diff options
author | Abseil Team <absl-team@google.com> | 2017-10-30T14·44-0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | misterg <misterg@google.com> | 2017-10-30T19·04-0400 |
commit | c8bd28c58ba962abfe1b23633cae649099815a56 (patch) | |
tree | fcd29fd162291b36cf96f8fde9a16e3e7ca9084f /absl/base | |
parent | 0fece732a21c5ae8fef5fa8b3f0b8487bca68d83 (diff) |
Changes imported from Abseil "staging" branch:
- 0726b35bb91aa98b87b340db9019fe7bdb19fe52 Fixing typo when checking CUDA compiler version, and use ... by Abseil Team <absl-team@google.com> - 3c94139e0e2ca6387c0498f24c9e44172208fffc Update comment of GUARDED_BY to match feedback provided b... by Abseil Team <absl-team@google.com> - 116d0427b845613213e26afc1203621ac7bd6910 Turn off ABSL TLS support for buggy versions of the Andro... by Abseil Team <absl-team@google.com> GitOrigin-RevId: 0726b35bb91aa98b87b340db9019fe7bdb19fe52 Change-Id: I861e4fb27d77904e705ccbcb4054f10c3f43e158
Diffstat (limited to 'absl/base')
-rw-r--r-- | absl/base/config.h | 55 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | absl/base/thread_annotations.h | 6 |
2 files changed, 35 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/absl/base/config.h b/absl/base/config.h index 495811bd88c3..8a44c06807f0 100644 --- a/absl/base/config.h +++ b/absl/base/config.h @@ -93,28 +93,6 @@ #define ABSL_HAVE_TLS 1 #endif -// There are platforms for which TLS should not be used even though the compiler -// makes it seem like it's supported (Android NDK < r12b for example). -// This is primarily because of linker problems and toolchain misconfiguration: -// Abseil does not intend to support this indefinitely. Currently, the newest -// toolchain that we intend to support that requires this behavior is the -// r11 NDK - allowing for a 5 year support window on that means this option -// is likely to be removed around June of 2021. -#if defined(__ANDROID__) && defined(__clang__) -#if __has_include(<android/ndk-version.h>) -#include <android/ndk-version.h> -#endif -// TLS isn't supported until NDK r12b per -// https://developer.android.com/ndk/downloads/revision_history.html -// Since NDK r16, `__NDK_MAJOR__` and `__NDK_MINOR__` are defined in -// <android/ndk-version.h>. For NDK < r16, users should define these macros, -// e.g. `-D__NDK_MAJOR__=11 -D__NKD_MINOR__=0` for NDK r11. -#if defined(__NDK_MAJOR__) && defined(__NDK_MINOR__) && \ - ((__NDK_MAJOR__ < 12) || ((__NDK_MAJOR__ == 12) && (__NDK_MINOR__ < 1))) -#undef ABSL_HAVE_TLS -#endif -#endif // defined(__ANDROID__) && defined(__clang__) - // ABSL_HAVE_STD_IS_TRIVIALLY_DESTRUCTIBLE // // Checks whether `std::is_trivially_destructible<T>` is supported. @@ -168,6 +146,30 @@ #define ABSL_HAVE_THREAD_LOCAL 1 #endif +// There are platforms for which TLS should not be used even though the compiler +// makes it seem like it's supported (Android NDK < r12b for example). +// This is primarily because of linker problems and toolchain misconfiguration: +// Abseil does not intend to support this indefinitely. Currently, the newest +// toolchain that we intend to support that requires this behavior is the +// r11 NDK - allowing for a 5 year support window on that means this option +// is likely to be removed around June of 2021. +// TLS isn't supported until NDK r12b per +// https://developer.android.com/ndk/downloads/revision_history.html +// Since NDK r16, `__NDK_MAJOR__` and `__NDK_MINOR__` are defined in +// <android/ndk-version.h>. For NDK < r16, users should define these macros, +// e.g. `-D__NDK_MAJOR__=11 -D__NKD_MINOR__=0` for NDK r11. +#if defined(__ANDROID__) && defined(__clang__) +#if __has_include(<android/ndk-version.h>) +#include <android/ndk-version.h> +#endif // __has_include(<android/ndk-version.h>) +#if defined(__ANDROID__) && defined(__clang__) && defined(__NDK_MAJOR__) && \ + defined(__NDK_MINOR__) && \ + ((__NDK_MAJOR__ < 12) || ((__NDK_MAJOR__ == 12) && (__NDK_MINOR__ < 1))) +#undef ABSL_HAVE_TLS +#undef ABSL_HAVE_THREAD_LOCAL +#endif +#endif // defined(__ANDROID__) && defined(__clang__) + // ABSL_HAVE_INTRINSIC_INT128 // // Checks whether the __int128 compiler extension for a 128-bit integral type is @@ -182,10 +184,17 @@ #elif (defined(__clang__) && defined(__SIZEOF_INT128__) && \ !defined(__aarch64__)) || \ (defined(__CUDACC__) && defined(__SIZEOF_INT128__) && \ - __CUDACC_VER__ >= 70000) || \ + __CUDACC_VER_MAJOR__ >= 9) || \ (!defined(__clang__) && !defined(__CUDACC__) && defined(__GNUC__) && \ defined(__SIZEOF_INT128__)) #define ABSL_HAVE_INTRINSIC_INT128 1 +// __CUDACC_VER__ is a full version number before CUDA 9, and is defined to a +// std::string explaining that it has been removed starting with CUDA 9. We can't +// compare both variants in a single boolean expression because there is no +// short-circuiting in the preprocessor. +#elif defined(__CUDACC__) && defined(__SIZEOF_INT128__) && \ + __CUDACC_VER__ >= 7000 +#define ABSL_HAVE_INTRINSIC_INT128 1 #endif // ABSL_HAVE_EXCEPTIONS diff --git a/absl/base/thread_annotations.h b/absl/base/thread_annotations.h index 025a8548d5d7..53816005588e 100644 --- a/absl/base/thread_annotations.h +++ b/absl/base/thread_annotations.h @@ -43,9 +43,9 @@ // GUARDED_BY() // -// Documents if a shared variable/field needs to be protected by a mutex. -// GUARDED_BY() allows the user to specify a particular mutex that should be -// held when accessing the annotated variable. +// Documents if a shared field or global variable needs to be protected by a +// mutex. GUARDED_BY() allows the user to specify a particular mutex that +// should be held when accessing the annotated variable. // // Example: // |