Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Implicit constructors can be confusing, especially in a codebase that
is already as unintentionally obfuscated as this one.
https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Explicit_Constructors
|
|
This last change set was generated by a full clang-tidy run (including
compilation):
clang-tidy -p ~/projects/nix-build/ \
-checks=-*,readability-braces-around-statements -fix src/*/*.cc
Actually running clang-tidy requires some massaging to make it play
nice with Nix + meson, I'll be adding a wrapper or something for that soon.
|
|
These were not caught by the previous clang-tidy invocation, but were
instead sorted out using amber[0] as such:
ambr --regex 'for (\(.+\))\s([a-z].*;)' 'for $1 { $2 }'
[0]: https://github.com/dalance/amber
|
|
These were not caught by the previous clang-tidy invocation, but were
instead sorted out using amber[0] as such:
ambr --regex 'if (\(.+\))\s([a-z].*;)' 'if $1 { $2 }'
[0]: https://github.com/dalance/amber
|
|
This change was generated with:
fd -e cc -e hh | xargs -I{} clang-tidy {} -p ~/projects/nix-build/ \
--checks='-*,readability-braces-around-statements' --fix \
-fix-errors
Some manual fixes were applied because some convoluted unbraced
statements couldn't be untangled by clang-tidy.
This commit still includes invalid files, but I decided to clean them
up in a subsequent commit so that it becomes more obvious where
clang-tidy failed. Maybe this will allow for a bug-report to
clang-tidy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reformatted with:
fd . -e hh -e cc | xargs clang-format -i
|
|
git-subtree-dir: third_party/nix
git-subtree-mainline: cf8cd640c1adf74a3706efbcb0ea4625da106fb2
git-subtree-split: be66c7a6b24e3c3c6157fd37b86c7203d14acf10
|