about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/third_party/default.nix (unfollow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-06-30 r/1133 refactor(nix): use our own writeScript(Bin)Profpatsch1-2/+0
We have this nice `runExecline` now, so we don’t need to use `runCommand` (which spawns bash) just to write a simple script. Change-Id: I2941ed8c1448fa1d7cc02dc18b24a8a945b2c38b Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/704 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: tazjin <mail@tazj.in> Reviewed-by: BuildkiteCI
2020-06-29 r/1132 feat(nix/runExecline): add runExeclineProfpatsch5-1/+254
runExecline is a primitive that just does not care. It’s similar to `runCommand`, but instead of concatenating bash scripts left and right, it actually *uses* the features of `derivation`, passing things to `args` and making it possible to overwrite the `builder` in a sensible manner. Additionally, it provides a way to pass a nix string to `stdin` of the build script. Similar to `writeExecline`, the passed script is not a string, but a nested list of nix lists representing execline blocks. Escaping is done by the implementation, the user can just use normal nix strings. Change-Id: I890d9e5d921207751cdc8cc4309381395d92742f Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/701 Reviewed-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: isomer <isomer@tvl.fyi> Reviewed-by: tazjin <mail@tazj.in> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
2020-06-29 r/1131 refactor(nix/escapeExecline): move into own directoryProfpatsch3-30/+34
The escaping functions are going to be used by both `writeExecline` and `runExecline`, so let’s move them to their own namespace. Change-Id: Iccf69eaeca3062573e0751a17c548b7def86196d Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/706 Reviewed-by: tazjin <mail@tazj.in> Reviewed-by: Kane York <rikingcoding@gmail.com>
2020-06-29 r/1130 chore(ops): Clean up old GCP infrastructure filesVincent Ambo34-648/+0
This removes almost all of the GCP-infrastructure leftovers from my previous setup. The DNS configuration is retained, but moves to my user folder instead. Change-Id: I1867acd379443882f11a3c645846c9902eadd5b0 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/782 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: eta <eta@theta.eu.org> Reviewed-by: isomer <isomer@tvl.fyi>
2020-06-29 r/1129 feat(besadii): Temporarily add Code-Review labels on CLsVincent Ambo1-0/+7
Besadii already adds 'Verified'-labels, which are used to signal CI status on CLs, however we don't actually use these labels (yet) which also means that they are not displayed in the Gerrit UI. This change temporarily introduces the Code-Review label *in addition* (with the sam