Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
HasAttrs was weird because with longer attribute paths it would
sometimes not turn out to be a thunk. If it was a thunk, it'd usually
still do some eval strictly which we'll want to avoid.
Verified against C++ Nix using a new test suite introduced in a later
CL.
Change-Id: I6d047ccc68d046bb268462f170a3c4f3c5ddeffe
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8656
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
Probably no real world code broken by this overzealous evaluation, but
let's be thorough!
Change-Id: Ib405a677182eab7940ace940c68e107573473a54
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8655
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Unary operator applications are thunked which can easily be observed by
nix-instantiate --eval -E '[ (!true) (-1) ]'
Unfortunately, there are few simple expressions where this makes a
difference in the end result. Thus it only cropped up when using nixpkgs
for cross compilation: Here we would compile the expression
!(stdenv.cc.isGNU or false)
to assemble python3Minimal's passthru attribute set (at least this seems
to be the most likely explanation from the backtraces I've studied).
This means that an unthunked
<stdenv.cc.isGNU or false>
OpForce
OpInvert
would be performed in order to assemble this attribute set, causing
stdenv.cc to be evaluated too early, causing an infinite recursion.
Resolves b/273.
It seems that having a test suite that doesn't use --strict and relies
on thunks rendered as <CODE> would be beneficial for catching such
issues. I've not been able to find a test case with --strict that
demonstrates the problem fixed in this CL.
Change-Id: I640a5827b963f5b9d0f86fa2142e75e3a6bbee78
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8654
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
This will prevent tvix from printing any warnings.
As a followup, we can also thread this parameter through into the
evaluator itself, to prevent warnings from being constructed in first
place.
Change-Id: I15381396f86573484bdd1a73d09034a665638e35
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8646
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|