about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/tvix/docs/src/store
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'tvix/docs/src/store')
-rw-r--r--tvix/docs/src/store/api.md288
1 files changed, 288 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tvix/docs/src/store/api.md b/tvix/docs/src/store/api.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c5a5c477aa17
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tvix/docs/src/store/api.md
@@ -0,0 +1,288 @@
+tvix-[ca]store API
+==============
+
+This document outlines the design of the API exposed by tvix-castore and tvix-
+store, as well as other implementations of this store protocol.
+
+This document is meant to be read side-by-side with
+[castore.md](../../castore/docs/data-model.md) which describes the data model
+in more detail.
+
+The store API has four main consumers:
+
+1. The evaluator (or more correctly, the CLI/coordinator, in the Tvix
+   case) communicates with the store to:
+
+   * Upload files and directories (e.g. from `builtins.path`, or `src = ./path`
+     Nix expressions).
+   * Read files from the store where necessary (e.g. when `nixpkgs` is
+     located in the store, or for IFD).
+
+2. The builder communicates with the store to:
+
+   * Upload files and directories after a build, to persist build artifacts in
+     the store.
+
+3. Tvix clients (such as users that have Tvix installed, or, depending
+   on perspective, builder environments) expect the store to
+   "materialise" on disk to provide a directory layout with store
+   paths.
+
+4. Stores may communicate with other stores, to substitute already built store
+   paths, i.e. a store acts as a binary cache for other stores.
+
+The store API attempts to reuse parts of its API between these three
+consumers by making similarities explicit in the protocol. This leads
+to a protocol that is slightly more complex than a simple "file
+upload/download"-system, but at significantly greater efficiency, both in terms
+of deduplication opportunities as well as granularity.
+
+## The Store model
+
+Contents inside a tvix-store can be grouped into three different message types:
+
+ * Blobs
+ * Directories
+ * PathInfo (see further down)
+
+(check `castore.md` for more detailed field descriptions)
+
+### Blobs
+A blob object contains the literal file contents of regular (or executable)
+files.
+
+### Directory
+A directory object describes the direct children of a directory.
+
+It contains:
+ - name of child (regular or executable) files, and their [blake3][blake3] hash.
+ - name of child symlinks, and their target (as string)
+ - name of child directories, and their [blake3][blake3] hash (forming a Merkle DAG)
+
+### Content-addressed Store Model
+For example, lets consider a directory layout like this, with some
+imaginary hashes of file contents:
+
+```
+.
+├── file-1.txt        hash: 5891b5b522d5df086d0ff0b110fb
+└── nested
+    └── file-2.txt    hash: abc6fd595fc079d3114d4b71a4d8
+```
+
+A hash for the *directory* `nested` can be created by creating the `Directory`
+object:
+
+```json
+{
+  "directories": [],
+  "files": [{
+    "name": "file-2.txt",
+    "digest": "abc6fd595fc079d3114d4b71a4d8",
+    "size": 123,
+  }],
+  "symlink": [],
+}
+```
+
+And then hashing a serialised form of that data structure. We use the blake3
+hash of the canonical protobuf representation. Let's assume the hash was
+`ff0029485729bcde993720749232`.
+
+To create the directory object one layer up, we now refer to our `nested`
+directory object in `directories`, and to `file-1.txt` in `files`:
+
+```json
+{
+  "directories": [{
+    "name": "nested",
+    "digest": "ff0029485729bcde993720749232",
+    "size": 1,
+  }],
+  "files": [{
+    "name": "file-1.txt",
+    "digest": "5891b5b522d5df086d0ff0b110fb",
+    "size": 124,
+  }]
+}
+```
+
+This Merkle DAG of Directory objects, and flat store of blobs can be used to
+describe any file/directory/symlink inside a store path. Due to its content-
+addressed nature, it'll automatically deduplicate (re-)used (sub)directories,
+and allow substitution from any (untrusted) source.
+
+The thing that's now only missing is the metadata to map/"mount" from the
+content-addressed world to a physical path.
+
+### PathInfo
+As most paths in the Nix store currently are input-addressed [^input-addressed],
+and the `tvix-castore` data model is also not intrinsically using NAR hashes,
+we need something mapping from an input-addressed "output path hash" (or a Nix-
+specific content-addressed path) to the contents in the `tvix-castore` world.
+
+That's what `PathInfo` provides. It embeds the root node (Directory, File or
+Symlink) at a given store path.
+
+The root nodes' `name` field is populated with the (base)name inside
+`/nix/store`, so `xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-pname-1.2.3`.
+
+The `PathInfo` message also stores references to other store paths, and some
+more NARInfo-specific metadata (signatures, narhash, narsize).
+
+
+## API overview
+
+There's three different services:
+
+### BlobService
+`BlobService` can be used to store and retrieve blobs of data, used to host
+regular file contents.
+
+It is content-addressed, using [blake3][blake3]
+as a hashing function.
+
+As blake3 is a tree hash, there's an opportunity to do
+[verified streaming][bao] of parts of the file,
+which doesn't need to trust any more information than the root hash itself.
+Future extensions of the `BlobService` protocol will enable this.
+
+### DirectoryService
+`DirectoryService` allows lookups (and uploads) of `Directory` messages, and
+whole reference graphs of them.
+
+
+### PathInfoService
+The PathInfo service provides lookups from a store path hash to a `PathInfo`
+message.
+
+## Example flows
+
+Below there are some common use cases of tvix-store, and how the different
+services are used.
+
+###  Upload files and directories
+This is needed for `builtins.path` or `src = ./path` in Nix expressions (A), as
+well as for uploading build artifacts to a store (B).
+
+The path specified needs to be (recursively, BFS-style) traversed.
+ * All file contents need to be hashed with blake3, and submitted to the
+   *BlobService* if not already present.
+   A reference to them needs to be added to the parent Directory object that's
+   constructed.
+ * All symlinks need to be added to the parent directory they reside in.
+ * Whenever a Directory has been fully traversed, it needs to be uploaded to
+   the *DirectoryService* and a reference to it needs to be added to the parent
+   Directory object.
+
+Most of the hashing / directory traversal/uploading can happen in parallel,
+as long as Directory objects only refer to Directory objects and Blobs that
+have already been uploaded.
+
+When reaching the root, a `PathInfo` object needs to be constructed.
+
+ * In the case of content-addressed paths (A), the name of the root node is
+   based on the NAR representation of the contents.
+   It might make sense to be able to offload the NAR calculation to the store,
+   which can cache it.
+ * In the case of build artifacts (B), the output path is input-addressed and
+   known upfront.
+
+Contrary to Nix, this has the advantage of not having to upload a lot of things
+to the store that didn't change.
+
+### Reading files from the store from the evaluator
+This is the case when `nixpkgs` is located in the store, or IFD in general.
+
+The store client asks the `PathInfoService` for the `PathInfo` of the output
+path in the request, and looks at the root node.
+
+If something other than the root of the store path is requested, like for
+example `maintainers/maintainer-list.nix`, the root_node Directory is inspected
+and potentially a chain of `Directory` objects requested from
+*DirectoryService*. [^n+1query].
+
+When the desired file is reached, the *BlobService* can be used to read the
+contents of this file, and return it back to the evaluator.
+
+FUTUREWORK: define how importing from symlinks should/does work.
+
+Contrary to Nix, this has the advantage of not having to copy all of the
+contents of a store path to the evaluating machine, but really only fetching
+the files the evaluator currently cares about.
+
+### Materializing store paths on disk
+This is useful for people running a Tvix-only system, or running builds on a
+"Tvix remote builder" in its own mount namespace.
+
+In a system with Nix installed, we can't simply manually "extract" things to
+`/nix/store`, as Nix assumes to own all writes to this location.
+In these use cases, we're probably better off exposing a tvix-store as a local
+binary cache (that's what `//tvix/nar-bridge-go` does).
+
+Assuming we are in an environment where we control `/nix/store` exclusively, a
+"realize to disk" would either "extract" things from the `tvix-store` to a
+filesystem, or expose a `FUSE`/`virtio-fs` filesystem.
+
+The latter is already implemented, and particularly interesting for (remote)
+build workloads, as build inputs can be realized on-demand, which saves copying
+around a lot of never- accessed files.
+
+In both cases, the API interactions are similar.
+ * The *PathInfoService* is asked for the `PathInfo` of the requested store path.
+ * If everything should be "extracted", the *DirectoryService* is asked for all
+   `Directory` objects in the closure, the file structure is created, all Blobs
+   are downloaded and placed in their corresponding location and all symlinks
+   are created accordingly.
+ * If this is a FUSE filesystem, we can decide to only request a subset,
+   similar to the "Reading files from the store from the evaluator" use case,
+   even though it might make sense to keep all Directory objects around.
+   (See the caveat in "Trust model" though!)
+
+### Stores communicating with other stores
+The gRPC API exposed by the tvix-store allows composing multiple stores, and
+implementing some caching strategies, that store clients don't need to be aware
+of.
+
+ * For example, a caching strategy could have a fast local tvix-store, that's
+   asked first and filled with data from a slower remote tvix-store.
+
+ * Multiple stores could be asked for the same data, and whatever store returns
+   the right data first wins.
+
+
+## Trust model / Distribution
+As already described above, the only non-content-addressed service is the
+`PathInfo` service.
+
+This means, all other messages (such as `Blob` and `Directory` messages) can be
+substituted from many different, untrusted sources/mirrors, which will make
+plugging in additional substitution strategies like IPFS, local network
+neighbors super simple. That's also why it's living in the `tvix-castore` crate.
+
+As for `PathInfo`, we don't specify an additional signature mechanism yet, but
+carry the NAR-based signatures from Nix along.
+
+This means, if we don't trust a remote `PathInfo` object, we currently need to
+"stream" the NAR representation to validate these signatures.
+
+However, the slow part is downloading of NAR files, and considering we have
+more granularity available, we might only need to download some small blobs,
+rather than a whole NAR file.
+
+A future signature mechanism, that is only signing (parts of) the `PathInfo`
+message, which only points to content-addressed data will enable verified
+partial access into a store path, opening up opportunities for lazy filesystem
+access etc.
+
+
+
+[blake3]: https://github.com/BLAKE3-team/BLAKE3
+[bao]: https://github.com/oconnor663/bao
+[^input-addressed]: Nix hashes the A-Term representation of a .drv, after doing
+                    some replacements on refered Input Derivations to calculate
+                    output paths.
+[^n+1query]: This would expose an N+1 query problem. However it's not a problem
+             in practice, as there's usually always a "local" caching store in
+             the loop, and *DirectoryService* supports a recursive lookup for
+             all `Directory` children of a `Directory`