c987f654dc5d9b47db74e395281309762b468
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6353
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
This test case was previously broken by the bug introduced by
confusing local and stack indexes.
Change-Id: Ibef299dad266c6105deac1da5dde112fe9f640b1
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6341
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
With this change, the runtime can correctly capture deferred upvalues.
Change-Id: I1e43b7b1ac2553b1812424adfc8bd08ef77bf1ea
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6339
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
The previous closure refactoring introduced a bug in which the same
closure object would get mutated constantly for each instance of a
closure, which is incorrect behaviour.
This commit instead introduces an explicit new Value variant for the
internal "blueprint" that the compiler generates (essentially just the
lambda) and uses this variant to construct the closure at runtime.
If the blueprint ever leaks out to a user somehow that is a critical
bug and tvix-eval will panic.
As a ~treat~ test for this, the fibonacci function is being used as it
is a self-recursive closure (i.e. different instantiations of the same
"blueprint") getting called with different values and it's good to
have it around.
Change-Id: I485de675e9bb0c599ed7d5dc0f001eb34ab4c15f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6323
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
This puts together the puzzle pieces for threading dynamic
upvalues (that is, upvalues resolved from the `with`-stack) all the
way through.
Reading the test case enclosed in this commit and walking through it
is recommended to understand what problem is being tackled here.
In short, because the compiler can not statically know *which*
with-scope a dynamic argument is resolved from it needs to lay the
groundwork for resolving from *all* possible scopes.
There are multiple different approaches to doing this. The approach
chosen in this commit is that if a dynamic upvalue is detected, the
compiler will emit instructions to close over this dynamic value
in *all* enclosing lambda contexts.
It uses a new instruction for this that will leave around a sentinel
value in case an identifier could not be resolved, and wire the
location of this found value (or sentinel) up through the upvalues to
the next level of nesting.
In this tradeoff, tvix potentially closes over more upvalues than are
needed (but in practice, how often do people create *really* deep
`with`-stacks? and in *this* kind of code situation? maybe we should
even warn for this!) but avoids keeping the entire attribute sets
themselves around.
Looking at the test case, each surrounding closure will close
over *all* dynamic identifiers that are referenced later on visible to
it, but only the last one for each identifier will actually end up
being used.
This also covers our bases for an additional edge-case this creates,
in which an identifier potentially resolves to a dynamic upvalue *and*
to a dynamic value within the function's own scope (again, would
anyone really do this?) by introducing a resolution instruction for
that particular case.
There is likely some potential for cleaning up this code which is
quite ugly in some parts, but as this implementation is now carefully
calibrated to work I decided it is time to commit it and clean it up
in subsequent commits.
Change-Id: Ib701e3e6da39bd2c95938d1384036ff4f9fb3749
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6322
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
This does not yet correctly resolve them if they are more than one
scope up, however.
Change-Id: I6687073c60aee0282f2b6ffc98b34c1e96a60f20
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6319
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
With this change, it becomes possible for functions to call themselves
as they are being defined in local bindings.
Change-Id: Ib46a39ba17b1452b5673d96fa729d633d237241a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6314
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
These need to be handled specially by the runtime if the compiler
determines that a given local must be resolved via `with`.
Note that this implementation has a bug: It currently allows `with`
inside of nested lambdas to shadow statically known identifiers. This
will be cleaned up in the next commit.
Change-Id: If196b99cbd1a0f2dbb4a40a0e88cdb09a009c6b9
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6299
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ib8287ade4d5df6d29e1812fb2d349cee5d92ca6a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6296
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I4893a37719b9bf08b35963d48e6851a194a08aa7
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6274
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Without this escape, it is possible for Nix to produce escaped
representations which are not literal Nix values again.
This was fixed in upstream Nix in
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/4012 (though only for eval, not in
the REPL) and the updated test is picked from upstream after that commit.
Because we run the C++ Nix tests against our test suite as well, this
also bumps our custom Nix 2.3 to a commit that includes the
cherry-picked fix from the PR above.
Change-Id: I478547ade65f655c606ec46f7143932064192283
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6271
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
In conditions where no dynamic identifiers exist in a scope,
inheriting is usually a no-op - *unless* the identifier is not
statically known and the scope has a non-empty `with`-stack.
Change-Id: Iff4138d9cd4c56e844bc574203708dacc11c3f73
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6264
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I91f54778b8a17f3448664c21308de656b4b04b3e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6255
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I1b9230601895a1f09ef1a8037201147020b85f36
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6250
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This makes for much more readable output especially when long strings
are involved.
Change-Id: I43dd73a0480535d7181a760788c42883a9b083f8
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6229
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
These tokens are optionally parsed as identifiers by Nix, which means
that within any scopes that resolve them the compiler needs to track
whether they have been overridden to know whether to emit the literal
instructions or resolve a variable.
This is implemented by a new concept of "scope poisoning", where the
compiler's scope structure tracks whether or not any builtin
identifiers have been overridden.
Change-Id: I3ab711146e229f843f6e1f0343385382ee0aecb6
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6227
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
|
|
While full recursion through thunking is not available, there are
actually incorrect behaviours introduced by declaring before
binding (example in the newly introduced test).
This commit simplifies the implementation to avoid this issue, and
also because I intend to explore a bit more how far we can get in non
left-to-right bindings *without* introducing thunks immediately.
Change-Id: I21fd3007ac3946570639772d7d624d70bd209958
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6226
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
|
|
Change-Id: I94664090e7a2b060dfbe21c1eeb859fb31e417b0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6225
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
|
|
Note that at this point recursive bindings do not yet work in either
attrsets or let, so inheriting from the same scope is generally not
possible yet.
Change-Id: I6ca820d04b8ded5c22fb7ea18e2ec203bcaa8e9c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6215
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Straightforward implementation, evaluating the elements of an inherit
and preparing the stack so that `OpAttrs` sees all relevant values
when constructing the attribute set itself.
The emitted instructions for inheriting a lot of values from the same
attribute set are inefficient, but it's too early to say whether this
actually matters.
Change-Id: Icb55a20936d4ef77173f34433811c5fa5d2c9ecc
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6214
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I97fa45059b7f2cbe96eb60bd1821e3e25832df66
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6212
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Using `OpAttrSelect`, the ? operator will fail when encountering a
nested value that is not an attribute set.
This however breaks valid code, such as:
{ bs = 42; } ? bs.a.b
The fix is simply to use the same operator used in the `or` statement,
which leaves a sentinal on the stack if a field is not found or the
value is not an attribute set.
Change-Id: Ib28fc8a96e6d592b4cdbc3e65ba129ad8faecd66
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6211
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
If a nested attrpath encounters a non-set value, the sentinel value
denoting a lack of next values should be emitted. This mirrors the
behaviour of Nix.
Change-Id: Ia80443d5a11243cc6d98dcab1249a3f5fdf77e27
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6210
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Nix allows this, but always returns false. Tvix needs to do the same.
Change-Id: Ic9eec90834a0d0969eea5316d5c25032d3691d94
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6209
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Not sure how exactly this snuck in, but it caused some subtle
breakages in deeply nested attribute sets.
Change-Id: I8049ce912405d3750031f79cc8d86ff1c3c02c2b
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6208
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I788504f0c1848a1422c99006bf659738df614716
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6191
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
|
|
Resolves relative paths (e.g. `./foo`) either relative to the location
of the Nix file, or relative to the working directory if none is
supplied.
Change-Id: I70ec574657b221b458015117a004b6e4a9c25a30
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6185
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I8428a82db9bf7af5c0273178acbf3e4d7355f5d9
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6153
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Change-Id: I81f3ab94d8b987f5a4c87a27b2bcbb49cccee1ce
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6168
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Icdf715d116371a9f139bdf95266410bf967bef25
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6144
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This is accomplished by simply delegating to the Rust implementations
of (Partial)Ord and (Partial)Eq, which are implemented for Value and
underlying wrapper types to behave like they do in Nix.
To ease the implementation overhead, a new comparison operator macro
has been added to the VM module.
Incomparable types will raise a new error variant when a comparison is
attempted, containing both supplied types. This mimics the information
carried in the error thrown by C++ Nix.
Change-Id: Ia19634d69119d40722f3ca672387bc3a80096998
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6143
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: Ic259d6d0cf30553e944682a0d1d2c610df7fe5c2
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6141
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
The underlying implementation does a few tricks based on which pair of
attrset representations is encountered.
Particularly the effect of short-circuiting the empty cases might be
relevant in nixpkgs/NixOS, due to the use of lib.optionalAttrs.
Change-Id: I22b978b1c69af12926489a71087c6a6219c012f3
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6140
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: If61066e59232b2bad42b5cb5f0f2d9b9c416be8b
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6137
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
