From 487e936f3e9d739d300eb31855c9231f8768205b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vincent Ambo <vincent@kivra.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:02:01 +0100
Subject: Add slides for criticism & adoption

---
 slides.tex | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

(limited to 'slides.tex')

diff --git a/slides.tex b/slides.tex
index 4d5447b6e54d..e18c9496cc61 100644
--- a/slides.tex
+++ b/slides.tex
@@ -127,6 +127,34 @@
 
 \section{Controversies}
 
+\begin{frame}{Systemd criticism}
+  Systemd has been heavily criticised, usually focusing around a few points:
+  \begin{itemize}
+  \item Feature-creep: Systemd absorbs more and more other services
+  \end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{Systemd criticism}
+  \includegraphics[keepaspectratio=true,width=\textwidth]{systemdcomponents.png}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{Systemd criticism}
+  Systemd has been heavily criticised, usually focusing around a few points:
+  \begin{itemize}
+  \item Feature-creep: Systemd absorbs more and more other services
+  \item Opaque: systemd's inner workings are harder to understand than old \texttt{init}
+  \item Unstable: development is quick and breakage happens
+  \end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{Systemd adoption}
+  Systemd was initially adopted by RedHat (and related distributions).
+
+  It spread quickly to others, for example ArchLinux.
+
+  Debian and Ubuntu were the last major players who decided to adopt it, but not without drama.
+\end{frame}
+
 \section{Questions?}
 
 \end{document}
-- 
cgit 1.4.1

