about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/absl/container
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'absl/container')
-rw-r--r--absl/container/internal/raw_hash_set_test.cc138
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 138 deletions
diff --git a/absl/container/internal/raw_hash_set_test.cc b/absl/container/internal/raw_hash_set_test.cc
index 9d92e15c5206..76aba318da8d 100644
--- a/absl/container/internal/raw_hash_set_test.cc
+++ b/absl/container/internal/raw_hash_set_test.cc
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
 
 #include "absl/container/internal/raw_hash_set.h"
 
-#include <array>
 #include <cmath>
 #include <cstdint>
 #include <deque>
@@ -1782,143 +1781,6 @@ TEST(Table, IterationOrderChangesForSmallTables) {
   FAIL() << "Iteration order remained the same across many attempts.";
 }
 
-// Fill the table to 3 different load factors (min, median, max) and evaluate
-// the percentage of perfect hits using the debug API.
-template <class Table, class AddFn>
-std::vector<double> CollectPerfectRatios(Table, AddFn add) {
-  std::vector<double> results(3);
-
-  constexpr size_t kNumTrials = 10;
-  std::vector<Table> tables(kNumTrials);
-
-  for (Table& t : tables) {
-    using Key = typename Table::key_type;
-
-    // First, fill enough to have a good distribution.
-    constexpr size_t kMinSize = 10000;
-    std::vector<Key> keys;
-    while (t.size() < kMinSize) keys.push_back(add(t));
-    // Then, insert until we reach min load factor.
-    double lf = t.load_factor();
-    while (lf <= t.load_factor()) keys.push_back(add(t));
-
-    // We are now at min load factor. Take a snapshot.
-    size_t perfect = 0;
-    auto update_perfect = [&](Key k) {
-      perfect += GetHashtableDebugNumProbes(t, k) == 0;
-    };
-    for (const auto& k : keys) update_perfect(k);
-
-    std::vector<double> perfect_ratios;
-    // Keep going until we hit max load factor.
-    while (t.load_factor() < .6) {
-      perfect_ratios.push_back(1.0 * perfect / t.size());
-      update_perfect(add(t));
-    }
-    while (t.load_factor() > .5) {
-      perfect_ratios.push_back(1.0 * perfect / t.size());
-      update_perfect(add(t));
-    }
-
-    results[0] += perfect_ratios.front();
-    results[1] += perfect_ratios[perfect_ratios.size() / 2];
-    results[2] += perfect_ratios.back();
-  }
-
-  results[0] /= kNumTrials;
-  results[1] /= kNumTrials;
-  results[2] /= kNumTrials;
-
-  return results;
-}
-
-std::vector<std::pair<double, double>> StringTablePefectRatios() {
-  constexpr bool kRandomizesInserts =
-#if NDEBUG
-      false;
-#else   // NDEBUG
-      true;
-#endif  // NDEBUG
-
-  // The effective load factor is larger in non-opt mode because we insert
-  // elements out of order.
-  switch (container_internal::Group::kWidth) {
-    case 8:
-      if (kRandomizesInserts) {
-        return {{0.986, 0.02}, {0.95, 0.02}, {0.89, 0.02}};
-      } else {
-        return {{0.995, 0.01}, {0.97, 0.01}, {0.89, 0.02}};
-      }
-    case 16:
-      if (kRandomizesInserts) {
-        return {{0.973, 0.01}, {0.965, 0.01}, {0.92, 0.02}};
-      } else {
-        return {{0.995, 0.005}, {0.99, 0.005}, {0.94, 0.01}};
-      }
-  }
-  ABSL_RAW_LOG(FATAL, "%s", "Unknown Group width");
-  return {};
-}
-
-// This is almost a change detector, but it allows us to know how we are
-// affecting the probe distribution.
-TEST(Table, EffectiveLoadFactorStrings) {
-  std::vector<double> perfect_ratios =
-      CollectPerfectRatios(StringTable(), [](StringTable& t) {
-        return t.emplace(std::to_string(t.size()), "").first->first;
-      });
-
-  auto ratios = StringTablePefectRatios();
-  if (ratios.empty()) return;
-  EXPECT_THAT(perfect_ratios,
-              ElementsAre(DoubleNear(ratios[0].first, ratios[0].second),
-                          DoubleNear(ratios[1].first, ratios[1].second),
-                          DoubleNear(ratios[2].first, ratios[2].second)));
-}
-
-std::vector<std::pair<double, double>> IntTablePefectRatios() {
-  constexpr bool kRandomizesInserts =
-#ifdef NDEBUG
-      false;
-#else   // NDEBUG
-      true;
-#endif  // NDEBUG
-
-  // The effective load factor is larger in non-opt mode because we insert
-  // elements out of order.
-  switch (container_internal::Group::kWidth) {
-    case 8:
-      if (kRandomizesInserts) {
-        return {{0.99, 0.02}, {0.985, 0.02}, {0.95, 0.05}};
-      } else {
-        return {{0.99, 0.01}, {0.99, 0.01}, {0.95, 0.02}};
-      }
-    case 16:
-      if (kRandomizesInserts) {
-        return {{0.98, 0.02}, {0.978, 0.02}, {0.96, 0.02}};
-      } else {
-        return {{0.998, 0.003}, {0.995, 0.01}, {0.975, 0.02}};
-      }
-  }
-  ABSL_RAW_LOG(FATAL, "%s", "Unknown Group width");
-  return {};
-}
-
-// This is almost a change detector, but it allows us to know how we are
-// affecting the probe distribution.
-TEST(Table, EffectiveLoadFactorInts) {
-  std::vector<double> perfect_ratios = CollectPerfectRatios(
-      IntTable(), [](IntTable& t) { return *t.emplace(t.size()).first; });
-
-  auto ratios = IntTablePefectRatios();
-  if (ratios.empty()) return;
-
-  EXPECT_THAT(perfect_ratios,
-              ElementsAre(DoubleNear(ratios[0].first, ratios[0].second),
-                          DoubleNear(ratios[1].first, ratios[1].second),
-                          DoubleNear(ratios[2].first, ratios[2].second)));
-}
-
 // Confirm that we assert if we try to erase() end().
 TEST(TableDeathTest, EraseOfEndAsserts) {
   // Use an assert with side-effects to figure out if they are actually enabled.