diff options
author | Vincent Ambo <vincent@kivra.com> | 2016-01-21T14·04+0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Vincent Ambo <vincent@kivra.com> | 2016-01-21T14·04+0100 |
commit | 8e06fe4d927d17555acea81b141426464c1b58f4 (patch) | |
tree | 1985332adb3a7701f2788cfdb4eb071c3f23867a /slides.pdfpc | |
parent | 487e936f3e9d739d300eb31855c9231f8768205b (diff) |
Add notes for adoption slide
Diffstat (limited to 'slides.pdfpc')
-rw-r--r-- | slides.pdfpc | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/slides.pdfpc b/slides.pdfpc index 1e20478f77ad..35fa8309e1ae 100644 --- a/slides.pdfpc +++ b/slides.pdfpc @@ -77,3 +77,9 @@ explain diagram a bit ### 17 opaque: as a result, systemd has a lot more internal complexity that people can't easily wrap your mind around. However I argue that unless you're using something like suckless' sinit with your own scripts, you probably have no idea what your init does today anyways unstable: this was definitely true even in the first stable release, with the binary log format getting corrupted for example. I haven't personally experienced any trouble with it recently though. +Another thing is that services start depending on systemd when they shouldn't, a problem for the BSD world (who cares (hey christoph!)) +### 18 +Despite criticism, systemd was adopted rapidly by large portions of the Linux +Initially in RedHat, because Poettering and co work there and it was clear from the beginning that it would be there +ArchLinux (which I'm using) and a few others followed suit quite quickly +Eventually, the big Debian init system discussion - after a lot of flaming - led to Debian adopting it as well, which had a ripple effect for related distros such as Ubuntu which abandoned upstart for it. |