| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Make constructing of a new Evaluation use the builder pattern rather
than setting public mutable fields. This is currently a pure
refactor (no functionality has changed) but has a few advantages:
- We've encapsulated the internals of the fields in Evaluation, meaning
we can change them without too much breakage of clients
- We have type safety that prevents us from ever changing the fields of
an Evaluation after it's built (which matters more in a world where we
reuse Evaluations).
More importantly, this paves the road for doing different things with
the construction of an Evaluation - notably, sharing certain things like
the GlobalsMap across subsequent evaluations in eg the REPL.
Fixes: b/262
Change-Id: I4a27116faac14cdd144fc7c992d14ae095a1aca4
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/11956
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: aspen <root@gws.fyi>
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
|
|
`Evaluation::new_impure()` would require the test to be impure, but
there's nothing in this test specifically requiring us to make use of
impure features.
Change-Id: Idb24981195d1a94f51053ae04403eb5f0e27f3d9
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/11725
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: Connor Brewster <cbrewster@hey.com>
|
|
Have a Evaluation::new() function that's used to set up the Evaluation
struct initially - which is also used by both new_pure and new_impure
internally.
It's generic over the exact type of IO, making it easier to instantiate
Evaluation with non-tvix-eval EvalIO implementations, that might not be
in a Box.
Change-Id: Ibf728da24aca59639c5b6df58d00ae98c99a63f5
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/10640
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
Instead, it's passed in the evaluate/compile_only functions, which feels
more naturally. It lets us set up the Evaluation struct long before
we actually feed it with data to evaluate.
Now that Evaluation::new() would be accepting an empty list of
arguments, we can simply implement Default, making things a bit more
idiomatic.
Change-Id: I4369658634909a0c504fdffa18242a130daa0239
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/10475
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
|
|
This branch was missing, and an assumption elsewhere just executed the
returned (broken) bytecode.
This fixes b/253.
Change-Id: I015023ba921bc08ea03882167f1f560feca25e50
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8090
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
|
|
This fixes a very complicated bug (b/246). Evaluation
progresses *much* further after this, leading to several less
complicated bugs likely being uncovered by this
What was the problem?
=====================
Previously, when evaluating a thunk, we had a code path that looked
like this:
match *thunk {
ThunkRepr::Evaluated(Value::Thunk(ref inner_thunk)) => {
let inner_repr = inner_thunk.0.borrow().clone();
drop(thunk);
self.0.replace(inner_repr);
}
/* ... */
}
This code path created a copy of the inner `ThunkRepr` of a nested
thunk, and moved that copy into the `ThunkRepr` of the parent.
The effect of this was that the original `ThunkRepr` (unforced!) lived
on in the original thunk, without the memoization of the subsequent
forcing applying to it.
This had the result that Tvix would repeatedly evaluate these thunks
without ever memoizing them, if they occured repeatedly as shared
inner thunks. Most notably, this would *always* occur when
builtins.import was used.
What's the solution?
====================
I have completely rewritten `Thunk::force_trampoline_self` to make all
flows that can occur in it explicit. I have also removed the outer
loop inside of that function, and resorted to more use of trampolining
instead.
The function is now well-commented and it should be possible to read
it from top-to-bottom and get a general sense of what is going on,
though the trampolining itself (which is implemented in the VM) needs
to be at least partially understood for this.
What's the new problem(s)?
==========================
One new (known) problem is that we have to construct `Error` instances
in all error types here, but we do not have spans available in some
thunk-related situations. Due to b/238 we cannot ask the VM for an
arbitrary span from the callsite leading to the force. This means that
there are now code paths where, under certain conditions, causing an
evaluation error during thunk forcing will panic.
To fix this we will need to investigate and fix b/238, and/or add a
span tracking mechanism to thunks themselves.
What other impacts does this have?
==================================
With this commit, eval of nixpkgs mostly succeeds (things like stdenv
evaluate to the same hashes for us and C++ Nix, meaning we now
construct identical derivations without eval breaking).
Due to this we progress much further into nixpkgs, which lets us
uncover more additional bugs. For example, after this commit we can
quickly see that cl/7949 introduces some kind of behavioural issue and
should not be merged as-is (this was not apparent before).
Additionally, tvix-eval is now seemingly very fast. When doing
performance analysis of a nixpkgs eval, we now mostly see the code
path for shelling out to C++ Nix to add things to the store in there.
We still need those code paths, so we can not (yet) do a performance
analysis beyond that.
Change-Id: I738525bad8bc5ede5d8c737f023b14b8f4160612
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8012
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
|
|
This makes it possible to inject builtins into the builtin set that
are written in Nix code, and which at runtime are represented by a
thunk that will compile them the first time they are used.
Change-Id: Ia632367328f66fb2f26cb64ae464f8f3dc9c6d30
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7891
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
|
