Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Formals can be initialised with deferred default values (see the test
cases), in which case they need an extra thunk to have something that
can be finalised appropriately when the setup is done.
Fixes: b/255
Change-Id: I380e3770be68eaa83ace96d450c7cead32dacc9f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8196
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
|
|
Change-Id: Ief20544a44c3542fe40a5c09f81d0f064a346f44
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8149
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
|
|
Formals can depend on each other when using another formal as a
default value.
This test ensures that the compiler's declaration and initialisation
order of formals is consistent with what actually happens in the VM.
Change-Id: Ibdabe262554e8066d67fac1ebc3b5a48ef626e18
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7948
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
|
|
Apparently our naive implementation of float formatting, which simply
used {:.5}, and trimmed trailing "0" strings not sufficient.
It wrongly trimmed numbers with zeroes but no decimal point, like
`10000` got trimmed to `1`.
Nix uses `std::to_string` on the double, which according to
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/string/basic_string/to_string
is equivalent to `std::sprintf(buf, "%f", value)`.
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/io/c/fprintf mentions this is treated
like this:
> Precision specifies the exact number of digits to appear after
> the decimal point character. The default precision is 6. In the
> alternative implementation decimal point character is written even if
> no digits follow it. For infinity and not-a-number conversion style
> see notes.
This doesn't seem to be the case though, and Nix uses scientific
notation in some cases.
There's a whole bunch of strategies to determine which is a more compact
notation, and which notation should be used for a given number.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/24556 provides some pointers
into various rabbit holes for those interested.
This gist seems to be that currently a different formatting is not
exposed in rust directly, at least not for public consumption.
There is the
[lexical-core](https://github.com/Alexhuszagh/rust-lexical) crate
though, which provides a way to format floats with various strategies
and formats.
Change our implementation of `TotalDisplay` for the `Value::Float` case
to use that. We still need to do some post-processing, because Nix
always adds the sign in scientific notation (and there's no way to
configure lexical-core to do that), and lexical-core in some cases keeps
the trailing zeros.
Even with all that in place, there as a difference in `eval-okay-
fromjson.nix` (from tvix-tests), which I couldn't get to work. I updated
the fixture to a less problematic number.
With this, the testsuite passes again, and does for the upcoming CL
introducing builtins.fromTOML, and enabling the nix testsuite bits for
it, too.
Change-Id: Ie6fba5619e1d9fd7ce669a51594658b029057acc
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7922
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
call_value in the VM expects the callable to be forced when calling
it, which was not the case for functors.
Change-Id: Id55a2fe32a9573be42aef8669e268df519a989cd
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7909
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
This is a somewhat terrifying hack that enables us to support
`builtins.builtins`, by running a "fake compilation" inside of a
suspended native thunk that can resolve the weak pointer to the
globals.
With this implementation, the thunk at `builtins.builtins` actually
resolves to the "real" `builtins` (verified with a new test).
This is kind of ugly, and it's something users shouldn't use, but
bubbling a warning out of this is difficult at the moment due to a
little bit of trickery with how the spans in suspended native thunks
work (they don't) (see b/237, b/238)
Change-Id: I67d0e93246dd5b279c960aeda00402031aa12af3
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7748
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
|
|
Implements `Serialize` for `tvix_eval::Value`. Special care is taken
with serialisation of attribute sets, and forcing of thunks.
The tests should cover both cases well.
Change-Id: I9bb135bacf6f87bc6bd0bd88cef0a42308e6c335
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7803
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Co-Authored-By: Vincent Ambo <tazjin@tvl.su>
Change-Id: Ib6f7d1f4f4faac36b44f5f75cccc57bf912cf606
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7626
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This optimiser can rewrite some expressions into more efficient forms,
and warn users about those cases.
As a proof-of-concept, only some simple boolean comparisons are
supported for now.
Change-Id: I7df561118cfbad281fc99523e859bc66e7a1adcb
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7766
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
|
|
This will eventually force us to have a base builtins set in common with
C++ Nix, i.e. all 2.3 builtins except the controversial
builtins.valueSize.
Change-Id: I2c767f07d6a14711911658e87da9f18ede57a143
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7747
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
With this is_valid_nix_identifier should line up with the upstream lexer
definition:
ID [a-zA-Z\_][a-zA-Z0-9\_\'\-]*
While we're working on this, add a simple test checking the various
formatting rules. Interestingly, it would not be suitable as an identity
test, since you have to write
{ "assert" = null; }
in order to avoid an evaluation error, but C++ Nix is happy to print
this as
{ assert = null; }
– maybe should be considered to be a bug.
Change-Id: I0a4e1ccb5033a80f3767fb8d1c4bba08d303c5d8
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7744
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
This uses the `im::OrdMap` for `NixAttrs` to enable sharing of memory
between different iterations of a map.
This slightly speeds up eval, but not significantly. Future work might
include benchmarking whether using a `HashMap` and only ordering in
cases where order is actually required would help.
This switches to a fork of `im` that fixes some bugs with its OrdMap
implementation.
Change-Id: I2f6a5ff471b6d508c1e8a98b13f889f49c0d9537
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7676
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Introduces granular dependency builds using crate2nix, bootstrapped
off the generated configuration from the newly introduced
workspace (see cl/7533).
This commit checks in the generated Cargo.nix file which can be
regenerated with a parameterless invocation of `crate2nix generate` in
`//tvix`. I tried generating this in IFD, but it turned out to be
harder than what seemed worthwhile for now.
In this setup, the various build targets for Rust projects end up
being attributes of the imported `Cargo.nix` file at the `tvix.crates`
attribute. These still lack configuration, however, which has been
fixed in the various `default.nix` files of individual projects.
Note that we (temporarily) lose the ability to build tvix-eval's
benchmarks in CI. I haven't figured out what magic incantation summons
them from the void again ...
The `eval-okay-readDir` tests from both test suites have been disabled
because they fail for unknown reasons when run in this new derivation.
Somebody will have to debug it!
Change-Id: I2014614ccb9c8951aedbd71df7966ca191a13695
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7538
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Maybe counter-intuitively the inner elements of a list or the
attribute values of an attribute set will be forced despite
pointer equality (but only one layer deep).
Change-Id: I485d96452fb56f5fb342d39039c9137725b33d3f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7371
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This came up in the Nix Language channel today and I thought it
warranted a test case.
We did actually implement this correctly.
Change-Id: I4b37c92d06eb6e3a7f59ea3d10af38f2b0a93d53
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7493
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I9baf2810fbd5b6ee8bfe10fce5b64801a35c1d67
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7369
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I617d402c8ecc7aaf607c4bdcd58a06ebddb71fac
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7370
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
Tests included.
Change-Id: I7a4905d6103813373e383e2e8629c5fd243d6bca
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7377
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
This test case checks two things:
* A sanity check that "pointer equality for functions" means not
just the lambda, but also the upvalues.
* To be pointer-equal, it is not enough for the upvalues to be
normal-form equal (i.e. `nix_eq()`-equal); the upvalues must be
*pointer*-equal. The second part of the test case checks for
this.
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I4e59327a6f199b8212e97197b212e3c3934bb3f0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7372
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I6dfc9108220762ef3372cd2739e91d79c01a55e1
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7366
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
We have to be careful implementing `builtins.groupBy`, since the
list may contain thunks, and tvix's to_xxx() functions do not work
on thunks.
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I182b6fc2d4296f864ed16744ef70b153e8e6978a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7039
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
The impl Display for NixAttrs needs to wrap double quotes around any
keys which are not valid Nix identifiers. This commit does that,
and adds a test (which fails prior to this commit and passes after
this commit).
Change-Id: Ie31ce91e8637cb27073f23f115db81feefdc6424
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7084
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
The current implementation of nix_eq will force one level of thunks
and then switch to the (non-forcing) rust Eq::eq() method. This
gives incorrect results for lists-of-thunks.
This commit changes nix_eq() to be recursive.
A regression test (which fails prior to this commit) is included.
This fix also causes nix_tests/eval-okay-fromjson.nix to pass, so it
is moved out of notyetpassing.
Change-Id: I655fd7a5294208a7b39df8e2c3c12a8b9768292f
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7142
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Change-Id: I59a0756940d1e5360a2ab4e886cf0bc9af7b8901
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7133
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Lists are compared lexicographically in C++ nix as of [0], and our
updated nix test suites depend on this. This implements comparison of
list values in `Value::nix_cmp` using a very similar algorithm to what
C++ does - similarly to there, this requires passing in the VM so we can
force thunks in the list elements as we go.
[0]: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/commit/09471d2680292af48b2788108de56a8da755d661#
Change-Id: I5d8bb07f90647a1fec83f775243e21af856afbb1
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7070
Autosubmit: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I93dcdaeb101364ee2273bcaeb19acb57cf6b9e7d
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7034
Autosubmit: j4m3s <james.landrein@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I4e6c4f96f6f5097a5c637eb3dbbd7bb8b34b7d52
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7032
Autosubmit: j4m3s <james.landrein@gmail.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
|
|
Change-Id: I3898284bc4871e5483ead0c27e0f2832d66f2b29
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7061
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
|
|
Note that this test (ironically) fails if the observer is used (e.g.
with --trace-runtime), but that's a separate issue.
Change-Id: I952eaeac8b5a7acce9c66cd4744ec570280748e7
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7055
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This is done via a new `deepForce` function on Value. Since values can
be cyclical (for example, see the test-case), we need to do some extra
work to avoid RefCell borrow errors if we ever hit a graph cycle:
While deep-forcing values, we keep a set of thunks that we have
already seen and avoid doing any work on the same thunk twice. The set
is encapsulated in a separate type to stop potentially invalid
pointers from leaking out.
Finally, since deep_force is conceptually similar to
`VM::force_for_output` (but more suited to usage in eval since it
doesn't clone the values) this removes the latter, replacing it with
the former.
Co-Authored-By: Vincent Ambo <tazjin@tvl.su>
Change-Id: Iefddefcf09fae3b6a4d161a5873febcff54b9157
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7000
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
When forcing thunks in `force_with_output`, the call stack of the VM
is actually empty (as the calls are synthetic and no longer part of
the evaluation of the top-level expression).
This means that Tvix crashed when constructing error spans for the
`fallible` macro, as the assumption of there being an enclosing span
was violated.
To work around this, we instead pass the span for the whole top-level
expression to force_for_output and set this as the span for the
enclosing error chain. Existing output logic will already avoid
printing the entire expression as an error span.
This fixes b/213.
Change-Id: I93978e0deaf5bcb0f47a6fa95b3f5bebef5bad4c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7052
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
|
|
Without this change it was possible to cause situations (see the new
test) in which a `with`-namespace was forced prematurely.
Change-Id: I879ea7763b43edc693feace2c73c890d426fafd3
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7031
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
Now that we're tracking formals on Lambda this ends up being quite easy;
we just pull them off of the Lambda for the argument closure and use
them to construct the result attribute set.
Change-Id: I811cb61ec34c6bef123a4043000b18c0e4ea0125
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7003
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Validate "closed formals" (formal parameters without an ellipsis) via a
new ValidateClosedFormals op, which checks the arguments (in an attr set
at the top of the stack) against the formal parameters on the Lambda in
the current frame, and returns a new UnexpectedArgument error (including
the span of the formals themselves!!) if any arguments aren't allowed
Change-Id: Idcc47a59167a83be1832a6229f137d84e426c56c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7002
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Since we already have infra for forcing arguments to builtins, this ends
up being almost *too* simple - we just return the second argument!
Change-Id: I070d3d0b551c4dcdac095f67b31e22e0de90cbd7
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6999
Reviewed-by: kanepyork <rikingcoding@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I8b591f3057c68c1542046fc5a771973f2238c9df
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7020
Autosubmit: j4m3s <james.landrein@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I8aa878dee009901feb453c489ce37c12fa3a31a8
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7026
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: Iaba9bcfa19f283cd0c1931be2f211e2528a1a940
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6998
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: kanepyork <rikingcoding@gmail.com>
|
|
Implement an *initial* version of builtins.match, using the rust `regex`
crate for regular expressions. The rust regex crate definitely has
different semantics than nix's regular expressions - but we'd like to
see how far we can get before the incompatibility starts to matter.
This consciously leaves out any sort of memo for compiled regular
expressions (which upstream nix also has) for the sake of expediency -
in the future we should implement that so we don't have to compile the
same regular expression multiple times.
Change-Id: I5b718635831ec83397940e417a9047c4342b6fa1
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6989
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Using `serde_json` for parsing JSON here, plus an `impl FromJSON for
Value`. The latter is primarily to stay "dependency light" for now -
likely going with an actual serde `Deserialize` impl in the future is
going to be way better as it allows saving significantly on intermediary
allocations.
Change-Id: I152a0448ff7c87cf7ebaac927c38912b99de1c18
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6920
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Working on https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/7158, I discovered that C++
Nix actually is strict in the accumulator, just not in the first value.
This seems due to the fact that in the C++ evaluator, function calls
don't seem to be thunked unconditionally and foldl' just elects not to
wrap it in a thunk (don't quote me on this summary, even though it seems
to line up with the code for primop_foldlStrict and testable behavior).
It doesn't seem worth it to risk breaking the odd Nix expression just to
be strict in one more value per invocation of foldl' (i.e. the initial
accumulator value `nul`), so let's match the existing C++ Nix behavior
here.
Change-Id: If59e62271a90d97cb440f0ca72a58ec7840d1690
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7022
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
This commit causes the test eval-okay-builtins.nix to pass.
It also adds tests/tvix_tests/eval-okay-dirof.nix which has better
coverage than the nix tests for this builtin.
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I71d96b48680696fd6e4fea3a9861742b35cfaa66
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6987
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This commit implements builtins.baseNameOf and adds a test case
eval-okay-basenameof.nix to the test suite.
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: Ib8bbafba2ac9ca0e1d3dc5e844167f94890d9fee
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6997
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
|
|
builtins.parseDrvName should not coerce its argument to a string.
This commit fixes that oversight in my previous commit, and adds an
xfail test to cover this condition.
Thanks to @sterni for noticing this.
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I76bc78f1a82e1e08fe5c787c563a221d55de2639
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6991
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Change-Id: I59254a0ac513b3d2a6b2184554358bb6eba2ba99
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6949
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
When investigating discrepancies between foldl' in tvix and C++ Nix,
I discovered that C++ Nix's foldl' doesn't seem to be strict at all.
Since this seemed wrong, I looked into Haskell's foldl' implementation
which doesn't force the list elements (`val` in our code), but the
accumulation value (`res` in our code). You can look at the code here:
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-4.17.0.0/docs/src/GHC.List.html#foldl%27
This actually makes a lot of sense: If `res` is not forced after each
application of `op`, we'll end up thunks nested as deeply as the list is
long, potentially taking up a lot of space. This can be limited by
forcing the `res` thunk before applying `op` again (and creating a new
thunk).
I've also PR-ed an equivalent change for C++ Nix at
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/7158. Since this is not merged nor
backported to our Nix 2.3 fork, I've not copied the eval fail test yet,
since it wouldn't when checking our tests against C++ Nix in depot.
Change-Id: I34edf6fc3031fc1485c3e714f2280b4fba8f004b
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6947
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I28910991a0108436a42ac7bf3458f9180a44154e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6928
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Previously, the VM assumed that if an error was returned from `run()`,
the evaluation was "finished" and the state of the VM didn't matter.
This used to be a reasonable assumption, but now that we've got
`tryEval` around we need to actually make sure that we clean up after
ourselves if we're about to return an error. Specifically, if the *last*
instruction in an evaluation frame returns an error, we previously
wouldn't pop that evaluation frame, which could cause all sorts of
bizarre errors based on what happened to be in the stack at the time.
This commit splits out a `run_op` method from `VM::run`, and uses that
to check the evaluation frame return condition even if the op we're
running is about to return an error, and pop the evaluation frame if
we're at the last instruction.
Change-Id: Ib40649d8915ee1571153cb71e3d76492542fc3d7
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6940
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Change-Id: If3fd0b087009a2bfbad8bb7aca0aa20de906eb12
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6921
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: kanepyork <rikingcoding@gmail.com>
Autosubmit: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Despite this not being documented, `tryEval` is empirically able to
catch errors caused by a <...> path not resolving (and nixpkgs depends
on this).
Change-Id: Ia3b78a2d9d2d0c603aba829518b351102dc55396
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6926
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|