| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This is slightly better than the (mostly untested) mess we had before:
Just implement the one thing we need using the tools the one
implementation we support (SBCL) gives us.
Eventually, we'll want to make this portable, probably using osicat.
Unfortunately, packaging this requires support for cffi-grovel (b/383)
which buildLisp lacks at the moment.
Change-Id: I6960015f80e6a5dfde67baf55537c5274a19e4e2
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/11356
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
|
Seems simple enough to use standard LET and a few parentheses more which
stock emacs can indent probably.
Change-Id: I0137a532186194f62f3a36f9bf05630af1afcdae
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8584
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
|
|
SCLF is quite a big utility library (almost 3€ LOC) with limited
portability (CMUCL, SBCL and CLISP to an extent). Continuing to maintain
it is an unnecessary burden, as depot only uses a fraction of it which
is now inlined into the respective users (mime4cl and mblog).
In the future trimming down ex-sclf.lisp may make sense either by
refactoring the code that uses it or by moving interesting utilities
into e.g. klatre.
Change-Id: I2e73825b6bfa372e97847f25c30731a5aad4a1b5
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/5922
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
|
