| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
genericClosure has very limited support for pointer equality: It relies
on comparison (not equality!) in C++ Nix, so as soon as C++ Nix supports
comparing lists (langVersion >= 6) we can rely on pointer equality for
key.
Since Tvix uses equality, not comparison for the insert, our behavior is
currently different, as documented by the notyetpassing tests.
Change-Id: Ifcd741ed4fc3ccc3825f7038875d56a9918b786a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8720
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
In order for the test suite we have currently to be comparable to C++
Nix, we need to display values in the same way. This was largely the
case except in some weird cases.
* <CODE> for thunks and <CYCLE> for repeated thunks (?) are already in
use. <CODE> formatting is tested by the oracle test suite already.
* Instead of lambda, we need to use <LAMBDA>
* <<primop>> and <<primop-app>> (a formatting C++ Nix uses nowhere)
now are <PRIMOP> and <PRIMOP-APP>.
We'll probably want to have a fancier display of values (in a separate
trait) down the line. This could be used for interactive usage, e.g. the
REPL or a potential debugger.
There is a peculiarity with C++ Nix 2.3 formatting primops: import is
considered a <<PRIMOP-APP>>, since it is internally implemented by means
of scopedImport. This implementation detail no longer leaks in C++ Nix
2.13 nor in Tvix.
<CYCLE> display is untested at the moment, since we exhibit a
discrepancy to C++ Nix 2.3. Our current detection is more similar to C++
Nix 2.13—luckily it is also the more consistent of the two. See also
b/245.
Change-Id: I1d534434b02e470bf5475b3758920ea81e3420dc
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8760
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Unsupported by Tvix at the moment. Documents b/280.
Change-Id: I48844feeefa9da8ed7e5d85300d52bb5650f82d2
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8772
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
This will eventually force us to have a base builtins set in common with
C++ Nix, i.e. all 2.3 builtins except the controversial
builtins.valueSize.
Change-Id: I2c767f07d6a14711911658e87da9f18ede57a143
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7747
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
