From cc411ec60a529fb32e1adaa9c250e30bea53a58b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: William Carroll Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 22:30:50 -0800 Subject: chore(wpcarro/emacs): Delete tree.el Not using, so let's garbage-collect. Change-Id: I6c508a04fd77099f0e23c5b4a20c7cffa7492b21 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7397 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: wpcarro --- users/wpcarro/emacs/.emacs.d/wpc/tree.el | 199 ------------------------------- 1 file changed, 199 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 users/wpcarro/emacs/.emacs.d/wpc/tree.el diff --git a/users/wpcarro/emacs/.emacs.d/wpc/tree.el b/users/wpcarro/emacs/.emacs.d/wpc/tree.el deleted file mode 100644 index 332e6c8d25..0000000000 --- a/users/wpcarro/emacs/.emacs.d/wpc/tree.el +++ /dev/null @@ -1,199 +0,0 @@ -;;; tree.el --- Working with Trees -*- lexical-binding: t -*- - -;; Author: William Carroll -;; Version: 0.0.1 -;; Package-Requires: ((emacs "25.1")) - -;;; Commentary: -;; Some friendly functions that hopefully will make working with trees cheaper -;; and therefore more appealing! -;; -;; Tree terminology: -;; - leaf: node with zero children. -;; - root: node with zero parents. -;; - depth: measures a node's distance from the root node. This implies the -;; root node has a depth of zero. -;; - height: measures the longest traversal from a node to a leaf. This implies -;; that a leaf node has a height of zero. -;; - balanced? -;; -;; Tree variants: -;; - binary: the maximum number of children is two. -;; - binary search: the maximum number of children is two and left sub-trees are -;; lower in value than right sub-trees. -;; - rose: the number of children is variable. - -;;; Code: - -;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; -;; Dependencies -;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; - -(require 'prelude) -(require 'list) -(require 'set) -(require 'tuple) -(require 'series) -(require 'random) -(require 'maybe) -(require 'cl-lib) - -;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; -;; Library -;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; - -(cl-defstruct tree xs) - -(cl-defstruct node value children) - -(cl-defun tree-node (value &optional children) - "Create a node struct of VALUE with CHILDREN." - (make-node :value value - :children children)) - -(defun tree-reduce-breadth (acc f xs) - "Reduce over XS breadth-first applying F to each x and ACC (in that order). -Breadth-first traversals guarantee to find the shortest path in a graph. - They're typically more difficult to implement than DFTs and may also incur - higher memory costs on average than their depth-first counterparts.") - -;; TODO: Support :order as 'pre | 'in | 'post. -;; TODO: Troubleshoot why I need defensive (nil? node) check. -(defun tree-reduce-depth (acc f node) - "Reduce over NODE depth-first applying F to each NODE and ACC. -F is called with each NODE, ACC, and the current depth. -Depth-first traversals have the advantage of typically consuming less memory - than their breadth-first equivalents would have. They're also typically - easier to implement using recursion. This comes at the cost of not - guaranteeing to be able to find the shortest path in a graph." - (cl-labels ((do-reduce-depth - (acc f node depth) - (let ((acc-new (funcall f node acc depth))) - (if (or (maybe-nil? node) - (tree-leaf? node)) - acc-new - (list-reduce - acc-new - (lambda (node acc) - (tree-do-reduce-depth - acc - f - node - (number-inc depth))) - (node-children node)))))) - (do-reduce-depth acc f node 0))) - -;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; -;; Helpers -;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; - -(defun tree-height (xs) - "Return the height of tree XS.") - -;; TODO: Troubleshoot why need for (nil? node). Similar misgiving -;; above. -(defun tree-leaf-depths (xs) - "Return a list of all of the depths of the leaf nodes in XS." - (list-reverse - (tree-reduce-depth - '() - (lambda (node acc depth) - (if (or (maybe-nil? node) - (tree-leaf? node)) - (list-cons depth acc) - acc)) - xs))) - -;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; -;; Generators -;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; - -;; TODO: Consider parameterizing height, forced min-max branching, random -;; distributions, etc. - -;; TODO: Bail out before stack overflowing by consider branching, current-depth. - -(cl-defun tree-random (&optional (value-fn (lambda (_) nil)) - (branching-factor 2)) - "Randomly generate a tree with BRANCHING-FACTOR. - -This uses VALUE-FN to compute the node values. VALUE-FN is called with the -current-depth of the node. Useful for generating test data. Warning this -function can overflow the stack." - (cl-labels ((do-random - (d vf bf) - (make-node - :value (funcall vf d) - :children (->> (series/range 0 (number-dec bf)) - (list-map - (lambda (_) - (when (random-boolean?) - (do-random d vf bf)))))))) - (do-random 0 value-fn branching-factor))) - -;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; -;; Predicates -;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; - -(defun tree-instance? (tree) - "Return t if TREE is a tree struct." - (node-p tree)) - -(defun tree-leaf? (node) - "Return t if NODE has no children." - (maybe-nil? (node-children node))) - -(defun tree-balanced? (n xs) - "Return t if the tree, XS, is balanced. -A tree is balanced if none of the differences between any two depths of two leaf - nodes in XS is greater than N." - (> n (->> xs - tree-leaf-depths - set-from-list - set-count - number-dec))) - -;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; -;; Tests -;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; - -(defconst tree-enable-testing? t - "When t, test suite runs.") - -;; TODO: Create set of macros for a proper test suite including: -;; - describe (arbitrarily nestable) -;; - it (arbitrarily nestable) -;; - line numbers for errors -;; - accumulated output for synopsis -;; - do we want describe *and* it? Why not a generic label that works for both? -(when tree-enable-testing? - (let ((tree-a (tree-node 1 - (list (tree-node 2 - (list (tree-node 5) - (tree-node 6))) - (tree-node 3 - (list (tree-node 7) - (tree-node 8))) - (tree-node 4 - (list (tree-node 9) - (tree-node 10)))))) - (tree-b (tree-node 1 - (list (tree-node 2 - (list (tree-node 5) - (tree-node 6))) - (tree-node 3) - (tree-node 4 - (list (tree-node 9) - (tree-node 10))))))) - ;; instance? - (prelude-assert (tree-instance? tree-a)) - (prelude-assert (tree-instance? tree-b)) - (prelude-refute (tree-instance? '(1 2 3))) - (prelude-refute (tree-instance? "oak")) - ;; balanced? - (prelude-assert (tree-balanced? 1 tree-a)) - (prelude-refute (tree-balanced? 1 tree-b)) - (message "Tests pass!"))) - -(provide 'tree) -;;; tree.el ends here -- cgit 1.4.1