| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This explicitly documents behavior of C++ Nix that goes against the
intuition you'd gather from this document: that e.g. a simple select
from an attribute set causes a value to no longer be pointer equal to
its former self.
The point of documenting this is that we can show in a to be written
section on the use of pointer equality in nixpkgs that pointer equality
is only needed in a limited sense for evaluating it (C++ Nix's exterior
pointer equality). Tvix's pointer equality is far more powerful since
value identity preserving operations also preserve pointer equality,
generally speaking (this is because we implement interior pointer
equality in my made up terminology). This should eventually also be
documented.
Change-Id: I6ce7ef2d67b012f5ebc92f9e81bba33fb9dce7d0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8856
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
This fixes a subtle issue which would occasionally lead to a crash (e.g.
when evaluating (pkgs.systemd.outPath with --trace-runtime): With each
character in the string that has a multi byte representation in UTF-8,
the actual byte position and what tvix thought it was would get out of
sync. This could either lead to
* Tvix swallowing characters or jumbling characters if multi byte
characters would cause the tracked index to become out of sync with
the byte position before the first character to be escaped, or
* Tvix crashing if (in the same situation) the out of sync index would
be within a UTF-8 byte sequence.
Luckily, std's `char_indices()` iterator implements exactly what
`nix_escape_char()`'s original author had in mind with
`.chars().enumerate()`. Using `i + 1` for continuing is safe, since all
characters that need (in fact, can) to be escaped in Nix are represented
as a single byte in UTF-8.
Change-Id: I1c836f70cde3d72db1c644e9112852f0d824715e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8952
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
I've noticed this behavior when writing the admittedly cursed test case
included in this CL. Alternatively we could use some sort of machinery
using `builtins.trace`, but I don't think we capture stderr anywhere.
I've elected to put this into the eval cache itself while C++ Nix does
it in builtins.import already, namely via `realisePath`. We don't have
an equivalent for this yet, since we don't support any kind of IfD, but
we could revise that later. In any case, it seems good to encapsulate
`ImportCache` in this way, as it'll also allow using file hashes as
identifiers, for example.
C++ Nix also does our equivalent of canon_path in `builtins.import`
which we still don't, but I suspect it hardly makes a difference.
Change-Id: I05004737ca2458a4c67359d9e7d9a2f2154a0a0f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8839
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
When dealing with a formal argument in a function argument pattern that
has a default expression, there are two different things that can happen
at runtime: Either we select its value from the passed attribute
successfully or we need to use the default expression. Both of these may
be thunks and both of these may need finalisers. However, in the former
case this is taken care of elsewhere, the value will always be finalised
already if necessary. In the latter case we may need to finalise the
thunk resulting from the default expression. However, the thunk
corresponding to the expression may never end up in the local's stack
slot. Since finalisation goes by stack slot (and not constants), we need
to prevent a case where we don't fall back to the default expression,
but finalise anyways.
Previously, we worked around this by making `OpFinalise` ignore
non-thunks. Since finalisation of already evaluated thunks still
crashed, the faulty compilation of function pattern arguments could
still cause a crash.
As a new approach, we reinstate the old behavior of `OpFinalise` to
crash whenever encountering something that is either not a thunk or
doesn't need finalisation. This can also help catching (similar)
miscompilations in the future. To then prevent the crash, we need to
track whether we have fallen back or not at runtime. This is done using
an additional phantom on the stack that holds a new `FinaliseRequest`
value. When it comes to finalisation we check this value and
conditionally execute `OpFinalise` based on its value.
Resolves b/261 and b/265 (partially).
Change-Id: Ic04fb80ec671a2ba11fa645090769c335fb7f58b
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8705
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
genericClosure has very limited support for pointer equality: It relies
on comparison (not equality!) in C++ Nix, so as soon as C++ Nix supports
comparing lists (langVersion >= 6) we can rely on pointer equality for
key.
Since Tvix uses equality, not comparison for the insert, our behavior is
currently different, as documented by the notyetpassing tests.
Change-Id: Ifcd741ed4fc3ccc3825f7038875d56a9918b786a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8720
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
In order for the test suite we have currently to be comparable to C++
Nix, we need to display values in the same way. This was largely the
case except in some weird cases.
* <CODE> for thunks and <CYCLE> for repeated thunks (?) are already in
use. <CODE> formatting is tested by the oracle test suite already.
* Instead of lambda, we need to use <LAMBDA>
* <<primop>> and <<primop-app>> (a formatting C++ Nix uses nowhere)
now are <PRIMOP> and <PRIMOP-APP>.
We'll probably want to have a fancier display of values (in a separate
trait) down the line. This could be used for interactive usage, e.g. the
REPL or a potential debugger.
There is a peculiarity with C++ Nix 2.3 formatting primops: import is
considered a <<PRIMOP-APP>>, since it is internally implemented by means
of scopedImport. This implementation detail no longer leaks in C++ Nix
2.13 nor in Tvix.
<CYCLE> display is untested at the moment, since we exhibit a
discrepancy to C++ Nix 2.3. Our current detection is more similar to C++
Nix 2.13—luckily it is also the more consistent of the two. See also
b/245.
Change-Id: I1d534434b02e470bf5475b3758920ea81e3420dc
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8760
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
These were added by us in r/5276, so they should go into our test suite.
Change-Id: I6dc74fc242f33c22a17e0b4aee546ccae886ac85
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8774
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
Unsupported by Tvix at the moment. Documents b/280.
Change-Id: I48844feeefa9da8ed7e5d85300d52bb5650f82d2
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8772
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ie8b97d174e9d58e33bf08c9b9e0afeeddd089ba8
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8700
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
C++ Nix forces and typechecks the passed argument even if it is not
necessary in order to compute the return value of the function. I
discovered this when I thought our formals miscompilation might be that
we are too strict, but doesn't look like it in this case.
Change-Id: Ifb3c92592293052c489d1e3ae8c7c54e4b6b4dc6
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8701
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
mapAttrs, map and genList call Nix functions provided by the caller and
store the result of applying them in a Nix data structure that does not
force all of its contents when forced itself. This means that when such
a builtin application is forced, the Nix function calls performed by the
builtin should not be forced: They may be forced later, but it is also
possible that they will never be forced, e.g. in
builtins.length (builtins.map (builtins.add 2) [ 1 2 3 ])
it is not necessary to compute a single application of builtins.add.
Since request_call_with immediately performs the function call
requested, Tvix would compute function applications unnecessarily before
this change. Because this was not followed by a request_force, the
impact of this was relatively low in Nix code (most functions return a
new thunk after being applied), but it was enough to cause a lot of
bogus builtins.trace applications when evaluating anything from
`lib.modules`. The newly added test includes many cases where Tvix
previously incorrectly applied a builtin, breaking a working expression.
To fix this we add a new helper to construct a Thunk performing a
function application at runtime from a function and argument given as
`Value`s. This mimics the compiler's compile_apply(), but does itself
not require a compiler, since the necessary Lambda can be constructed
independently.
I also looked into other builtins that call a Nix function to verify
that they don't exhibit such a problem:
- Many builtins immediately use the resulting value in a way that makes
it necessary to compute all the function calls they do as soon as
the outer builtin application is forced:
* all
* any
* filter
* groupBy
* partition
- concatMap needs to (shallowly) force the returned list for
concatenation.
- foldl' is strict in the application of `op` (I added a comment that
makes this explicit).
- genericClosure needs to (shallowly) force the resulting list and some
keys of the attribute sets inside.
Resolves b/272.
Change-Id: I1fa53f744bcffc035da84c1f97ed25d146830446
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8651
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
This actually uses coercion under the hood in C++ Nix. See the test
for an example.
Change-Id: Id56b364acf269225b6829d0b600e0222f8b3608d
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8322
Reviewed-by: andi <andi@notmuch.email>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
These are serialised as the serialisation of the value of that field.
Change-Id: Ida51708b1f43ce09b0ec835f4e265918aa31dd09
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8205
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
These must be serialised to a JSON string of the *result* of coercing
the function application to a string.
Change-Id: Ib7f49ccd950503ddbdbf99643cd59565e26b50da
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8204
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Formals can be initialised with deferred default values (see the test
cases), in which case they need an extra thunk to have something that
can be finalised appropriately when the setup is done.
Fixes: b/255
Change-Id: I380e3770be68eaa83ace96d450c7cead32dacc9f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8196
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
|
|
Change-Id: Ief20544a44c3542fe40a5c09f81d0f064a346f44
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8149
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
|
|
Formals can depend on each other when using another formal as a
default value.
This test ensures that the compiler's declaration and initialisation
order of formals is consistent with what actually happens in the VM.
Change-Id: Ibdabe262554e8066d67fac1ebc3b5a48ef626e18
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7948
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
|
|
Apparently our naive implementation of float formatting, which simply
used {:.5}, and trimmed trailing "0" strings not sufficient.
It wrongly trimmed numbers with zeroes but no decimal point, like
`10000` got trimmed to `1`.
Nix uses `std::to_string` on the double, which according to
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/string/basic_string/to_string
is equivalent to `std::sprintf(buf, "%f", value)`.
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/io/c/fprintf mentions this is treated
like this:
> Precision specifies the exact number of digits to appear after
> the decimal point character. The default precision is 6. In the
> alternative implementation decimal point character is written even if
> no digits follow it. For infinity and not-a-number conversion style
> see notes.
This doesn't seem to be the case though, and Nix uses scientific
notation in some cases.
There's a whole bunch of strategies to determine which is a more compact
notation, and which notation should be used for a given number.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/24556 provides some pointers
into various rabbit holes for those interested.
This gist seems to be that currently a different formatting is not
exposed in rust directly, at least not for public consumption.
There is the
[lexical-core](https://github.com/Alexhuszagh/rust-lexical) crate
though, which provides a way to format floats with various strategies
and formats.
Change our implementation of `TotalDisplay` for the `Value::Float` case
to use that. We still need to do some post-processing, because Nix
always adds the sign in scientific notation (and there's no way to
configure lexical-core to do that), and lexical-core in some cases keeps
the trailing zeros.
Even with all that in place, there as a difference in `eval-okay-
fromjson.nix` (from tvix-tests), which I couldn't get to work. I updated
the fixture to a less problematic number.
With this, the testsuite passes again, and does for the upcoming CL
introducing builtins.fromTOML, and enabling the nix testsuite bits for
it, too.
Change-Id: Ie6fba5619e1d9fd7ce669a51594658b029057acc
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7922
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
call_value in the VM expects the callable to be forced when calling
it, which was not the case for functors.
Change-Id: Id55a2fe32a9573be42aef8669e268df519a989cd
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7909
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
This is a somewhat terrifying hack that enables us to support
`builtins.builtins`, by running a "fake compilation" inside of a
suspended native thunk that can resolve the weak pointer to the
globals.
With this implementation, the thunk at `builtins.builtins` actually
resolves to the "real" `builtins` (verified with a new test).
This is kind of ugly, and it's something users shouldn't use, but
bubbling a warning out of this is difficult at the moment due to a
little bit of trickery with how the spans in suspended native thunks
work (they don't) (see b/237, b/238)
Change-Id: I67d0e93246dd5b279c960aeda00402031aa12af3
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7748
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
|
|
Implements `Serialize` for `tvix_eval::Value`. Special care is taken
with serialisation of attribute sets, and forcing of thunks.
The tests should cover both cases well.
Change-Id: I9bb135bacf6f87bc6bd0bd88cef0a42308e6c335
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7803
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Co-Authored-By: Vincent Ambo <tazjin@tvl.su>
Change-Id: Ib6f7d1f4f4faac36b44f5f75cccc57bf912cf606
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7626
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This optimiser can rewrite some expressions into more efficient forms,
and warn users about those cases.
As a proof-of-concept, only some simple boolean comparisons are
supported for now.
Change-Id: I7df561118cfbad281fc99523e859bc66e7a1adcb
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7766
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
|
|
This will eventually force us to have a base builtins set in common with
C++ Nix, i.e. all 2.3 builtins except the controversial
builtins.valueSize.
Change-Id: I2c767f07d6a14711911658e87da9f18ede57a143
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7747
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
With this is_valid_nix_identifier should line up with the upstream lexer
definition:
ID [a-zA-Z\_][a-zA-Z0-9\_\'\-]*
While we're working on this, add a simple test checking the various
formatting rules. Interestingly, it would not be suitable as an identity
test, since you have to write
{ "assert" = null; }
in order to avoid an evaluation error, but C++ Nix is happy to print
this as
{ assert = null; }
– maybe should be considered to be a bug.
Change-Id: I0a4e1ccb5033a80f3767fb8d1c4bba08d303c5d8
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7744
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
This uses the `im::OrdMap` for `NixAttrs` to enable sharing of memory
between different iterations of a map.
This slightly speeds up eval, but not significantly. Future work might
include benchmarking whether using a `HashMap` and only ordering in
cases where order is actually required would help.
This switches to a fork of `im` that fixes some bugs with its OrdMap
implementation.
Change-Id: I2f6a5ff471b6d508c1e8a98b13f889f49c0d9537
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7676
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Introduces granular dependency builds using crate2nix, bootstrapped
off the generated configuration from the newly introduced
workspace (see cl/7533).
This commit checks in the generated Cargo.nix file which can be
regenerated with a parameterless invocation of `crate2nix generate` in
`//tvix`. I tried generating this in IFD, but it turned out to be
harder than what seemed worthwhile for now.
In this setup, the various build targets for Rust projects end up
being attributes of the imported `Cargo.nix` file at the `tvix.crates`
attribute. These still lack configuration, however, which has been
fixed in the various `default.nix` files of individual projects.
Note that we (temporarily) lose the ability to build tvix-eval's
benchmarks in CI. I haven't figured out what magic incantation summons
them from the void again ...
The `eval-okay-readDir` tests from both test suites have been disabled
because they fail for unknown reasons when run in this new derivation.
Somebody will have to debug it!
Change-Id: I2014614ccb9c8951aedbd71df7966ca191a13695
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7538
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Maybe counter-intuitively the inner elements of a list or the
attribute values of an attribute set will be forced despite
pointer equality (but only one layer deep).
Change-Id: I485d96452fb56f5fb342d39039c9137725b33d3f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7371
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This came up in the Nix Language channel today and I thought it
warranted a test case.
We did actually implement this correctly.
Change-Id: I4b37c92d06eb6e3a7f59ea3d10af38f2b0a93d53
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7493
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I9baf2810fbd5b6ee8bfe10fce5b64801a35c1d67
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7369
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I617d402c8ecc7aaf607c4bdcd58a06ebddb71fac
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7370
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
Tests included.
Change-Id: I7a4905d6103813373e383e2e8629c5fd243d6bca
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7377
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
This test case checks two things:
* A sanity check that "pointer equality for functions" means not
just the lambda, but also the upvalues.
* To be pointer-equal, it is not enough for the upvalues to be
normal-form equal (i.e. `nix_eq()`-equal); the upvalues must be
*pointer*-equal. The second part of the test case checks for
this.
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I4e59327a6f199b8212e97197b212e3c3934bb3f0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7372
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I6dfc9108220762ef3372cd2739e91d79c01a55e1
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7366
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
We have to be careful implementing `builtins.groupBy`, since the
list may contain thunks, and tvix's to_xxx() functions do not work
on thunks.
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I182b6fc2d4296f864ed16744ef70b153e8e6978a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7039
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
The impl Display for NixAttrs needs to wrap double quotes around any
keys which are not valid Nix identifiers. This commit does that,
and adds a test (which fails prior to this commit and passes after
this commit).
Change-Id: Ie31ce91e8637cb27073f23f115db81feefdc6424
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7084
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
The current implementation of nix_eq will force one level of thunks
and then switch to the (non-forcing) rust Eq::eq() method. This
gives incorrect results for lists-of-thunks.
This commit changes nix_eq() to be recursive.
A regression test (which fails prior to this commit) is included.
This fix also causes nix_tests/eval-okay-fromjson.nix to pass, so it
is moved out of notyetpassing.
Change-Id: I655fd7a5294208a7b39df8e2c3c12a8b9768292f
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7142
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Change-Id: I59a0756940d1e5360a2ab4e886cf0bc9af7b8901
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7133
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Lists are compared lexicographically in C++ nix as of [0], and our
updated nix test suites depend on this. This implements comparison of
list values in `Value::nix_cmp` using a very similar algorithm to what
C++ does - similarly to there, this requires passing in the VM so we can
force thunks in the list elements as we go.
[0]: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/commit/09471d2680292af48b2788108de56a8da755d661#
Change-Id: I5d8bb07f90647a1fec83f775243e21af856afbb1
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7070
Autosubmit: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I93dcdaeb101364ee2273bcaeb19acb57cf6b9e7d
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7034
Autosubmit: j4m3s <james.landrein@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I4e6c4f96f6f5097a5c637eb3dbbd7bb8b34b7d52
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7032
Autosubmit: j4m3s <james.landrein@gmail.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
|
|
Change-Id: I3898284bc4871e5483ead0c27e0f2832d66f2b29
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7061
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
|
|
Note that this test (ironically) fails if the observer is used (e.g.
with --trace-runtime), but that's a separate issue.
Change-Id: I952eaeac8b5a7acce9c66cd4744ec570280748e7
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7055
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This is done via a new `deepForce` function on Value. Since values can
be cyclical (for example, see the test-case), we need to do some extra
work to avoid RefCell borrow errors if we ever hit a graph cycle:
While deep-forcing values, we keep a set of thunks that we have
already seen and avoid doing any work on the same thunk twice. The set
is encapsulated in a separate type to stop potentially invalid
pointers from leaking out.
Finally, since deep_force is conceptually similar to
`VM::force_for_output` (but more suited to usage in eval since it
doesn't clone the values) this removes the latter, replacing it with
the former.
Co-Authored-By: Vincent Ambo <tazjin@tvl.su>
Change-Id: Iefddefcf09fae3b6a4d161a5873febcff54b9157
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7000
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
When forcing thunks in `force_with_output`, the call stack of the VM
is actually empty (as the calls are synthetic and no longer part of
the evaluation of the top-level expression).
This means that Tvix crashed when constructing error spans for the
`fallible` macro, as the assumption of there being an enclosing span
was violated.
To work around this, we instead pass the span for the whole top-level
expression to force_for_output and set this as the span for the
enclosing error chain. Existing output logic will already avoid
printing the entire expression as an error span.
This fixes b/213.
Change-Id: I93978e0deaf5bcb0f47a6fa95b3f5bebef5bad4c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7052
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
|
|
Without this change it was possible to cause situations (see the new
test) in which a `with`-namespace was forced prematurely.
Change-Id: I879ea7763b43edc693feace2c73c890d426fafd3
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7031
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
Now that we're tracking formals on Lambda this ends up being quite easy;
we just pull them off of the Lambda for the argument closure and use
them to construct the result attribute set.
Change-Id: I811cb61ec34c6bef123a4043000b18c0e4ea0125
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7003
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Validate "closed formals" (formal parameters without an ellipsis) via a
new ValidateClosedFormals op, which checks the arguments (in an attr set
at the top of the stack) against the formal parameters on the Lambda in
the current frame, and returns a new UnexpectedArgument error (including
the span of the formals themselves!!) if any arguments aren't allowed
Change-Id: Idcc47a59167a83be1832a6229f137d84e426c56c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7002
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Since we already have infra for forcing arguments to builtins, this ends
up being almost *too* simple - we just return the second argument!
Change-Id: I070d3d0b551c4dcdac095f67b31e22e0de90cbd7
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6999
Reviewed-by: kanepyork <rikingcoding@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I8b591f3057c68c1542046fc5a771973f2238c9df
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7020
Autosubmit: j4m3s <james.landrein@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
