feat(server): Order layers in image manifest based on merge rating

Image layers in manifests are now sorted in a stable (descending)
order based on their merge rating, meaning that layers more likely to
be shared between images come first.

The reason for this change is Docker's handling of image layers on
overlayfs2: Images are condensed into a single representation on disk
after downloading.

Due to this Docker will constantly redownload all layers that are
applied in a different order in different images (layer order matters
in imperatively created images), based on something it calls the
'ChainID'.

Sorting the layers this way raises the likelihood of a long chain of
matching layers at the beginning of an image.

This relates to #39.

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/tools/nixery/server/layers/grouping.go b/tools/nixery/server/layers/grouping.go
index 07a9e0e230a5..9992cd3c13d6 100644
--- a/tools/nixery/server/layers/grouping.go
+++ b/tools/nixery/server/layers/grouping.go
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ type Popularity = map[string]int
 // build for the container image.
 type Layer struct {
 	Contents    []string `json:"contents"`
-	mergeRating uint64
+	MergeRating uint64
 }
 
 // Hash the contents of a layer to create a deterministic identifier that can be
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ func (l *Layer) Hash() string {
 
 func (a Layer) merge(b Layer) Layer {
 	a.Contents = append(a.Contents, b.Contents...)
-	a.mergeRating += b.mergeRating
+	a.MergeRating += b.MergeRating
 	return a
 }
 
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ func groupLayer(dt *flow.DominatorTree, root *closure) Layer {
 		// both the size and the popularity when making merge
 		// decisions, but there might be a smarter way to do
 		// it than a plain multiplication.
-		mergeRating: uint64(root.Popularity) * size,
+		MergeRating: uint64(root.Popularity) * size,
 	}
 }
 
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ func dominate(budget int, graph *simple.DirectedGraph) []Layer {
 	}
 
 	sort.Slice(layers, func(i, j int) bool {
-		return layers[i].mergeRating < layers[j].mergeRating
+		return layers[i].MergeRating < layers[j].MergeRating
 	})
 
 	if len(layers) > budget {