| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This commit rewrites Value::nix_cmp_ordering() into an equivalent
nonrecursive form. Except for calls to Thunk::force(), the new form
no longer uses generators, and is async only because of the fact
that it calls Thunk::force().
I originally believed that this commit would make evaluation faster.
In fact it is slightly slower. I believe this is due to the added
vec![] allocation. I am investigating.
Prev-Nixpkgs-Benchmark: {"attrpath":"pkgsCross.aarch64-multiplatform.hello.outPath","peak-kbytes":"460048","system-seconds":"0.68","user-seconds":"5.73"}
This-Nixpkgs-Benchmark: {"attrpath":"pkgsCross.aarch64-multiplatform.hello.outPath","peak-kbytes":"460224","system-seconds":"0.67","user-seconds":"5.84"}
Change-Id: Ic627bc220d9c5aa3c5e68b9b8bf199837cd55af5
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/10212
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
|
|
Not yet passing.
Change-Id: I1de3f72d8b3f46567fdba010fc3ab4bace3f1699
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/10219
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This explicitly documents behavior of C++ Nix that goes against the
intuition you'd gather from this document: that e.g. a simple select
from an attribute set causes a value to no longer be pointer equal to
its former self.
The point of documenting this is that we can show in a to be written
section on the use of pointer equality in nixpkgs that pointer equality
is only needed in a limited sense for evaluating it (C++ Nix's exterior
pointer equality). Tvix's pointer equality is far more powerful since
value identity preserving operations also preserve pointer equality,
generally speaking (this is because we implement interior pointer
equality in my made up terminology). This should eventually also be
documented.
Change-Id: I6ce7ef2d67b012f5ebc92f9e81bba33fb9dce7d0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8856
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
genericClosure has very limited support for pointer equality: It relies
on comparison (not equality!) in C++ Nix, so as soon as C++ Nix supports
comparing lists (langVersion >= 6) we can rely on pointer equality for
key.
Since Tvix uses equality, not comparison for the insert, our behavior is
currently different, as documented by the notyetpassing tests.
Change-Id: Ifcd741ed4fc3ccc3825f7038875d56a9918b786a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8720
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
In order for the test suite we have currently to be comparable to C++
Nix, we need to display values in the same way. This was largely the
case except in some weird cases.
* <CODE> for thunks and <CYCLE> for repeated thunks (?) are already in
use. <CODE> formatting is tested by the oracle test suite already.
* Instead of lambda, we need to use <LAMBDA>
* <<primop>> and <<primop-app>> (a formatting C++ Nix uses nowhere)
now are <PRIMOP> and <PRIMOP-APP>.
We'll probably want to have a fancier display of values (in a separate
trait) down the line. This could be used for interactive usage, e.g. the
REPL or a potential debugger.
There is a peculiarity with C++ Nix 2.3 formatting primops: import is
considered a <<PRIMOP-APP>>, since it is internally implemented by means
of scopedImport. This implementation detail no longer leaks in C++ Nix
2.13 nor in Tvix.
<CYCLE> display is untested at the moment, since we exhibit a
discrepancy to C++ Nix 2.3. Our current detection is more similar to C++
Nix 2.13—luckily it is also the more consistent of the two. See also
b/245.
Change-Id: I1d534434b02e470bf5475b3758920ea81e3420dc
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8760
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Unsupported by Tvix at the moment. Documents b/280.
Change-Id: I48844feeefa9da8ed7e5d85300d52bb5650f82d2
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8772
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
This will eventually force us to have a base builtins set in common with
C++ Nix, i.e. all 2.3 builtins except the controversial
builtins.valueSize.
Change-Id: I2c767f07d6a14711911658e87da9f18ede57a143
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7747
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
