| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This adds support for Clozure's CL implementation to buildLisp. This is
quite trivial in comparison to ECL since SBCL and CCL have very similar
in how they work (so much so that CCL also suffers from b/136).
Also the similarities in the code actually added here are striking, so
I'll try to make an effort to reduce the code duplication in the
future.
To fix builds with CCL the following changes were made:
* //3p/lisp/nibbles: The double inclusion of the types.lisp file was
fixed. CCL doesn't like double definitions and refuses to compile
otherwise.
* //3p/lisp/physical-quantities: Update to a new bug fix release which
contains a compilation fix for CCL.
* //3p/lisp/routes: apply a patch fixing the build which was previously
failing due to a double definition.
* //3p/lisp/usocket: only depend on sb-bsd-sockets for SBCL and ECL, the
latter of which seems to have a SBCL compatible implementation of the
package.
* Conditionally include a few CCL-specific source files and add
`badImplementation` entries for the remaining failures which are
//fun/gemma (to be expected) and //web/panettone which fails with an
incredibly vague message.
Change-Id: I666efdc39a0f16ee1bb6e23225784c709b04e740
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/3350
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <mail@tazj.in>
|
|
Adds ECL as a second supported implementation, specifically a statically
linked ECL. This is interesting because we can create statically linked
binaries, but has a few drawbacks which doesn't make it generally
useful:
* Loading things is very slow: The statically linked ECL only has byte
compilation available, so when we do load things or use the REPL it is
significantly worse than with e. g. SBCL.
* We can't load shared objects via the FFI since ECL's dffi is not
available when linked statically. This means that as it stands, we
can't build a statically linked //web/panettone for example.
Since ECL is quite slow anyways, I think these drawbacks are worth it
since the biggest reason for using ECL would be to get a statically
linked binary. If we change our minds, it shouldn't be too hard to
provide ecl-static and ecl-dynamic as separate implementations.
ECL is LGPL and some libraries it uses as part of its runtime are as
well. I've outlined in the ecl-static overlay why this should be of no
concern in the context of depot even though we are statically linking.
Currently everything is building except projects that are using cffi to
load shared libaries which have gotten an appropriate
`badImplementations` entry. To get the rest building the following
changes were made:
* Anywhere a dependency on UIOP is expressed as `bundled "uiop"` we now
use `bundled "asdf"` for all implementations except SBCL. From my
testing, SBCL seems to be the only implementation to support using
`(require 'uiop)` to only load the UIOP package. Where both a
dependency on ASDF and UIOP exists, we just delete the UIOP one.
`(require 'asdf)` always causes UIOP to be available.
* Where appropriate only conditionally compile SBCL-specific code and
if any build the corresponding files for ECL.
* //lisp/klatre: Use the standard condition parse-error for all
implementations except SBCL in try-parse-integer.
* //3p/lisp/ironclad: disable SBCL assembly optimization hack for all
other platforms as it may interfere with compilation.
* //3p/lisp/trivial-mimes: prevent call to asdf function by substituting
it out of the source since it always errors out in ECL and we hardcode
the correct path elsewhere anyways.
As it stands ECL still suffers from a very weird problem which happens
when compiling postmodern and moptilities:
https://gitlab.com/embeddable-common-lisp/ecl/-/issues/651
Change-Id: I0285924f92ac154126b4c42145073c3fb33702ed
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/3297
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <mail@tazj.in>
Reviewed-by: eta <tvl@eta.st>
|
|
In preparation for the solution of b/108, we need to consistently use
`depot.third_party` for packages that are only packed in the TVL depot
and `pkgs` for things that come from nixpkgs.
This commit cleans up a huge chunk of these uses in //fun
Change-Id: I45a7b392a9749fa7859ff5100dcea415bda807c3
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/2914
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
Backports an old version of the Elm language (before the release where
they made everyone rewrite their programs), from the same old nixpkgs
commit as was previously used in overrides (see CL/2646).
Change-Id: I0ae4cc611aa40269b290651ab982c1db93518d8a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/2649
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
This mechanism wasn't actually used for anything other than a minor
external compatibility thing for buildGo.nix, which can also be solved
with a function parameter.
This breaks //fun/gemma because it means that the elmPackages used to
build it are no longer reachable from depot. We'll sort this out later.
Change-Id: I1bf2240435e869cdc4e99bdd1a138fdd2e76f96e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/2646
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This removes the ASDF system definition for Gemma and switches the
code over to buildLisp.
The program builds (including some terrifying hacks to get the
frontend to work), but there are some bizarre runtime issues that I
need to debug.
|
|
This moves the various projects from "type-based" folders (such as
"services" or "tools") into more appropriate semantic folders (such as
"nix", "ops" or "web").
Deprecated projects (nixcon-demo & gotest) which only existed for
testing/demonstration purposes have been removed.
(Note: *all* builds are broken with this commit)
|
