diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'absl/base/exception_safety_testing_test.cc')
| -rw-r--r-- | absl/base/exception_safety_testing_test.cc | 60 |
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 30 deletions
diff --git a/absl/base/exception_safety_testing_test.cc b/absl/base/exception_safety_testing_test.cc index 9141e39c796b..106bc34b00f7 100644 --- a/absl/base/exception_safety_testing_test.cc +++ b/absl/base/exception_safety_testing_test.cc @@ -548,21 +548,21 @@ TEST(ExceptionSafetyTesterTest, IncompleteTypesAreNotTestable) { // Test that providing operation and inveriants still does not allow for the // the invocation of .Test() and .Test(op) because it lacks a factory auto without_fac = - testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithOperation(op).WithInvariants( + testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithOperation(op).WithContracts( inv, testing::strong_guarantee); EXPECT_FALSE(HasNullaryTest(without_fac)); EXPECT_FALSE(HasUnaryTest(without_fac)); - // Test that providing invariants and factory allows the invocation of + // Test that providing contracts and factory allows the invocation of // .Test(op) but does not allow for .Test() because it lacks an operation auto without_op = testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester() - .WithInvariants(inv, testing::strong_guarantee) + .WithContracts(inv, testing::strong_guarantee) .WithFactory(fac); EXPECT_FALSE(HasNullaryTest(without_op)); EXPECT_TRUE(HasUnaryTest(without_op)); // Test that providing operation and factory still does not allow for the - // the invocation of .Test() and .Test(op) because it lacks invariants + // the invocation of .Test() and .Test(op) because it lacks contracts auto without_inv = testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithOperation(op).WithFactory(fac); EXPECT_FALSE(HasNullaryTest(without_inv)); @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ std::unique_ptr<ExampleStruct> ExampleFunctionFactory() { void ExampleFunctionOperation(ExampleStruct*) {} -testing::AssertionResult ExampleFunctionInvariant(ExampleStruct*) { +testing::AssertionResult ExampleFunctionContract(ExampleStruct*) { return testing::AssertionSuccess(); } @@ -593,16 +593,16 @@ struct { struct { testing::AssertionResult operator()(ExampleStruct* example_struct) const { - return ExampleFunctionInvariant(example_struct); + return ExampleFunctionContract(example_struct); } -} example_struct_invariant; +} example_struct_contract; auto example_lambda_factory = []() { return ExampleFunctionFactory(); }; auto example_lambda_operation = [](ExampleStruct*) {}; -auto example_lambda_invariant = [](ExampleStruct* example_struct) { - return ExampleFunctionInvariant(example_struct); +auto example_lambda_contract = [](ExampleStruct* example_struct) { + return ExampleFunctionContract(example_struct); }; // Testing that function references, pointers, structs with operator() and @@ -612,28 +612,28 @@ TEST(ExceptionSafetyTesterTest, MixedFunctionTypes) { EXPECT_TRUE(testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester() .WithFactory(ExampleFunctionFactory) .WithOperation(ExampleFunctionOperation) - .WithInvariants(ExampleFunctionInvariant) + .WithContracts(ExampleFunctionContract) .Test()); // function pointer EXPECT_TRUE(testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester() .WithFactory(&ExampleFunctionFactory) .WithOperation(&ExampleFunctionOperation) - .WithInvariants(&ExampleFunctionInvariant) + .WithContracts(&ExampleFunctionContract) .Test()); // struct EXPECT_TRUE(testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester() .WithFactory(example_struct_factory) .WithOperation(example_struct_operation) - .WithInvariants(example_struct_invariant) + .WithContracts(example_struct_contract) .Test()); // lambda EXPECT_TRUE(testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester() .WithFactory(example_lambda_factory) .WithOperation(example_lambda_operation) - .WithInvariants(example_lambda_invariant) + .WithContracts(example_lambda_contract) .Test()); } @@ -658,9 +658,9 @@ struct { } invoker; auto tester = - testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithOperation(invoker).WithInvariants( + testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithOperation(invoker).WithContracts( CheckNonNegativeInvariants); -auto strong_tester = tester.WithInvariants(testing::strong_guarantee); +auto strong_tester = tester.WithContracts(testing::strong_guarantee); struct FailsBasicGuarantee : public NonNegative { void operator()() { @@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, StrongGuaranteeFailure) { EXPECT_FALSE(strong_tester.WithInitialValue(FollowsBasicGuarantee{}).Test()); } -struct BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants : public NonNegative { +struct BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts : public NonNegative { // After operator(), i is incremented. If operator() throws, i is set to 9999 void operator()() { int old_i = i; @@ -701,21 +701,21 @@ struct BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants : public NonNegative { static constexpr int kExceptionSentinel = 9999; }; -constexpr int BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants::kExceptionSentinel; +constexpr int BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts::kExceptionSentinel; -TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants) { +TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts) { auto tester_with_val = - tester.WithInitialValue(BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants{}); + tester.WithInitialValue(BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts{}); EXPECT_TRUE(tester_with_val.Test()); EXPECT_TRUE( tester_with_val - .WithInvariants([](BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants* o) { - if (o->i == BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants::kExceptionSentinel) { + .WithContracts([](BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts* o) { + if (o->i == BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts::kExceptionSentinel) { return testing::AssertionSuccess(); } return testing::AssertionFailure() << "i should be " - << BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants::kExceptionSentinel + << BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts::kExceptionSentinel << ", but is " << o->i; }) .Test()); @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ struct HasReset : public NonNegative { void reset() { i = 0; } }; -testing::AssertionResult CheckHasResetInvariants(HasReset* h) { +testing::AssertionResult CheckHasResetContracts(HasReset* h) { h->reset(); return testing::AssertionResult(h->i == 0); } @@ -759,14 +759,14 @@ TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, ModifyingChecker) { }; EXPECT_FALSE(tester.WithInitialValue(FollowsBasicGuarantee{}) - .WithInvariants(set_to_1000, is_1000) + .WithContracts(set_to_1000, is_1000) .Test()); EXPECT_TRUE(strong_tester.WithInitialValue(FollowsStrongGuarantee{}) - .WithInvariants(increment) + .WithContracts(increment) .Test()); EXPECT_TRUE(testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester() .WithInitialValue(HasReset{}) - .WithInvariants(CheckHasResetInvariants) + .WithContracts(CheckHasResetContracts) .Test(invoker)); } @@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, NonEqualityComparable) { return testing::AssertionResult(nec->i == NonEqualityComparable().i); }; auto strong_nec_tester = tester.WithInitialValue(NonEqualityComparable{}) - .WithInvariants(nec_is_strong); + .WithContracts(nec_is_strong); EXPECT_TRUE(strong_nec_tester.Test()); EXPECT_FALSE(strong_nec_tester.Test( @@ -833,14 +833,14 @@ struct { testing::AssertionResult operator()(ExhaustivenessTester<T>*) const { return testing::AssertionSuccess(); } -} CheckExhaustivenessTesterInvariants; +} CheckExhaustivenessTesterContracts; template <typename T> unsigned char ExhaustivenessTester<T>::successes = 0; TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, Exhaustiveness) { auto exhaust_tester = testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester() - .WithInvariants(CheckExhaustivenessTesterInvariants) + .WithContracts(CheckExhaustivenessTesterContracts) .WithOperation(invoker); EXPECT_TRUE( @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, Exhaustiveness) { EXPECT_TRUE( exhaust_tester.WithInitialValue(ExhaustivenessTester<ThrowingValue<>>{}) - .WithInvariants(testing::strong_guarantee) + .WithContracts(testing::strong_guarantee) .Test()); EXPECT_EQ(ExhaustivenessTester<ThrowingValue<>>::successes, 0xF); } |