docs(tvix/castore/blobstore): reorganize docs r/7479

docs/verified-streaming.md explained how CDC and verified streaming can
work together, but didn't really highlight enough how chunking in
general also helps with seeking.

In addition, a lot of the thoughts w.r.t. the BlobStore protocol, both
gRPC and Rust traits, as well as why there's no support for seeking
directly in gRPC, as well as how clients should behave w.r.t. chunked
fetching was missing, or mixed together with the verified streaming
bits.

While there is no verified streaming version yet, a chunked one is
coming soon, and documenting this a bit better is gonna make it easier
to understand, as well as provide some lookout on where this is heading.

Change-Id: Ib11b8ccf2ef82f9f3a43b36103df0ad64a9b68ce
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/10733
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: Connor Brewster <cbrewster@hey.com>

1 files changed, 147 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tvix/castore/docs/blobstore-chunking.md b/tvix/castore/docs/blobstore-chunking.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..49bbe6927554
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tvix/castore/docs/blobstore-chunking.md
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+# BlobStore: Chunking & Verified Streaming
+
+`tvix-castore`'s BlobStore is a content-addressed storage system, using [blake3]
+as hash function.
+
+Returned data is fetched by using the digest as lookup key, and can be verified
+to be correct by feeding the received data through the hash function and
+ensuring it matches the digest initially used for the lookup.
+
+This means, data can be downloaded by any untrusted third-party as well, as the
+received data is validated to match the digest it was originally requested with.
+
+However, for larger blobs of data, having to download the entire blob at once is
+wasteful, if we only care about a part of the blob. Think about mounting a
+seekable data structure, like loop-mounting an .iso file, or doing partial reads
+in a large Parquet file, a column-oriented data format.
+
+> We want to have the possibility to *seek* into a larger file.
+
+This however shouldn't compromise on data integrity properties - we should not
+need to trust a peer we're downloading from to be "honest" about the partial
+data we're reading. We should be able to verify smaller reads.
+
+Especially when substituting from an untrusted third-party, we want to be able
+to detect quickly if that third-party is sending us wrong data, and terminate
+the connection early.
+
+## Chunking
+In content-addressed systems, this problem has historically been solved by
+breaking larger blobs into smaller chunks, which can be fetched individually,
+and making a hash of *this listing* the blob digest/identifier.
+
+ - BitTorrent for example breaks files up into smaller chunks, and maintains
+   a list of sha1 digests for each of these chunks. Magnet links contain a
+   digest over this listing as an identifier. (See [bittorrent-v2][here for
+   more details]).
+   With the identifier, a client can fetch the entire list, and then recursively
+   "unpack the graph" of nodes, until it ends up with a list of individual small
+   chunks, which can be fetched individually.
+ - Similarly, IPFS with its IPLD model builds up a Merkle DAG, and uses the
+   digest of the root node as an identitier.
+
+These approaches solve the problem of being able to fetch smaller chunks in a
+trusted fashion. They can also do some deduplication, in case there's the same
+leaf nodes same leaf nodes in multiple places.
+
+However, they also have a big disadvantage. The chunking parameters, and the
+"topology" of the graph structure itself "bleed" into the root hash of the
+entire data structure itself.
+
+Depending on the chunking parameters used, there's different representations for
+the same data, causing less data sharing/reuse in the overall system, in terms of how
+many chunks need to be downloaded vs. are already available locally, as well as
+how compact data is stored on-disk.
+
+This can be workarounded by agreeing on only a single way of chunking, but it's
+not pretty and misses a lot of deduplication potential.
+
+### Chunking in Tvix' Blobstore
+tvix-castore's BlobStore uses a hybrid approach to eliminate some of the
+disadvantages, while still being content-addressed internally, with the
+highlighted benefits.
+
+It uses [blake3] as hash function, and the blake3 digest of **the raw data
+itself** as an identifier (rather than some application-specific Merkle DAG that
+also embeds some chunking information).
+
+BLAKE3 is a tree hash where all left nodes fully populated, contrary to
+conventional serial hash functions. To be able to validate the hash of a node,
+one only needs the hash of the (2) children [^1], if any.
+
+This means one only needs to the root digest to validate a constructions, and these
+constructions can be sent [separately][bao-spec].
+
+This relieves us from the need of having to encode more granular chunking into
+our data model / identifier upfront, but can make this a mostly a transport/
+storage concern.
+
+For the some more description on the (remote) protocol, check
+`./blobstore-protocol.md`.
+
+#### Logical vs. physical chunking
+
+Due to the properties of the BLAKE3 hash function, we have logical blocks of
+1KiB, but this doesn't necessarily imply we need to restrict ourselves to these
+chunk sizes w.r.t. what "physical chunks" are sent over the wire between peers,
+or are stored on-disk.
+
+The only thing we need to be able to read and verify an arbitrary byte range is
+having the covering range of aligned 1K blocks, and a construction from the root
+digest to the 1K block.
+
+Note the intermediate hash tree can be further trimmed, [omitting][bao-tree]
+lower parts of the tree while still providing verified streaming - at the cost
+of having to fetch larger covering ranges of aligned blocks.
+
+Let's pick an example. We identify each KiB by a number here for illustrational
+purposes.
+
+Assuming we omit the last two layers of the hash tree, we end up with logical
+4KiB leaf chunks (`bao_shift` of `2`).
+
+For a blob of 14 KiB total size, we could fetch logical blocks `[0..=3]`,
+`[4..=7]`, `[8..=11]` and `[12..=13]` in an authenticated fashion:
+
+`[ 0 1 2 3 ] [ 4 5 6 7 ] [ 8 9 10 11 ] [ 12 13 ]`
+
+Assuming the server now informs us about the following physical chunking:
+
+```
+[ 0 1 ] [ 2 3 4 5 ] [ 6 ] [ 7 8 ] [ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ]`
+```
+
+If our application now wants to arbitrarily read from 0 until 4 (inclusive):
+
+```
+[ 0 1 ] [ 2 3 4 5 ] [ 6 ] [ 7 8 ] [ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ]
+ |-------------|
+
+```
+
+…we need to fetch physical chunks `[ 0 1 ]`, `[ 2 3 4 5 ]` and `[ 6 ] [ 7 8 ]`.
+
+
+`[ 0 1 ]` and `[ 2 3 4 5 ]` are obvious, they contain the data we're
+interested in.
+
+We however also need to fetch the physical chunks `[ 6 ]` and `[ 7 8 ]`, so we
+can assemble `[ 4 5 6 7 ]` to verify both logical chunks:
+
+```
+[ 0 1 ] [ 2 3 4 5 ] [ 6 ] [ 7 8 ] [ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ]
+^       ^           ^     ^
+|----4KiB----|------4KiB-----|
+```
+
+Each physical chunk fetched can be validated to have the blake3 digest that was
+communicated upfront, and can be stored in a client-side cache/storage, so
+subsequent / other requests for the same data will be fast(er).
+
+---
+
+[^1]: and the surrounding context, aka position inside the whole blob, which is available while verifying the tree
+[bittorrent-v2]: https://blog.libtorrent.org/2020/09/bittorrent-v2/
+[blake3]: https://github.com/BLAKE3-team/BLAKE3
+[bao-spec]: https://github.com/oconnor663/bao/blob/master/docs/spec.md
+[bao-tree]: https://github.com/n0-computer/bao-tree