diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'third_party/git/Documentation/technical/racy-git.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | third_party/git/Documentation/technical/racy-git.txt | 201 |
1 files changed, 201 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/third_party/git/Documentation/technical/racy-git.txt b/third_party/git/Documentation/technical/racy-git.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ceda4bbfda4d --- /dev/null +++ b/third_party/git/Documentation/technical/racy-git.txt @@ -0,0 +1,201 @@ +Use of index and Racy Git problem +================================= + +Background +---------- + +The index is one of the most important data structures in Git. +It represents a virtual working tree state by recording list of +paths and their object names and serves as a staging area to +write out the next tree object to be committed. The state is +"virtual" in the sense that it does not necessarily have to, and +often does not, match the files in the working tree. + +There are cases Git needs to examine the differences between the +virtual working tree state in the index and the files in the +working tree. The most obvious case is when the user asks `git +diff` (or its low level implementation, `git diff-files`) or +`git-ls-files --modified`. In addition, Git internally checks +if the files in the working tree are different from what are +recorded in the index to avoid stomping on local changes in them +during patch application, switching branches, and merging. + +In order to speed up this comparison between the files in the +working tree and the index entries, the index entries record the +information obtained from the filesystem via `lstat(2)` system +call when they were last updated. When checking if they differ, +Git first runs `lstat(2)` on the files and compares the result +with this information (this is what was originally done by the +`ce_match_stat()` function, but the current code does it in +`ce_match_stat_basic()` function). If some of these "cached +stat information" fields do not match, Git can tell that the +files are modified without even looking at their contents. + +Note: not all members in `struct stat` obtained via `lstat(2)` +are used for this comparison. For example, `st_atime` obviously +is not useful. Currently, Git compares the file type (regular +files vs symbolic links) and executable bits (only for regular +files) from `st_mode` member, `st_mtime` and `st_ctime` +timestamps, `st_uid`, `st_gid`, `st_ino`, and `st_size` members. +With a `USE_STDEV` compile-time option, `st_dev` is also +compared, but this is not enabled by default because this member +is not stable on network filesystems. With `USE_NSEC` +compile-time option, `st_mtim.tv_nsec` and `st_ctim.tv_nsec` +members are also compared. On Linux, this is not enabled by default +because in-core timestamps can have finer granularity than +on-disk timestamps, resulting in meaningless changes when an +inode is evicted from the inode cache. See commit 8ce13b0 +of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git +([PATCH] Sync in core time granularity with filesystems, +2005-01-04). This patch is included in kernel 2.6.11 and newer, but +only fixes the issue for file systems with exactly 1 ns or 1 s +resolution. Other file systems are still broken in current Linux +kernels (e.g. CEPH, CIFS, NTFS, UDF), see +https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5577240D.7020309@gmail.com/ + +Racy Git +-------- + +There is one slight problem with the optimization based on the +cached stat information. Consider this sequence: + + : modify 'foo' + $ git update-index 'foo' + : modify 'foo' again, in-place, without changing its size + +The first `update-index` computes the object name of the +contents of file `foo` and updates the index entry for `foo` +along with the `struct stat` information. If the modification +that follows it happens very fast so that the file's `st_mtime` +timestamp does not change, after this sequence, the cached stat +information the index entry records still exactly match what you +would see in the filesystem, even though the file `foo` is now +different. +This way, Git can incorrectly think files in the working tree +are unmodified even though they actually are. This is called +the "racy Git" problem (discovered by Pasky), and the entries +that appear clean when they may not be because of this problem +are called "racily clean". + +To avoid this problem, Git does two things: + +. When the cached stat information says the file has not been + modified, and the `st_mtime` is the same as (or newer than) + the timestamp of the index file itself (which is the time `git + update-index foo` finished running in the above example), it + also compares the contents with the object registered in the + index entry to make sure they match. + +. When the index file is updated that contains racily clean + entries, cached `st_size` information is truncated to zero + before writing a new version of the index file. + +Because the index file itself is written after collecting all +the stat information from updated paths, `st_mtime` timestamp of +it is usually the same as or newer than any of the paths the +index contains. And no matter how quick the modification that +follows `git update-index foo` finishes, the resulting +`st_mtime` timestamp on `foo` cannot get a value earlier +than the index file. Therefore, index entries that can be +racily clean are limited to the ones that have the same +timestamp as the index file itself. + +The callers that want to check if an index entry matches the +corresponding file in the working tree continue to call +`ce_match_stat()`, but with this change, `ce_match_stat()` uses +`ce_modified_check_fs()` to see if racily clean ones are +actually clean after comparing the cached stat information using +`ce_match_stat_basic()`. + +The problem the latter solves is this sequence: + + $ git update-index 'foo' + : modify 'foo' in-place without changing its size + : wait for enough time + $ git update-index 'bar' + +Without the latter, the timestamp of the index file gets a newer +value, and falsely clean entry `foo` would not be caught by the +timestamp comparison check done with the former logic anymore. +The latter makes sure that the cached stat information for `foo` +would never match with the file in the working tree, so later +checks by `ce_match_stat_basic()` would report that the index entry +does not match the file and Git does not have to fall back on more +expensive `ce_modified_check_fs()`. + + +Runtime penalty +--------------- + +The runtime penalty of falling back to `ce_modified_check_fs()` +from `ce_match_stat()` can be very expensive when there are many +racily clean entries. An obvious way to artificially create +this situation is to give the same timestamp to all the files in +the working tree in a large project, run `git update-index` on +them, and give the same timestamp to the index file: + + $ date >.datestamp + $ git ls-files | xargs touch -r .datestamp + $ git ls-files | git update-index --stdin + $ touch -r .datestamp .git/index + +This will make all index entries racily clean. The linux project, for +example, there are over 20,000 files in the working tree. On my +Athlon 64 X2 3800+, after the above: + + $ /usr/bin/time git diff-files + 1.68user 0.54system 0:02.22elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k + 0inputs+0outputs (0major+67111minor)pagefaults 0swaps + $ git update-index MAINTAINERS + $ /usr/bin/time git diff-files + 0.02user 0.12system 0:00.14elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k + 0inputs+0outputs (0major+935minor)pagefaults 0swaps + +Running `git update-index` in the middle checked the racily +clean entries, and left the cached `st_mtime` for all the paths +intact because they were actually clean (so this step took about +the same amount of time as the first `git diff-files`). After +that, they are not racily clean anymore but are truly clean, so +the second invocation of `git diff-files` fully took advantage +of the cached stat information. + + +Avoiding runtime penalty +------------------------ + +In order to avoid the above runtime penalty, post 1.4.2 Git used +to have a code that made sure the index file +got timestamp newer than the youngest files in the index when +there are many young files with the same timestamp as the +resulting index file would otherwise would have by waiting +before finishing writing the index file out. + +I suspected that in practice the situation where many paths in the +index are all racily clean was quite rare. The only code paths +that can record recent timestamp for large number of paths are: + +. Initial `git add .` of a large project. + +. `git checkout` of a large project from an empty index into an + unpopulated working tree. + +Note: switching branches with `git checkout` keeps the cached +stat information of existing working tree files that are the +same between the current branch and the new branch, which are +all older than the resulting index file, and they will not +become racily clean. Only the files that are actually checked +out can become racily clean. + +In a large project where raciness avoidance cost really matters, +however, the initial computation of all object names in the +index takes more than one second, and the index file is written +out after all that happens. Therefore the timestamp of the +index file will be more than one seconds later than the +youngest file in the working tree. This means that in these +cases there actually will not be any racily clean entry in +the resulting index. + +Based on this discussion, the current code does not use the +"workaround" to avoid the runtime penalty that does not exist in +practice anymore. This was done with commit 0fc82cff on Aug 15, +2006. |