diff options
author | sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> | 2021-02-18T00·33+0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org> | 2021-02-19T16·14+0000 |
commit | 690994a28cc3045c14268996144e9302fa43bf68 (patch) | |
tree | 54386d6fcb9f04ff1fb18f8be4b6477cdaa3e759 /users/edef | |
parent | e628862e97acc5cd9aa2c9da86f26edd6d14605c (diff) |
fix(nix/yants): make (typedef …).checkType return a result set r/2222
Previously, for types defined using typedef (like all primitive types) type.checkType would return a boolean. This is largely fine since in most places `type.checkToBool (type.checkType x)` or similar is used. However, some functions actually take type.checkType up on the promise that it returns a set of the form: { ok = <bool>; err = <option string>; } This is the case for restrict which has checkToBool = v: v.ok; and will generate a proper set except if `t.checkToBool (t.checkType v) == false` in which case it will return t.checkType v. If t was a primitive type or defined using typedef, previously `t.checkType v` would be a boolean which meant as soon as (restrict …).checkToBool was called on a restrict checkType result in cases where the wrapped type didn't match, an unrelated error would be thrown: nix-repl> with nix.yants; restrict "foo" (_: true) int "lol" error: value is a boolean while a set was expected, at /home/lukas/src/depot/nix/yants/default.nix:38:39 This is fixed by making typedef return a proper set from checkType and adjusting its checkToBool accordingly. Unfortunately I don't think we can easily add test cases for this except by using recursive nix or VM tests as there is no way to introspect error messages. Change-Id: I96a7be065630f04ca33358f21809284911ec14fe Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/2536 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: tazjin <mail@tazj.in> Reviewed-by: Profpatsch <mail@profpatsch.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'users/edef')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions