From 4911a10a4e51102a21a5d123a852c75d2ec92dbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eelco Dolstra Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:26:31 -0400 Subject: Use XZ compression in binary caches XZ compresses significantly better than bzip2. Here are the compression ratios and execution times (using 4 cores in parallel) on my /var/run/current-system (3.1 GiB): bzip2: total compressed size 849.56 MiB, 30.8% [2m08] xz -6: total compressed size 641.84 MiB, 23.4% [6m53] xz -7: total compressed size 621.82 MiB, 22.6% [7m19] xz -8: total compressed size 599.33 MiB, 21.8% [7m18] xz -9: total compressed size 588.18 MiB, 21.4% [7m40] Note that compression takes much longer. More importantly, however, decompression is much faster: bzip2: 1m47.274s xz -6: 0m55.446s xz -7: 0m54.119s xz -8: 0m52.388s xz -9: 0m51.842s The only downside to using -9 is that decompression takes a fair amount (~65 MB) of memory. --- corepkgs/config.nix.in | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'corepkgs/config.nix.in') diff --git a/corepkgs/config.nix.in b/corepkgs/config.nix.in index b324d732a1a2..1be4bd0904ba 100644 --- a/corepkgs/config.nix.in +++ b/corepkgs/config.nix.in @@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ in { perl = "@perl@"; shell = "@shell@"; coreutils = "@coreutils@"; - bzip2 = fromEnv "NIX_BZIP2" "@bzip2@"; + bzip2 = "@bzip2@"; + xz = "@xz@"; tar = "@tar@"; tr = "@tr@"; nixBinDir = fromEnv "NIX_BIN_DIR" "@bindir@"; -- cgit 1.4.1