From 4911a10a4e51102a21a5d123a852c75d2ec92dbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eelco Dolstra Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:26:31 -0400 Subject: Use XZ compression in binary caches XZ compresses significantly better than bzip2. Here are the compression ratios and execution times (using 4 cores in parallel) on my /var/run/current-system (3.1 GiB): bzip2: total compressed size 849.56 MiB, 30.8% [2m08] xz -6: total compressed size 641.84 MiB, 23.4% [6m53] xz -7: total compressed size 621.82 MiB, 22.6% [7m19] xz -8: total compressed size 599.33 MiB, 21.8% [7m18] xz -9: total compressed size 588.18 MiB, 21.4% [7m40] Note that compression takes much longer. More importantly, however, decompression is much faster: bzip2: 1m47.274s xz -6: 0m55.446s xz -7: 0m54.119s xz -8: 0m52.388s xz -9: 0m51.842s The only downside to using -9 is that decompression takes a fair amount (~65 MB) of memory. --- corepkgs/config.nix.in | 3 ++- corepkgs/nar.nix | 9 +++++---- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'corepkgs') diff --git a/corepkgs/config.nix.in b/corepkgs/config.nix.in index b324d732a1..1be4bd0904 100644 --- a/corepkgs/config.nix.in +++ b/corepkgs/config.nix.in @@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ in { perl = "@perl@"; shell = "@shell@"; coreutils = "@coreutils@"; - bzip2 = fromEnv "NIX_BZIP2" "@bzip2@"; + bzip2 = "@bzip2@"; + xz = "@xz@"; tar = "@tar@"; tr = "@tr@"; nixBinDir = fromEnv "NIX_BIN_DIR" "@bindir@"; diff --git a/corepkgs/nar.nix b/corepkgs/nar.nix index 4747dc31de..c5155dcc91 100644 --- a/corepkgs/nar.nix +++ b/corepkgs/nar.nix @@ -8,14 +8,15 @@ let echo "packing ‘$storePath’..." mkdir $out - dst=$out/tmp.nar.bz2 + dst=$out/tmp.nar.xz set -o pipefail - nix-store --dump "$storePath" | ${bzip2} > $dst + nix-store --dump "$storePath" | ${xz} -9 > $dst - nix-hash --flat --type $hashAlgo --base32 $dst > $out/narbz2-hash + hash=$(nix-hash --flat --type $hashAlgo --base32 $dst) + echo -n $hash > $out/nar-compressed-hash - mv $out/tmp.nar.bz2 $out/$(cat $out/narbz2-hash).nar.bz2 + mv $dst $out/$hash.nar.xz ''; in -- cgit 1.4.1