diff options
author | sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> | 2022-09-26T21·46+0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> | 2022-10-08T10·59+0000 |
commit | 57d5988b340ec1b799882f00323010d9435892ca (patch) | |
tree | dadde22436ba1e502b2b2c50d57dc1f797950be3 /users/tazjin/predlozhnik/Cargo.toml | |
parent | ca3bd5c7cabf517f23234501928912d55fef45b3 (diff) |
feat(nix/dependency-analyzer): find deps among a list of known drvs r/5060
This was written with the same intention (and reuses a little of its code) as cl/5060 and cl/5063: We want to be able to emit dependencies between //nix/buildkite pipeline steps, so that no agent is occupied with waiting on locks for derivations built by a different agent. This dependency information is already available to the Nix store implementation (e.g. via `nix-store --query --references`) and can also be obtained in the Nix language which is important, since the pipeline is generated at evaluation time. (Note: For Nix 2.3, you either need a strong convention about how derivations expose their dependencies (which we don't) or rely on store implementation internals (drv files). For Nix 2.6 there is a better trick, but it also relies on the existence of drv files.) The actual task can be formulated as follows: Given a set of derivations, calculate the the closest derivations also in the input each derivation depends on. (We call these (next) known dependencies.) This is crucial because pipeline step often depend on each other only indirectly with any number of intermediate derivations. For cl/5064 I determined that 6 intermediate layers is quite common for dependencies that are perceived to be “direct”. This problem is solved as follows: 1. Calculate the dependency graph of the combined dependency closure of all input derivations. This is quite easy and fairly quick thanks to the C++ implementation of builtins.genericClosure. One weak point of the current implementation is that the function to determine the direct derivation dependencies for Nix < 2.6 is quite hacky. 2. Take the graph from 1. and calculate a dependency graph that only connects the known derivations of the input, but retains all connections between them (minus intermediate nodes). In practice the dependency graph is represented as an attribute set mapping derivation paths to a list of derivation paths it depends on. The second step is performed by adding a second list of known derivation paths it depends on. The main improvements over the previous concept (cl/5060 and cl/5063): * We only try to find the closest known dependencies in the dependency graph whereas we would traverse emit dependencies for the entire dependency closure. * We immediately store the calculation of the closest known dependency in the dependency graph, even for intermediate nodes. This avoids recalculating the connection (which was a big drawback of the previous approach) and makes the calculation itself cheaper. You can run `mg build //nix/dependency-analyzer:example` to build a visualization of the internal dependencies between `depot.ci.targets` as discovered by dependency-analyzer. Change-Id: If8c0cdfc8470d4b337336257d9818aaa0d51110f Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6832 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Diffstat (limited to 'users/tazjin/predlozhnik/Cargo.toml')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions