Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
grfn suggested clearer naming for these in cl/6166.
Change-Id: I83164bf1d1902ebd42272e9d5d63819a0f6a72c5
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6277
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: Ifdd7b99223d239d955ac7eeeae95db97eb742bf0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6276
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I758fc4f3b9078de7ca6228a75a4351c3e085c4cf
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6272
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This is a more sensible place for this function to live and makes
upvalue resolution easier down the line.
Change-Id: I48ee39bdcdb4f96a16a327f7015aff60db5b15fb
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6270
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
This struct will carry the upvalue machinery in addition to the lambda
itself. For now, all lambdas are wrapped in closures (though
technically analysis of the environment can later remove innermost
Closure wrapper, but this optimisation may not be worth it).
Change-Id: If2b68549ec1ea4ab838fdc47a2181c694ac937f2
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6269
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Change-Id: I76157f9cf1369cd17506de1b1ded1a4fd06f004a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6268
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|