about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/third_party/git/Documentation/git-merge.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'third_party/git/Documentation/git-merge.txt')
-rw-r--r--third_party/git/Documentation/git-merge.txt372
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 372 deletions
diff --git a/third_party/git/Documentation/git-merge.txt b/third_party/git/Documentation/git-merge.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 01fd52dc70..0000000000
--- a/third_party/git/Documentation/git-merge.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,372 +0,0 @@
-git-merge(1)
-============
-
-NAME
-----
-git-merge - Join two or more development histories together
-
-
-SYNOPSIS
---------
-[verse]
-'git merge' [-n] [--stat] [--no-commit] [--squash] [--[no-]edit]
-	[-s <strategy>] [-X <strategy-option>] [-S[<keyid>]]
-	[--[no-]allow-unrelated-histories]
-	[--[no-]rerere-autoupdate] [-m <msg>] [-F <file>] [<commit>...]
-'git merge' (--continue | --abort | --quit)
-
-DESCRIPTION
------------
-Incorporates changes from the named commits (since the time their
-histories diverged from the current branch) into the current
-branch.  This command is used by 'git pull' to incorporate changes
-from another repository and can be used by hand to merge changes
-from one branch into another.
-
-Assume the following history exists and the current branch is
-"`master`":
-
-------------
-	  A---B---C topic
-	 /
-    D---E---F---G master
-------------
-
-Then "`git merge topic`" will replay the changes made on the
-`topic` branch since it diverged from `master` (i.e., `E`) until
-its current commit (`C`) on top of `master`, and record the result
-in a new commit along with the names of the two parent commits and
-a log message from the user describing the changes.
-
-------------
-	  A---B---C topic
-	 /         \
-    D---E---F---G---H master
-------------
-
-The second syntax ("`git merge --abort`") can only be run after the
-merge has resulted in conflicts. 'git merge --abort' will abort the
-merge process and try to reconstruct the pre-merge state. However,
-if there were uncommitted changes when the merge started (and
-especially if those changes were further modified after the merge
-was started), 'git merge --abort' will in some cases be unable to
-reconstruct the original (pre-merge) changes. Therefore:
-
-*Warning*: Running 'git merge' with non-trivial uncommitted changes is
-discouraged: while possible, it may leave you in a state that is hard to
-back out of in the case of a conflict.
-
-The third syntax ("`git merge --continue`") can only be run after the
-merge has resulted in conflicts.
-
-OPTIONS
--------
-include::merge-options.txt[]
-
--m <msg>::
-	Set the commit message to be used for the merge commit (in
-	case one is created).
-+
-If `--log` is specified, a shortlog of the commits being merged
-will be appended to the specified message.
-+
-The 'git fmt-merge-msg' command can be
-used to give a good default for automated 'git merge'
-invocations. The automated message can include the branch description.
-
--F <file>::
---file=<file>::
-	Read the commit message to be used for the merge commit (in
-	case one is created).
-+
-If `--log` is specified, a shortlog of the commits being merged
-will be appended to the specified message.
-
---rerere-autoupdate::
---no-rerere-autoupdate::
-	Allow the rerere mechanism to update the index with the
-	result of auto-conflict resolution if possible.
-
---overwrite-ignore::
---no-overwrite-ignore::
-	Silently overwrite ignored files from the merge result. This
-	is the default behavior. Use `--no-overwrite-ignore` to abort.
-
---abort::
-	Abort the current conflict resolution process, and
-	try to reconstruct the pre-merge state.
-+
-If there were uncommitted worktree changes present when the merge
-started, 'git merge --abort' will in some cases be unable to
-reconstruct these changes. It is therefore recommended to always
-commit or stash your changes before running 'git merge'.
-+
-'git merge --abort' is equivalent to 'git reset --merge' when
-`MERGE_HEAD` is present.
-
---quit::
-	Forget about the current merge in progress. Leave the index
-	and the working tree as-is.
-
---continue::
-	After a 'git merge' stops due to conflicts you can conclude the
-	merge by running 'git merge --continue' (see "HOW TO RESOLVE
-	CONFLICTS" section below).
-
-<commit>...::
-	Commits, usually other branch heads, to merge into our branch.
-	Specifying more than one commit will create a merge with
-	more than two parents (affectionately called an Octopus merge).
-+
-If no commit is given from the command line, merge the remote-tracking
-branches that the current branch is configured to use as its upstream.
-See also the configuration section of this manual page.
-+
-When `FETCH_HEAD` (and no other commit) is specified, the branches
-recorded in the `.git/FETCH_HEAD` file by the previous invocation
-of `git fetch` for merging are merged to the current branch.
-
-
-PRE-MERGE CHECKS
-----------------
-
-Before applying outside changes, you should get your own work in
-good shape and committed locally, so it will not be clobbered if
-there are conflicts.  See also linkgit:git-stash[1].
-'git pull' and 'git merge' will stop without doing anything when
-local uncommitted changes overlap with files that 'git pull'/'git
-merge' may need to update.
-
-To avoid recording unrelated changes in the merge commit,
-'git pull' and 'git merge' will also abort if there are any changes
-registered in the index relative to the `HEAD` commit.  (Special
-narrow exceptions to this rule may exist depending on which merge
-strategy is in use, but generally, the index must match HEAD.)
-
-If all named commits are already ancestors of `HEAD`, 'git merge'
-will exit early with the message "Already up to date."
-
-FAST-FORWARD MERGE
-------------------
-
-Often the current branch head is an ancestor of the named commit.
-This is the most common case especially when invoked from 'git
-pull': you are tracking an upstream repository, you have committed
-no local changes, and now you want to update to a newer upstream
-revision.  In this case, a new commit is not needed to store the
-combined history; instead, the `HEAD` (along with the index) is
-updated to point at the named commit, without creating an extra
-merge commit.
-
-This behavior can be suppressed with the `--no-ff` option.
-
-TRUE MERGE
-----------
-
-Except in a fast-forward merge (see above), the branches to be
-merged must be tied together by a merge commit that has both of them
-as its parents.
-
-A merged version reconciling the changes from all branches to be
-merged is committed, and your `HEAD`, index, and working tree are
-updated to it.  It is possible to have modifications in the working
-tree as long as they do not overlap; the update will preserve them.
-
-When it is not obvious how to reconcile the changes, the following
-happens:
-
-1. The `HEAD` pointer stays the same.
-2. The `MERGE_HEAD` ref is set to point to the other branch head.
-3. Paths that merged cleanly are updated both in the index file and
-   in your working tree.
-4. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three
-   versions: stage 1 stores the version from the common ancestor,
-   stage 2 from `HEAD`, and stage 3 from `MERGE_HEAD` (you
-   can inspect the stages with `git ls-files -u`).  The working
-   tree files contain the result of the "merge" program; i.e. 3-way
-   merge results with familiar conflict markers `<<<` `===` `>>>`.
-5. No other changes are made.  In particular, the local
-   modifications you had before you started merge will stay the
-   same and the index entries for them stay as they were,
-   i.e. matching `HEAD`.
-
-If you tried a merge which resulted in complex conflicts and
-want to start over, you can recover with `git merge --abort`.
-
-MERGING TAG
------------
-
-When merging an annotated (and possibly signed) tag, Git always
-creates a merge commit even if a fast-forward merge is possible, and
-the commit message template is prepared with the tag message.
-Additionally, if the tag is signed, the signature check is reported
-as a comment in the message template. See also linkgit:git-tag[1].
-
-When you want to just integrate with the work leading to the commit
-that happens to be tagged, e.g. synchronizing with an upstream
-release point, you may not want to make an unnecessary merge commit.
-
-In such a case, you can "unwrap" the tag yourself before feeding it
-to `git merge`, or pass `--ff-only` when you do not have any work on
-your own. e.g.
-
-----
-git fetch origin
-git merge v1.2.3^0
-git merge --ff-only v1.2.3
-----
-
-
-HOW CONFLICTS ARE PRESENTED
----------------------------
-
-During a merge, the working tree files are updated to reflect the result
-of the merge.  Among the changes made to the common ancestor's version,
-non-overlapping ones (that is, you changed an area of the file while the
-other side left that area intact, or vice versa) are incorporated in the
-final result verbatim.  When both sides made changes to the same area,
-however, Git cannot randomly pick one side over the other, and asks you to
-resolve it by leaving what both sides did to that area.
-
-By default, Git uses the same style as the one used by the "merge" program
-from the RCS suite to present such a conflicted hunk, like this:
-
-------------
-Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
-ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
-<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
-Conflict resolution is hard;
-let's go shopping.
-=======
-Git makes conflict resolution easy.
->>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
-And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
-------------
-
-The area where a pair of conflicting changes happened is marked with markers
-`<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>`.  The part before the `=======`
-is typically your side, and the part afterwards is typically their side.
-
-The default format does not show what the original said in the conflicting
-area.  You cannot tell how many lines are deleted and replaced with
-Barbie's remark on your side.  The only thing you can tell is that your
-side wants to say it is hard and you'd prefer to go shopping, while the
-other side wants to claim it is easy.
-
-An alternative style can be used by setting the "merge.conflictStyle"
-configuration variable to "diff3".  In "diff3" style, the above conflict
-may look like this:
-
-------------
-Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
-ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
-<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
-Conflict resolution is hard;
-let's go shopping.
-|||||||
-Conflict resolution is hard.
-=======
-Git makes conflict resolution easy.
->>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
-And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
-------------
-
-In addition to the `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>` markers, it uses
-another `|||||||` marker that is followed by the original text.  You can
-tell that the original just stated a fact, and your side simply gave in to
-that statement and gave up, while the other side tried to have a more
-positive attitude.  You can sometimes come up with a better resolution by
-viewing the original.
-
-
-HOW TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS
-------------------------
-
-After seeing a conflict, you can do two things:
-
- * Decide not to merge.  The only clean-ups you need are to reset
-   the index file to the `HEAD` commit to reverse 2. and to clean
-   up working tree changes made by 2. and 3.; `git merge --abort`
-   can be used for this.
-
- * Resolve the conflicts.  Git will mark the conflicts in
-   the working tree.  Edit the files into shape and
-   'git add' them to the index.  Use 'git commit' or
-   'git merge --continue' to seal the deal. The latter command
-   checks whether there is a (interrupted) merge in progress
-   before calling 'git commit'.
-
-You can work through the conflict with a number of tools:
-
- * Use a mergetool.  `git mergetool` to launch a graphical
-   mergetool which will work you through the merge.
-
- * Look at the diffs.  `git diff` will show a three-way diff,
-   highlighting changes from both the `HEAD` and `MERGE_HEAD`
-   versions.
-
- * Look at the diffs from each branch. `git log --merge -p <path>`
-   will show diffs first for the `HEAD` version and then the
-   `MERGE_HEAD` version.
-
- * Look at the originals.  `git show :1:filename` shows the
-   common ancestor, `git show :2:filename` shows the `HEAD`
-   version, and `git show :3:filename` shows the `MERGE_HEAD`
-   version.
-
-
-EXAMPLES
---------
-
-* Merge branches `fixes` and `enhancements` on top of
-  the current branch, making an octopus merge:
-+
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git merge fixes enhancements
-------------------------------------------------
-
-* Merge branch `obsolete` into the current branch, using `ours`
-  merge strategy:
-+
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git merge -s ours obsolete
-------------------------------------------------
-
-* Merge branch `maint` into the current branch, but do not make
-  a new commit automatically:
-+
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git merge --no-commit maint
-------------------------------------------------
-+
-This can be used when you want to include further changes to the
-merge, or want to write your own merge commit message.
-+
-You should refrain from abusing this option to sneak substantial
-changes into a merge commit.  Small fixups like bumping
-release/version name would be acceptable.
-
-
-include::merge-strategies.txt[]
-
-CONFIGURATION
--------------
-include::config/merge.txt[]
-
-branch.<name>.mergeOptions::
-	Sets default options for merging into branch <name>. The syntax and
-	supported options are the same as those of 'git merge', but option
-	values containing whitespace characters are currently not supported.
-
-SEE ALSO
---------
-linkgit:git-fmt-merge-msg[1], linkgit:git-pull[1],
-linkgit:gitattributes[5],
-linkgit:git-reset[1],
-linkgit:git-diff[1], linkgit:git-ls-files[1],
-linkgit:git-add[1], linkgit:git-rm[1],
-linkgit:git-mergetool[1]
-
-GIT
----
-Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite