Lint tree.el

- add Version, URL, Package-Requires sections
- prefer `tree-` prefer to `tree/`

1 files changed, 44 insertions, 40 deletions

diff --git a/emacs/.emacs.d/wpc/tree.el b/emacs/.emacs.d/wpc/tree.el
index 43df4dc500..8ef88e4efd 100644
--- a/emacs/.emacs.d/wpc/tree.el
+++ b/emacs/.emacs.d/wpc/tree.el
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
 ;;; tree.el --- Working with Trees -*- lexical-binding: t -*-
+
 ;; Author: William Carroll <wpcarro@gmail.com>
+;; Version: 0.0.1
+;; URL: https://git.wpcarro.dev/wpcarro/briefcase
+;; Package-Requires: ((emacs "25.1"))
 
 ;;; Commentary:
 ;; Some friendly functions that hopefully will make working with trees cheaper
@@ -42,12 +46,12 @@
 
 (cl-defstruct node value children)
 
-(cl-defun tree/node (value &optional children)
+(cl-defun tree-node (value &optional children)
   "Create a node struct of VALUE with CHILDREN."
   (make-node :value value
              :children children))
 
-(defun tree/reduce-breadth (acc f xs)
+(defun tree-reduce-breadth (acc f xs)
   "Reduce over XS breadth-first applying F to each x and ACC (in that order).
 Breadth-first traversals guarantee to find the shortest path in a graph.
   They're typically more difficult to implement than DFTs and may also incur
@@ -55,7 +59,7 @@ Breadth-first traversals guarantee to find the shortest path in a graph.
 
 ;; TODO: Support :order as 'pre | 'in | 'post.
 ;; TODO: Troubleshoot why I need defensive (nil? node) check.
-(defun tree/reduce-depth (acc f node)
+(defun tree-reduce-depth (acc f node)
   "Reduce over NODE depth-first applying F to each NODE and ACC.
 F is called with each NODE, ACC, and the current depth.
 Depth-first traversals have the advantage of typically consuming less memory
@@ -66,12 +70,12 @@ Depth-first traversals have the advantage of typically consuming less memory
                (acc f node depth)
                (let ((acc-new (funcall f node acc depth)))
                  (if (or (maybe/nil? node)
-                         (tree/leaf? node))
+                         (tree-leaf? node))
                      acc-new
                    (list/reduce
                     acc-new
                     (lambda (node acc)
-                      (tree/do-reduce-depth
+                      (tree-do-reduce-depth
                        acc
                        f
                        node
@@ -83,19 +87,19 @@ Depth-first traversals have the advantage of typically consuming less memory
 ;; Helpers
 ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
 
-(defun tree/height (xs)
+(defun tree-height (xs)
   "Return the height of tree XS.")
 
 ;; TODO: Troubleshoot why need for (nil? node).  Similar misgiving
 ;; above.
-(defun tree/leaf-depths (xs)
+(defun tree-leaf-depths (xs)
   "Return a list of all of the depths of the leaf nodes in XS."
   (list/reverse
-   (tree/reduce-depth
+   (tree-reduce-depth
     '()
     (lambda (node acc depth)
       (if (or (maybe/nil? node)
-              (tree/leaf? node))
+              (tree-leaf? node))
           (list/cons depth acc)
         acc))
     xs)))
@@ -109,7 +113,7 @@ Depth-first traversals have the advantage of typically consuming less memory
 
 ;; TODO: Bail out before stack overflowing by consider branching, current-depth.
 
-(cl-defun tree/random (&optional (value-fn (lambda (_) nil))
+(cl-defun tree-random (&optional (value-fn (lambda (_) nil))
                                  (branching-factor 2))
   "Randomly generate a tree with BRANCHING-FACTOR using VALUE-FN to compute the
 node values.  VALUE-FN is called with the current-depth of the node.  Useful for
@@ -129,20 +133,20 @@ generating test data.  Warning this function can overflow the stack."
 ;; Predicates
 ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
 
-(defun tree/instance? (tree)
+(defun tree-instance? (tree)
   "Return t if TREE is a tree struct."
   (node-p tree))
 
-(defun tree/leaf? (node)
+(defun tree-leaf? (node)
   "Return t if NODE has no children."
   (maybe/nil? (node-children node)))
 
-(defun tree/balanced? (n xs)
+(defun tree-balanced? (n xs)
   "Return t if the tree, XS, is balanced.
 A tree is balanced if none of the differences between any two depths of two leaf
   nodes in XS is greater than N."
   (> n (->> xs
-            tree/leaf-depths
+            tree-leaf-depths
             set/from-list
             set/count
             number/dec)))
@@ -151,7 +155,7 @@ A tree is balanced if none of the differences between any two depths of two leaf
 ;; Tests
 ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
 
-(defconst tree/enable-testing? t
+(defconst tree-enable-testing? t
   "When t, test suite runs.")
 
 ;; TODO: Create set of macros for a proper test suite including:
@@ -160,33 +164,33 @@ A tree is balanced if none of the differences between any two depths of two leaf
 ;; - line numbers for errors
 ;; - accumulated output for synopsis
 ;; - do we want describe *and* it? Why not a generic label that works for both?
-(when tree/enable-testing?
-  (let ((tree-a (tree/node 1
-                           (list (tree/node 2
-                                            (list (tree/node 5)
-                                                  (tree/node 6)))
-                                 (tree/node 3
-                                            (list (tree/node 7)
-                                                  (tree/node 8)))
-                                 (tree/node 4
-                                            (list (tree/node 9)
-                                                  (tree/node 10))))))
-        (tree-b (tree/node 1
-                           (list (tree/node 2
-                                            (list (tree/node 5)
-                                                  (tree/node 6)))
-                                 (tree/node 3)
-                                 (tree/node 4
-                                            (list (tree/node 9)
-                                                  (tree/node 10)))))))
+(when tree-enable-testing?
+  (let ((tree-a (tree-node 1
+                           (list (tree-node 2
+                                            (list (tree-node 5)
+                                                  (tree-node 6)))
+                                 (tree-node 3
+                                            (list (tree-node 7)
+                                                  (tree-node 8)))
+                                 (tree-node 4
+                                            (list (tree-node 9)
+                                                  (tree-node 10))))))
+        (tree-b (tree-node 1
+                           (list (tree-node 2
+                                            (list (tree-node 5)
+                                                  (tree-node 6)))
+                                 (tree-node 3)
+                                 (tree-node 4
+                                            (list (tree-node 9)
+                                                  (tree-node 10)))))))
     ;; instance?
-    (prelude/assert (tree/instance? tree-a))
-    (prelude/assert (tree/instance? tree-b))
-    (prelude/refute (tree/instance? '(1 2 3)))
-    (prelude/refute (tree/instance? "oak"))
+    (prelude/assert (tree-instance? tree-a))
+    (prelude/assert (tree-instance? tree-b))
+    (prelude/refute (tree-instance? '(1 2 3)))
+    (prelude/refute (tree-instance? "oak"))
     ;; balanced?
-    (prelude/assert (tree/balanced? 1 tree-a))
-    (prelude/refute (tree/balanced? 1 tree-b))
+    (prelude/assert (tree-balanced? 1 tree-a))
+    (prelude/refute (tree-balanced? 1 tree-b))
     (message "Tests pass!")))
 
 (provide 'tree)