diff options
author | Abseil Team <absl-team@google.com> | 2019-02-19T22·29-0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jon Cohen <cohenjon@google.com> | 2019-02-20T23·02-0500 |
commit | 93d155bc4414f6c121bb1f19dba9fdb27c8943bc (patch) | |
tree | 47facabc0db6f4204fe5b7cdba5420276b00a1f0 /absl/utility/utility.h | |
parent | 426eaa4aa44e4580418bee46c1bd13911151bfb1 (diff) |
Export of internal Abseil changes.
-- 3d20ce6cd6541579abecaba169d4b8716d511272 by Jon Cohen <cohenjon@google.com>: Only use LSAN for clang version >= 3.5. This should fix https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/issues/244 PiperOrigin-RevId: 234675129 -- e15bd4ec7a81aa95cc3d09fa1e0e81d58ae478fb by Conrad Parker <conradparker@google.com>: Fix errors in apply() sample code The following changes are made: * Make the example method public. * Give the two user functions different names to avoid confusion about whether apply() can select the correct overload of a function based on its tuple argument (it can't). * Pass tuple2 to the second example apply() invocation, instead of passing its contents individually. * Fix a s/tuple/tuple3/ typo in the third example apply() invocation. PiperOrigin-RevId: 234223407 -- de0ed71e21bc76ddf9fe715fdbaef74cd0df95c7 by Abseil Team <absl-team@google.com>: First test if a macro is defined to avoid -Wundef. ABSL clients may need to compile their code with the -Wundef warning flag. It will be helpful if ABSL header files can be compiled without the -Wundef warning. How to avoid the -Wundef warning: If a macro may be undefined, we need to first test whether the macro is defined before testing its value. We can't rely on the C preprocessor rule that an undefined macro has the value 0L. PiperOrigin-RevId: 234201123 -- fa484ad7dae0cac21140a96662809ecb0ec8eb5d by Abseil Team <absl-team@google.com>: Internal change. PiperOrigin-RevId: 234185697 -- d69b1baef681e27954b065375ecf9c2320463b2b by Samuel Benzaquen <sbenza@google.com>: Mix pointers more thoroughly. Some pointer alignments interact badly with the mixing constant. By mixing twice we reduce this problem. PiperOrigin-RevId: 234178401 -- 1041d0e474610f3a8fea0db90958857327d6da1c by Samuel Benzaquen <sbenza@google.com>: Record rehashes in the hashtablez struct. Only recording the probe length on insertion causes a huge overestimation of the total probe length at any given time. With natural growth, elements are inserted when the load factor is between (max load/2, max load). However, after a rehash the majority of elements are actually inserted when the load factor is less than max/2 and have a much lower average probe length. Also reset some values when the table is cleared. PiperOrigin-RevId: 234013580 -- 299205caf3c89c47339f7409bc831746602cea84 by Mark Barolak <mbar@google.com>: Fix a sample code snippet that assumes `absl::string_view::const_iterator` is `const char*`. This is generally true, however in C++17 builds, absl::string_view is an alias for std::string_view and on MSVC, the std::string_view::const_iterator is an object instead of just a pointer. PiperOrigin-RevId: 233844595 -- af6c6370cf51a1e6c1469c79dfb2a486a4009136 by Abseil Team <absl-team@google.com>: Internal change. PiperOrigin-RevId: 233773470 -- 6e59e4b8e2bb6101b448f0f32b0bea81fe399ccf by Abseil Team <absl-team@google.com>: fix typo in {Starts|Ends}WithIgnoreCase comment in match.h PiperOrigin-RevId: 233662951 GitOrigin-RevId: 3d20ce6cd6541579abecaba169d4b8716d511272 Change-Id: Ib9a29b1c38c6aedf5d9f3f7f00596e8d30e864dd
Diffstat (limited to 'absl/utility/utility.h')
-rw-r--r-- | absl/utility/utility.h | 32 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/absl/utility/utility.h b/absl/utility/utility.h index aef4baa02dcd..104ec82939d6 100644 --- a/absl/utility/utility.h +++ b/absl/utility/utility.h @@ -234,25 +234,33 @@ auto apply_helper(Functor&& functor, Tuple&& t, index_sequence<Indexes...>) // // Example: // -// class Foo{void Bar(int);}; -// void user_function(int, string); -// void user_function(std::unique_ptr<Foo>); +// class Foo { +// public: +// void Bar(int); +// }; +// void user_function1(int, string); +// void user_function2(std::unique_ptr<Foo>); +// auto user_lambda = [](int, int) {}; // // int main() // { // std::tuple<int, string> tuple1(42, "bar"); -// // Invokes the user function overload on int, string. -// absl::apply(&user_function, tuple1); +// // Invokes the first user function on int, string. +// absl::apply(&user_function1, tuple1); // -// auto foo = absl::make_unique<Foo>(); -// std::tuple<Foo*, int> tuple2(foo.get(), 42); -// // Invokes the method Bar on foo with one argument 42. -// absl::apply(&Foo::Bar, foo.get(), 42); -// -// std::tuple<std::unique_ptr<Foo>> tuple3(absl::make_unique<Foo>()); +// std::tuple<std::unique_ptr<Foo>> tuple2(absl::make_unique<Foo>()); // // Invokes the user function that takes ownership of the unique // // pointer. -// absl::apply(&user_function, std::move(tuple)); +// absl::apply(&user_function2, std::move(tuple2)); +// +// auto foo = absl::make_unique<Foo>(); +// std::tuple<Foo*, int> tuple3(foo.get(), 42); +// // Invokes the method Bar on foo with one argument, 42. +// absl::apply(&Foo::Bar, tuple3); +// +// std::tuple<int, int> tuple4(8, 9); +// // Invokes a lambda. +// absl::apply(user_lambda, tuple4); // } template <typename Functor, typename Tuple> auto apply(Functor&& functor, Tuple&& t) |