tvix-store API

This document outlines the design of the API exposed by tvix-store, as well as other implementations of this store protocol.

The store API has four main consumers:

The evaluator (or more correctly, the CLI/coordinator, in the Tvix case) communicates with the store to:
- Upload files and directories (e.g. from builtins.path, or src = ./path Nix expressions).
- Read files from the store where necessary (e.g. when nixpkgs is located in the store, or for IFD).
The builder communicates with the store to:
- Upload files and directories after a build, to persist build artifacts in the store.
Tvix clients (such as users that have Tvix installed, or, depending on perspective, builder environments) expect the store to "materialise" on disk to provide a directory layout with store paths.
Stores may communicate with other stores, to substitute already built store paths, i.e. a store acts as a binary cache for other stores.

The store API attempts to reuse parts of its API between these three consumers by making similarities explicit in the protocol. This leads to a protocol that is slightly more complex than a simple "file upload/download"-system, but at significantly greater efficiency, both in terms of deduplication opportunities as well as granularity.

The Store model

Contents inside a tvix-store can be grouped into three different message types:

Blobs
Directories
PathInfo (see further down)

(check castore.md for more detailled field descriptions)

Blobs

A blob object contains the literal file contents of regular (or executable) files.

Content-addressed Store Model

For example, lets consider a directory layout like this, with some imaginary hashes of file contents:

.
├── file-1.txt        hash: 5891b5b522d5df086d0ff0b110fb
└── nested
    └── file-2.txt    hash: abc6fd595fc079d3114d4b71a4d8

A hash for the directory nested can be created by creating the Directory object:

{
  "directories": [],
  "files": [{
    "name": "file-2.txt",
    "digest": "abc6fd595fc079d3114d4b71a4d8",
    "size": 123,
  }],
  "symlink": [],
}

And then hashing a serialised form of that data structure. We use the blake3 hash of the canonical protobuf representation. Let's assume the hash was ff0029485729bcde993720749232.

To create the directory object one layer up, we now refer to our nested directory object in directories, and to file-1.txt in files:

{
  "directories": [{
    "name": "nested",
    "digest": "ff0029485729bcde993720749232",
    "size": 1,
  }],
  "files": [{
    "name": "file-1.txt",
    "digest": "5891b5b522d5df086d0ff0b110fb",
    "size": 124,
  }]
}

This Merkle DAG of Directory objects, and flat store of blobs can be used to describe any file/directory/symlink inside a store path. Due to its content- addressed nature, it'll automatically deduplicate (re-)used (sub)directories, and allow substitution from any (untrusted) source.

The thing that's now only missing is the metadata to map/"mounting" from the content-addressed world to a physical path.

PathInfo

As most paths in the Nix store currently are input-addressed ¹, we need something mapping from an input-addressed "output path hash" to the contents in the content- addressed world.

That's what PathInfo provides. It embeds the root node (Directory, File or Symlink) at a given store path.

The root nodes' name field is populated with the (base)name inside /nix/store, so xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-pname-1.2.3.

The PathInfo message also stores references to other store paths, and some more NARInfo-specific metadata (signatures, narhash, narsize).

API overview

There's three different services:

BlobService

BlobService can be used to store and retrieve blobs of data, used to host regular file contents.

It is content-addressed, using blake3 as a hashing function.

As blake3 is a tree hash, there's an opportunity to do verified streaming of parts of the file, which doesn't need to trust any more information than the root hash itself. Future extensions of the BlobService protocol will enable this.

DirectoryService

DirectoryService allows lookups (and uploads) of Directory messages, and whole reference graphs of them.

PathInfoService

The PathInfo service provides lookups from an output path hash to a PathInfo message.

Example flows

Below there are some common usecases of tvix-store, and how the different services are used.

Upload files and directories

This needed for builtins.path or src = ./path in Nix expressions (A), as well as for uploading build artifacts to a store (B).

The path specified needs to be (recursively, BFS-style) traversed.

All file contents need to be hashed with blake3, and submitted to the BlobService if not already present. A reference to them needs to be added to the parent Directory object that's constructed.
All symlinks need to be added to the parent directory they reside in.
Whenever a Directory has been fully traversed, it needs to be uploaded to the DirectoryService and a reference to it needs to be added to the parent Directory object.

Most of the hashing / directory traversal/uploading can happen in parallel, as long as Directory objects only refer to Directory objects and Blobs that have already been uploaded.

When reaching the root, a PathInfo object needs to be constructed.

In the case of content-addressed paths (A), the name of the root node is based on the NAR representation of the contents. It might make sense to be able to offload the NAR calculation to the store, which can cache it.
In the case of build artifacts (B), the output path is input-addressed and known upfront.

Contrary to Nix, this has the advantage of not having to upload a lot of things to the store that didn't change.

Reading files from the store from the evaluator

This is the case when nixpkgs is located in the store, or IFD in general.

The store client asks the PathInfoService for the PathInfo of the output path in the request, and looks at the root node.

If something other than the root path is requested, the root_node Directory is inspected and potentially a chain of Directory objects requested from DirectoryService. ²

When the desired file is reached, the BlobService can be used to read the contents of this file, and return it back to the evaluator.

FUTUREWORK: define how importing from symlinks should/does work.

Contrary to Nix, this has the advantage of not having to copy all of the contents of a store path to the evaluating machine, but really only fetching the files the evaluator currently cares about.

Materializing store paths on disk

This is useful for people running a Tvix-only system, or running builds on a "Tvix remote builder" in its own mount namespace.

In a system with Nix installed, we can't simply manually "extract" things to /nix/store, as Nix assumes to own all writes to this location. In these usecases, we're probably better off exposing a tvix-store as a local binary cache (that's what nar-bridge does).

Assuming we are in an environment where we control /nix/store exclusively, a "realize to disk" would either "extract" things from the tvix-store to a filesystem, or expose a FUSE filesystem. The latter would be particularly interesting for remote build workloads, as build inputs can be realized on- demand, which saves copying around a lot of never-accessed files.

In both cases, the API interactions are similar.

The PathInfoService is asked for the PathInfo of the requested store path.
If everything should be "extracted", the DirectoryService is asked for all Directory objects in the closure, the file structure is created, all Blobs are downloaded and placed in their corresponding location and all symlinks are created accordingly.
If this is a FUSE filesystem, we can decide to only request a subset, similar to the "Reading files from the store from the evaluator" usecase, even though it might make sense to keep all Directory objects around. (See the caveat in "Trust model" though!)

Stores communicating with other stores

The gRPC API exposed by the tvix-store allows composing multiple stores, and implementing some caching strategies, that store clients don't need to be aware of.

For example, a caching strategy could have a fast local tvix-store, that's asked first and filled with data from a slower remote tvix-store.
Multiple stores could be asked for the same data, and whatever store returns the right data first wins.

Trust model / Distribution

As already described above, the only non-content-addressed service is the PathInfo service.

This means, all other messages (such as Blob and Directory messages) can be substituted from many different, untrusted sources/mirrors, which will make plugging in additional substitution strategies like IPFS, local network neighbors super simple.

As for PathInfo, we don't specify an additional signature mechanism yet, but carry the NAR-based signatures from Nix along.

This means, if we don't trust a remote PathInfo object, we currently need to "stream" the NAR representation to validate these signatures.

However, the slow part is downloading of NAR files, and considering we have more granularity available, we might only need to download some small blobs, rather than a whole NAR file.

A future signature mechanism, that is only signing (parts of) the PathInfo message, which only points to content-addressed data will enable verified partial access into a store path, opening up opportunities for lazy filesystem access, which is very useful in remote builder scenarios.

Nix hashes the A-Term representation of a .drv, after doing some replacements on refered Input Derivations to calculate output paths. ↩
This would expose an N+1 query problem. However it's not a problem in practice, as there's usually always a "local" caching store in the loop, and DirectoryService supports a recursive lookup for all Directory children of a Directory ↩