Clarify error message for hash mismatches (again)

This is arguably nitpicky, but I think this new formulation is even
clearer. My thinking is that it's easier to comprehend when the
calculated hash value is displayed close to the output path. (I think it
is somewhat similar to eliminating double negatives in logic
statements.)

The formulation is inspired / copied from the OpenEmbedded build tool,
bitbake.

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/src/libstore/build.cc b/src/libstore/build.cc
index 1c751ab98734..70c4540bcdf1 100644
--- a/src/libstore/build.cc
+++ b/src/libstore/build.cc
@@ -2736,8 +2736,8 @@ void DerivationGoal::registerOutputs()
             Hash h2 = recursive ? hashPath(ht, actualPath).first : hashFile(ht, actualPath);
             if (h != h2)
                 throw BuildError(
-                    format("Nix expects output path ‘%1%’ to have %2% hash ‘%3%’, instead it has ‘%4%’")
-                    % path % i.second.hashAlgo % printHash16or32(h) % printHash16or32(h2));
+                    format("output path ‘%1%’ has %2% hash ‘%3%’ when ‘%4%’ was expected")
+                    % path % i.second.hashAlgo % printHash16or32(h2) % printHash16or32(h));
         }
 
         /* Get rid of all weird permissions.  This also checks that